* [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
@ 2026-01-19 14:31 Karthik Poosa
2026-01-20 13:38 ` Raag Jadav
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Karthik Poosa @ 2026-01-19 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe
Cc: anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar, rodrigo.vivi, raag.jadav,
Karthik Poosa
Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in
xe_hwmon_channel. Without this, adding any new hwmon channel
causes an extra VRAM channel to appear. This remained unnoticed
earlier because VRAM was the final xe hwmon channel.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
index baf277955b33..f614f1308dec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
CHANNEL_MCTRL,
CHANNEL_PCIE,
CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
- CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
+ CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
CHANNEL_MAX,
};
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
2026-01-19 14:31 [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation Karthik Poosa
@ 2026-01-20 13:38 ` Raag Jadav
2026-02-06 7:29 ` Poosa, Karthik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raag Jadav @ 2026-01-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karthik Poosa; +Cc: intel-xe, anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar, rodrigo.vivi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 08:01:38PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in
> xe_hwmon_channel. Without this, adding any new hwmon channel
> causes an extra VRAM channel to appear. This remained unnoticed
> earlier because VRAM was the final xe hwmon channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> index baf277955b33..f614f1308dec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
> CHANNEL_MCTRL,
> CHANNEL_PCIE,
> CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
> - CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
> + CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
Can you also check in_range() logic and investigate how channel id greater
than CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX (for example 23) is delt with?
Raag
> CHANNEL_MAX,
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
2026-01-20 13:38 ` Raag Jadav
@ 2026-02-06 7:29 ` Poosa, Karthik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Poosa, Karthik @ 2026-02-06 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Raag Jadav; +Cc: intel-xe, anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar, rodrigo.vivi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1783 bytes --]
2
On 20-01-2026 19:08, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 08:01:38PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
>> Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in
>> xe_hwmon_channel. Without this, adding any new hwmon channel
>> causes an extra VRAM channel to appear. This remained unnoticed
>> earlier because VRAM was the final xe hwmon channel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa<karthik.poosa@intel.com>
>> Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> index baf277955b33..f614f1308dec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
>> CHANNEL_MCTRL,
>> CHANNEL_PCIE,
>> CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
>> - CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
>> + CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
> Can you also check in_range() logic and investigate how channel id greater
> than CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX (for example 23) is delt with?
>
> Raag
Hi Raag,
We are not seeing new channels with in_range() + CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX as
1. hwmon_info[] has defined only CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX channels,
2. CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX is the max channel supported in xe_hwmon.c
Checked in_range implementation also, you are right, using
|MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS| with |in_range|() is correct, |as it |requires a
start value and length.
Using |CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX| instead would pass offset which also includes
extra offsets from CHANNEL_CARD to CHANNEL_PCIe.
I will use MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS with in_range in the next revision.
>
>> CHANNEL_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4331 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
@ 2026-02-06 8:16 Karthik Poosa
2026-02-11 11:17 ` Raag Jadav
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Karthik Poosa @ 2026-02-06 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe
Cc: anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar, rodrigo.vivi, raag.jadav,
Karthik Poosa
Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in xe_hwmon_channel.
Without this, adding any new hwmon channel causes extra VRAM channel
to appear. This remained unnoticed earlier because VRAM was the
final xe hwmon channel.
v2: Use MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS with in_range() instead of
CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX. (Raag)
Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
index baf277955b33..0fd4d4f1014a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
CHANNEL_MCTRL,
CHANNEL_PCIE,
CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
- CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
+ CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
CHANNEL_MAX,
};
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static struct xe_reg xe_hwmon_get_reg(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, enum xe_hwmon_reg
return BMG_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE;
else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE;
- else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
+ else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE_N(channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N);
} else if (xe->info.platform == XE_DG2) {
if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static int xe_hwmon_read_label(struct device *dev,
*str = "mctrl";
else if (channel == CHANNEL_PCIE)
*str = "pcie";
- else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
+ else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
*str = hwmon->temp.vram_label[channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N];
return 0;
case hwmon_power:
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
2026-02-06 8:16 Karthik Poosa
@ 2026-02-11 11:17 ` Raag Jadav
2026-02-18 0:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raag Jadav @ 2026-02-11 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karthik Poosa; +Cc: intel-xe, anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar, rodrigo.vivi
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 01:46:55PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in xe_hwmon_channel.
> Without this, adding any new hwmon channel causes extra VRAM channel
> to appear. This remained unnoticed earlier because VRAM was the
> final xe hwmon channel.
>
> v2: Use MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS with in_range() instead of
> CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX. (Raag)
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
Fixes tag usually goes first, but perhaps it can be re-ordered while
applying. In any case,
Reviewed-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> index baf277955b33..0fd4d4f1014a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
> CHANNEL_MCTRL,
> CHANNEL_PCIE,
> CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
> - CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
> + CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
> CHANNEL_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static struct xe_reg xe_hwmon_get_reg(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, enum xe_hwmon_reg
> return BMG_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE;
> else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
> return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE;
> - else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
> + else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
> return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE_N(channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N);
> } else if (xe->info.platform == XE_DG2) {
> if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
> @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static int xe_hwmon_read_label(struct device *dev,
> *str = "mctrl";
> else if (channel == CHANNEL_PCIE)
> *str = "pcie";
> - else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
> + else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
> *str = hwmon->temp.vram_label[channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N];
> return 0;
> case hwmon_power:
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation
2026-02-11 11:17 ` Raag Jadav
@ 2026-02-18 0:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2026-02-18 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Raag Jadav; +Cc: Karthik Poosa, intel-xe, anshuman.gupta, badal.nilawar
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:17:04PM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 01:46:55PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> > Remove the unnecessary VRAM channel entry introduced in xe_hwmon_channel.
> > Without this, adding any new hwmon channel causes extra VRAM channel
> > to appear. This remained unnoticed earlier because VRAM was the
> > final xe hwmon channel.
> >
> > v2: Use MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS with in_range() instead of
> > CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX. (Raag)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> > Fixes: 49a498338417 ("drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual VRAM channel temperature")
>
> Fixes tag usually goes first, but perhaps it can be re-ordered while
> applying. In any case,
done and pushed, thank you both
>
> Reviewed-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > index baf277955b33..0fd4d4f1014a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
> > CHANNEL_MCTRL,
> > CHANNEL_PCIE,
> > CHANNEL_VRAM_N,
> > - CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS,
> > + CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX = CHANNEL_VRAM_N + MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS - 1,
> > CHANNEL_MAX,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static struct xe_reg xe_hwmon_get_reg(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, enum xe_hwmon_reg
> > return BMG_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE;
> > else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
> > return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE;
> > - else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
> > + else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
> > return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE_N(channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N);
> > } else if (xe->info.platform == XE_DG2) {
> > if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
> > @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static int xe_hwmon_read_label(struct device *dev,
> > *str = "mctrl";
> > else if (channel == CHANNEL_PCIE)
> > *str = "pcie";
> > - else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX))
> > + else if (in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
> > *str = hwmon->temp.vram_label[channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N];
> > return 0;
> > case hwmon_power:
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-18 0:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-19 14:31 [PATCH] drm/xe/hwmon: Prevent unintended VRAM channel creation Karthik Poosa
2026-01-20 13:38 ` Raag Jadav
2026-02-06 7:29 ` Poosa, Karthik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-06 8:16 Karthik Poosa
2026-02-11 11:17 ` Raag Jadav
2026-02-18 0:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox