Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/i915: move i915 specific display adaptation files to display-adapt
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:30:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSXnyB8JjEY7qelM@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <929e694adba1e3942c685826906bd8123a1696d3@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:01:11PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> > The display/ subdirectory currently contains files that are about i915
> > core driver adaptation to display rather than generic display
> > implementation. Move them to a new i915 subdirectory display-adapt/.
> >
> > In the xe driver, all of its display/ is basically xe core adaptation to
> > display. It's just that i915 display/ contains the actual display
> > implementation for both. Ideally, we'd have the shared display code
> > somewhere else, and the adaptation in i915 would be under display/, but
> > we're not quite ready for that kind of churn yet. So let's just call it
> > display-adapt for now.
> >
> > xe basically has equivalent files to the ones that are being moved,
> > apart from intel_dpt.c, for which the implementation is quite different.
> >
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 | 23 +++++++++++--------
> >  .../{display => display-adapt}/intel_bo.c     |  3 ++-
> >  .../intel_display_rpm.c                       |  5 ++--
> >  .../{display => display-adapt}/intel_dpt.c    | 11 +++++----
> >  .../intel_dsb_buffer.c                        |  5 ++--
> >  .../{display => display-adapt}/intel_fb_bo.c  |  9 ++++----
> >  .../{display => display-adapt}/intel_fb_pin.c | 14 +++++------
> >  .../intel_fbdev_fb.c                          |  5 +++-
> >  .../intel_hdcp_gsc.c                          |  2 +-
> >  .../{display => display-adapt}/intel_panic.c  |  6 ++---
> >  .../intel_plane_initial.c                     | 17 +++++++-------
> >  11 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_bo.c (98%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_display_rpm.c (95%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_dpt.c (97%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_dsb_buffer.c (96%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_fb_bo.c (94%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_fb_pin.c (97%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_fbdev_fb.c (94%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_hdcp_gsc.c (99%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_panic.c (84%)
> >  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{display => display-adapt}/intel_plane_initial.c (97%)
> 
> I've been postponing the series pending other refactoring.
> 
> Anyway, Ville, are you okay with moving intel_dpt.c to i915? Doesn't
> that reflect the reality with i915 and xe implementations?

Yeah. Seems fine.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15 16:01 [RFC] drm/i915: move i915 specific display adaptation files to display-adapt Jani Nikula
2025-10-16  1:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-10-16  1:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-16  1:45 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-16 19:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-10-16 19:42 ` [RFC] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-21  9:00   ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-21 15:03     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-11-25 14:01 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-25 17:30   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aSXnyB8JjEY7qelM@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox