Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/irq: add ilk_display_irq_reset()
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:35:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMv8fwO34utdfIBP@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <903f35b109acea1f70b942a76392e58e88b0b720.1758198300.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 03:25:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Abstract ilk_display_irq_reset(), moving display related reset
> there. This results in a slightly different order for the reset,
> hopefully with no impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c    | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h    |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c                 | 11 +----------
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index 93c2e42f98c9..91ca62d9f067 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -1985,7 +1985,7 @@ void vlv_display_irq_postinstall(struct intel_display *display)
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&display->irq.lock);
>  }
>  
> -void ibx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
> +static void ibx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
>  {
>  	if (HAS_PCH_NOP(display))
>  		return;
> @@ -1996,6 +1996,21 @@ void ibx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
>  		intel_de_write(display, SERR_INT, 0xffffffff);
>  }
>  
> +void ilk_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> +	struct intel_uncore *uncore = to_intel_uncore(display->drm);
> +
> +	gen2_irq_reset(uncore, DE_IRQ_REGS);
> +	display->irq.ilk_de_imr_mask = ~0u;
> +
> +	if (display->platform.haswell) {
> +		intel_de_write(display, EDP_PSR_IMR, 0xffffffff);
> +		intel_de_write(display, EDP_PSR_IIR, 0xffffffff);
> +	}
> +
> +	ibx_display_irq_reset(display);
> +}
> +
>  void gen8_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
>  {
>  	enum pipe pipe;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> index c66db3851da4..cee120347064 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ u32 gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(struct intel_display *display, const u32 master_ctl);
>  void gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display, const u32 iir);
>  
>  void i9xx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
> -void ibx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
> +void ilk_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
>  void vlv_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
>  void gen8_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
>  void gen11_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index ab65402bc6bf..1571f9de3c71 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -658,20 +658,11 @@ static void ilk_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &dev_priv->uncore;
>  
> -	gen2_irq_reset(uncore, DE_IRQ_REGS);
> -	display->irq.ilk_de_imr_mask = ~0u;
> -
>  	if (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == 7)
>  		intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN7_ERR_INT, 0xffffffff);

GEN7_ERR_INT is display stuff as well.

>  
> -	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
> -		intel_uncore_write(uncore, EDP_PSR_IMR, 0xffffffff);
> -		intel_uncore_write(uncore, EDP_PSR_IIR, 0xffffffff);
> -	}
> -
>  	gen5_gt_irq_reset(to_gt(dev_priv));
> -
> -	ibx_display_irq_reset(display);
> +	ilk_display_irq_reset(display);
>  }
>  
>  static void valleyview_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -- 
> 2.47.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18 12:25 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 12:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/irq: use a dedicated IMR cache for VLV/CHV Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 17:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-18 12:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/irq: use a dedicated IMR cache for gen 5-7 Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 17:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-18 12:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/irq: rename irq_mask to gen2_imr_mask Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 17:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-18 12:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/irq: rename de_irq_mask[] to de_pipe_imr_mask[] Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 17:33   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-18 12:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/irq: add ilk_display_irq_reset() Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 12:35   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-09-18 12:42     ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 12:41   ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 12:54     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-18 13:46       ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 13:38   ` [PATCH v3] " Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 17:25     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-19  7:17       ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-18 12:46 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask Patchwork
2025-09-18 12:47 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-18 13:02 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-18 13:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-18 13:36 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-18 13:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-18 13:52 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-18 14:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-18 14:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask (rev3) Patchwork
2025-09-18 14:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-18 14:47 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-18 15:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-18 21:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask Patchwork
2025-09-18 22:30 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-18 23:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/irq: clarify and refactor ->irq_mask (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMv8fwO34utdfIBP@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox