* [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode
@ 2026-01-20 11:20 Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satyanarayana K V P @ 2026-01-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe; +Cc: Satyanarayana K V P
When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
users to run workloads.
In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
interfaces for the PF remain available at:
sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>
Satyanarayana K V P (1):
drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode
2026-01-20 11:20 [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode Satyanarayana K V P
@ 2026-01-20 11:20 ` Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 20:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satyanarayana K V P @ 2026-01-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe
Cc: Satyanarayana K V P, Michal Wajdeczko, Rodrigo Vivi,
Piotr Piórkowski
When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
users to run workloads.
In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
interfaces for the PF remain available at:
sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>
Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
index 0907868b32d6..134d2e661c7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
@@ -458,6 +458,20 @@ static ssize_t disable_late_binding_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
return size;
}
+static void update_minor_dev(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_minor **minor,
+ __maybe_unused struct dentry **root)
+{
+ struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
+
+ if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
+ return;
+
+ (*minor)->dev = drm;
+ (*minor)->kdev = drm->dev;
+ (*minor)->debugfs_root = drm->debugfs_root;
+ *root = (*minor)->debugfs_root;
+}
+
static const struct file_operations disable_late_binding_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.read = disable_late_binding_show,
@@ -475,6 +489,8 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
u8 tile_id;
u8 id;
+ update_minor_dev(xe, &minor, &root);
+
drm_debugfs_create_files(debugfs_list,
ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_list),
root, minor);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 00afc84a8683..fdd8668bd565 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -993,9 +993,11 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
if (err)
return err;
- err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe)) {
+ err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
xe_display_register(xe);
@@ -1046,7 +1048,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
xe_nvm_fini(xe);
- drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
+ if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
+ drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
xe_bo_pci_dev_remove_all(xe);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
index 6604b89330d5..bb1e7bc8bf4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include "xe_device_types.h"
#include "xe_gt_types.h"
#include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
static inline struct xe_device *to_xe_device(const struct drm_device *dev)
{
@@ -177,6 +178,11 @@ static inline bool xe_device_has_mert(struct xe_device *xe)
return xe->info.has_mert;
}
+static inline struct device *xe_to_drm_kdev(struct xe_device *xe)
+{
+ return xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe) ? xe->drm.dev : xe->drm.primary->kdev;
+}
+
u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
index abf87fe0b345..90fa30de85ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ int xe_oa_register(struct xe_device *xe)
return 0;
oa->metrics_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("metrics",
- &xe->drm.primary->kdev->kobj);
+ &(xe_to_drm_kdev(xe)->kobj));
if (!oa->metrics_kobj)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
index 9054fdc34597..9a99fafbe77d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(const struct xe_device *xe)
*/
static inline bool xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(const struct xe_device *xe)
{
- return !xe->info.probe_display;
+ return !xe->info.probe_display && xe->sriov.pf.driver_max_vfs > 0;
}
static inline struct mutex *xe_sriov_pf_master_mutex(struct xe_device *xe)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode
2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
@ 2026-01-20 20:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2026-01-20 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Satyanarayana K V P; +Cc: intel-xe, Michal Wajdeczko, Piotr Piórkowski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:20:10AM +0000, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
> management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
> users to run workloads.
>
> In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
> interfaces for the PF remain available at:
>
> sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
> debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>
+dri-devel since this can be useful to other drivers as well.
btw, on the subject it should be drm/xe/pf instead of vf right?!
>
> Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 11 +++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> index 0907868b32d6..134d2e661c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> @@ -458,6 +458,20 @@ static ssize_t disable_late_binding_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
> return size;
> }
>
> +static void update_minor_dev(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_minor **minor,
> + __maybe_unused struct dentry **root)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
> +
> + if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
> + return;
> +
> + (*minor)->dev = drm;
> + (*minor)->kdev = drm->dev;
> + (*minor)->debugfs_root = drm->debugfs_root;
> + *root = (*minor)->debugfs_root;
I know that I had a few of them in my experiments, but I was wondering
if we could minimize this to just
minor->debugfs_root = dev->debugfs_root;
before the create files, instead this big hammer here....
and perhaps even minimize the use of the drm_debugfs in the cases
where we need in this admin only mode?
in other words, do we have another way to avoid a big hammer like
this?
> +}
> +
> static const struct file_operations disable_late_binding_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .read = disable_late_binding_show,
> @@ -475,6 +489,8 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> u8 tile_id;
> u8 id;
>
> + update_minor_dev(xe, &minor, &root);
also, can/should we make this conditional on the admin mode only
instead of always?!
> +
> drm_debugfs_create_files(debugfs_list,
> ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_list),
> root, minor);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 00afc84a8683..fdd8668bd565 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -993,9 +993,11 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe)) {
> + err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
ack on this...
>
> xe_display_register(xe);
>
> @@ -1046,7 +1048,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> xe_nvm_fini(xe);
>
> - drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
> + if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
> + drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
ack on this too...
>
> xe_bo_pci_dev_remove_all(xe);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 6604b89330d5..bb1e7bc8bf4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include "xe_device_types.h"
> #include "xe_gt_types.h"
> #include "xe_sriov.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
>
> static inline struct xe_device *to_xe_device(const struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> @@ -177,6 +178,11 @@ static inline bool xe_device_has_mert(struct xe_device *xe)
> return xe->info.has_mert;
> }
>
> +static inline struct device *xe_to_drm_kdev(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + return xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe) ? xe->drm.dev : xe->drm.primary->kdev;
> +}
> +
> u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
>
> void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> index abf87fe0b345..90fa30de85ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ int xe_oa_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> return 0;
>
> oa->metrics_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("metrics",
> - &xe->drm.primary->kdev->kobj);
> + &(xe_to_drm_kdev(xe)->kobj));
hmmm... what about skipping oa entirely if in admin mode?!
OA metrics is usage and should be working inside the VM, not in the admin mode.
> if (!oa->metrics_kobj)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> index 9054fdc34597..9a99fafbe77d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(const struct xe_device *xe)
> */
> static inline bool xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(const struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - return !xe->info.probe_display;
> + return !xe->info.probe_display && xe->sriov.pf.driver_max_vfs > 0;
I'm confused on why the probe_display is in the equation...
> }
>
> static inline struct mutex *xe_sriov_pf_master_mutex(struct xe_device *xe)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Thank you so much for taking care of this.
We definitely need it.
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-20 20:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-20 11:20 [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 20:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox