Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	anshuman.gupta@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	lucas.demarchi@intel.com, aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
	umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com, frank.scarbrough@intel.com,
	sk.anirban@intel.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, airlied@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:34:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIDk5XBEolQVTVHU@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715104730.2109506-7-riana.tauro@intel.com>

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 04:17:26PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Add documentation for vendor specific device wedged recovery method
> and runtime survivability.

...

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index bd81ebd370cb..d28c92f8b80c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,28 @@ static void xe_device_wedged_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * DOC: Device Wedging

Xe Device Wedging?

> + * Xe driver uses device wedged uevent as documented in Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst.
> + *
> + * When device is in wedged state, every IOCTL will be blocked and GT cannot be
> + * used. Certain critical errors like gt reset failure, firmware failures can cause
> + * the device to be wedged. The default recovery mechanism for a wedged state

method

> + * is re-probe (unbind + bind)

Let's use uapi naming for consistency.

> + * Another recovery method is ``WEDGED=vendor-specific`. Below are the usecases

If we mean method, it's just ``vendor-specific`` with correct quoting.

> + * that trigger vendor-specific drm wedged uevent and actions to be performed
> + * to recover the device.
> + *
> + * Case 1: CSC firmware errors require a firmware flash to restore normal device
> + *         operation. Since firmware flash is a vendor-specific action
> + *         `WEDGED=vendor-specific`` recovery method along with
> + *         :ref:`runtime survivability mode <xe-survivability-mode>` is used to
> + *         notify userspace. User can then initiate a firmware flash using userspace tools
> + *         like fwupd to restore device to normal situation.
> + */
> +
> +/*
>   * xe_device_set_wedged_method - Set wedged recovery method
>   * @xe: xe device instance
>   * @method: recovery method to set
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> index 267d0e3fd85a..9f770db116f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> @@ -22,15 +22,18 @@
>  #define MAX_SCRATCH_MMIO 8
>  
>  /**
> - * DOC: Xe Boot Survivability
> + * DOC: Survivability Mode
>   *
> - * Boot Survivability is a software based workflow for recovering a system in a failed boot state
> + * Survivability Mode is a software based workflow for recovering a system in a failed boot state
>   * Here system recoverability is concerned with recovering the firmware responsible for boot.
>   *
> - * This is implemented by loading the driver with bare minimum (no drm card) to allow the firmware
> - * to be flashed through mei and collect telemetry. The driver's probe flow is modified
> - * such that it enters survivability mode when pcode initialization is incomplete and boot status
> - * denotes a failure.
> + * Boot Survivability
> + * ===================
> + *
> + * Boot Survivability is implemented by loading the driver with bare minimum (no drm card) to allow
> + * the firmware to be flashed through mei and collect telemetry. The driver's probe flow is

'mei driver' or it gives the impression of a tool. Also, what telemetry?

> + * modified such that it enters survivability mode when pcode initialization is incomplete and boot
> + * status denotes a failure.
>   *
>   * Survivability mode can also be entered manually using the survivability mode attribute available
>   * through configfs which is beneficial in several usecases. It can be used to address scenarios
> @@ -46,7 +49,7 @@
>   * Survivability mode is indicated by the below admin-only readable sysfs which provides additional

If it's sensitive, does it make sense to also log it?

>   * debug information::
>   *
> - *	/sys/bus/pci/devices/<device>/surivability_mode
> + *	/sys/bus/pci/devices/<device>/survivability_mode
>   *
>   * Capability Information:
>   *	Provides boot status
> @@ -56,6 +59,22 @@
>   *	Provides history of previous failures
>   * Auxiliary Information
>   *	Certain failures may have information in addition to postcode information
> + *
> + * Runtime Survivability
> + * =====================
> + *
> + * Certain runtime firmware errors can cause the device to enter a wedged state
> + * (:ref:`xe-device-wedging`) requiring a firmware flash to restore normal operation.
> + * Runtime Survivability Mode indicates that a firmware flash is necessary to recover the device and
> + * is indicated by the presence of survivability mode sysfs::
> + *
> + *	/sys/bus/pci/devices/<device>/survivability_mode
> + *
> + * Survivability mode sysfs provides information about the type of survivability mode.
> + *
> + * When such errors occur, userspace is notified with the drm device wedged uevent and runtime
> + * survivability mode. User can then initiate a firmware update using userspace tools like fwupd
> + * to restore device to normal operation.
>   */

Overall looks good and gets the point across, but I think consistent
termiologies would make it more easy to follow and understand.

method/mechanism/actions
wedged uevent/drm wedged uevent/drm device wedged uevent
firmware flash/firmware update
operation/situation

... and so on.

Raag

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-23 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-15 10:47 [PATCH v5 0/9] Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent Riana Tauro
2025-07-20 11:47   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] drm/xe: Set GT as wedged before sending " Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] drm/xe: Add a helper function to set recovery method Riana Tauro
2025-07-20 12:04   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Refactor survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-07-23 14:00   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-23 14:52     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Add support for Runtime " Riana Tauro
2025-07-23 14:08   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-23 14:41     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability Riana Tauro
2025-07-23 13:34   ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-07-24  5:25     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe: Add support to handle hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 14:08   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-15 16:48     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 16:53       ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Handle CSC Firmware reported Hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 14:10   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-15 16:39     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 16:58       ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-16  4:21         ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 12:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors (rev5) Patchwork
2025-07-15 12:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-15 12:45 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-15 13:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-07-15 17:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIDk5XBEolQVTVHU@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frank.scarbrough@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox