From: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Create and use SoC WA infrastructure
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:13:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFl9OEjch58FvALc@msatwood-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175046031065.98943.9333446488996990324@1538d3639d33>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:58:30PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/xe: Create and use SoC WA infrastructure
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/150584/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17_BAT -> xe-pw-150584v1_BAT
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-150584v1_BAT absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-150584v1_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (9 -> 8)
> ------------------------------
>
> Missing (1): bat-adlp-vm
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-150584v1_BAT:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@xe_module_load@load:
> - bat-dg2-oem2: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-150584v1/bat-dg2-oem2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> - bat-atsm-2: [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17/bat-atsm-2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-150584v1/bat-atsm-2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> - bat-pvc-2: [PASS][5] -> [ABORT][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17/bat-pvc-2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-150584v1/bat-pvc-2/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][7] -> [ABORT][8]
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17/bat-adlp-7/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-150584v1/bat-adlp-7/igt@xe_module_load@load.html
These are caused by my assumption that tile0 would alwyas have a
media_gt, our call to XE_SOC() needs to have a check into xe_device
to ensure that there is a media gt.
>
>
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * Linux: xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17 -> xe-pw-150584v1
>
> IGT_8419: 8419
> xe-3284-3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17: 3dde2e2646b2619f765de9c226bfe0dda7bf1f17
> xe-pw-150584v1: 150584v1
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-150584v1/index.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 21:49 [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe: Create and use SoC WA infrastructure Matt Atwood
2025-06-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: add xe_soc_wa infrastructure Matt Atwood
2025-06-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for SoC OOB workarounds Matt Atwood
2025-06-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Move Wa_15015404425 to use the new EX_SOC_WA macro Matt Atwood
2025-06-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: extend Wa_15015404425 to apply to PTL Matt Atwood
2025-06-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe: disable wa_15015404425 for PTL B0 Matt Atwood
2025-06-23 21:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-06-23 23:31 ` Matt Roper
2025-06-24 19:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-06-24 19:39 ` Matt Atwood
2025-06-24 20:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-06-20 21:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Create and use SoC WA infrastructure Patchwork
2025-06-20 21:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-06-20 22:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-23 16:13 ` Matt Atwood [this message]
2025-06-21 6:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFl9OEjch58FvALc@msatwood-mobl \
--to=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox