From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: select CONFIGFS_FS dependency
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:10:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUlfUKVo5Kfv8sZy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18e569c3-188f-43eb-931d-3aa7f449aac6@intel.com>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 04:18:56PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>
>
> On 12/19/2025 10:12 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/19/2025 5:32 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:04:06AM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 01:35:14PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> > > > > Xe driver uses configfs functions to expose configuration to userspace.
> > > > > If CONFIGFS_FS is built as module (=m) when Xe is built-in (=y),
> > > > > undefined reference errors occur.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps we don't need this middle phrase. Only the first and the last.
> > > > But anyway, we need the patch in. I just pushed it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Rodrigo.
> > > >
> > > > > Add select CONFIGFS_FS to ensure configfs is built at minimum required
> > > > > level.
> > >
> > > If we make this change, shouldn't we also remove all of the #ifdef logic
> > > we have to support running without configfs?
> >
> > but is it a good idea to always back select CONFIGFS ?
> > maybe the actual fix should be like this:
> >
> > -xe-$(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS) += xe_configfs.o
> > +
> > +ifdef CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS
> > + xe-y += xe_configfs.o
> > +endif
> >
>
> Hi Matt/Michal
>
> This was the first approach i tried. But if CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS is set to m
> we get undefined references for the configfs functions
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.o: in function
> `xe_configfs_get_psmi_enabled':
> xe_configfs.c:(.text+0x182c): undefined reference to `config_item_put'
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.o: in function `xe_configfs_init':
> xe_configfs.c:(.init.text+0x24): undefined reference to `config_group_init'
>
> We should either change the header checks to have IS_BUILTIN
>
> or select.
>
> Since there are many other drivers selecting CONFIGFS and this is seen in
> powerpc builds. Sent this as the first patch
>
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig:1979: select CONFIGFS_FS
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig:518: select CONFIGFS_FS
Riana, could you please give a try on Jani's suggestion?
depends on CONFIGFS_FS || CONFIGFS_FS=n
>
> Thanks
> Riana
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512190827.IeXYj4qg-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512181854.hPyTAXc5-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512190407.CcUFXX2F-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > Fixes: 16280ded45fb ("drm/xe: Add configfs to enable survivability mode")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> > > > > index 4b288eb3f5b0..1094c5fc5bdf 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ config DRM_XE
> > > > > select WANT_DEV_COREDUMP
> > > > > select AUXILIARY_BUS
> > > > > select REGMAP if I2C
> > > > > + select CONFIGFS_FS
> > > > > help
> > > > > Driver for Intel Xe2 series GPUs and later. Experimental support
> > > > > for Xe series is also available.
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.47.1
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-22 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 8:05 [PATCH] drm/xe: select CONFIGFS_FS dependency Riana Tauro
2025-12-19 8:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-12-19 9:00 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-19 16:04 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-19 16:32 ` Matt Roper
2025-12-19 16:42 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-19 16:53 ` Matt Roper
2025-12-19 17:00 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-12-21 10:48 ` Riana Tauro
2025-12-22 15:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-12-22 12:42 ` Jani Nikula
2026-01-02 14:57 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-02 15:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-12-20 10:07 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUlfUKVo5Kfv8sZy@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox