public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode
@ 2026-01-20 11:20 Satyanarayana K V P
  2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satyanarayana K V P @ 2026-01-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-xe; +Cc: Satyanarayana K V P

When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
users to run workloads.

In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
interfaces for the PF remain available at:

sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>


Satyanarayana K V P (1):
  drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode

 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c          | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c           | 11 +++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h           |  6 ++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c               |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode
  2026-01-20 11:20 [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode Satyanarayana K V P
@ 2026-01-20 11:20 ` Satyanarayana K V P
  2026-01-20 20:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satyanarayana K V P @ 2026-01-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-xe
  Cc: Satyanarayana K V P, Michal Wajdeczko, Rodrigo Vivi,
	Piotr Piórkowski

When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
users to run workloads.

In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
interfaces for the PF remain available at:

sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>

Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c          | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c           | 11 +++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h           |  6 ++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c               |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
index 0907868b32d6..134d2e661c7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
@@ -458,6 +458,20 @@ static ssize_t disable_late_binding_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
 	return size;
 }
 
+static void update_minor_dev(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_minor **minor,
+			     __maybe_unused struct dentry **root)
+{
+	struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
+
+	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
+		return;
+
+	(*minor)->dev = drm;
+	(*minor)->kdev = drm->dev;
+	(*minor)->debugfs_root = drm->debugfs_root;
+	*root = (*minor)->debugfs_root;
+}
+
 static const struct file_operations disable_late_binding_fops = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	.read = disable_late_binding_show,
@@ -475,6 +489,8 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
 	u8 tile_id;
 	u8 id;
 
+	update_minor_dev(xe, &minor, &root);
+
 	drm_debugfs_create_files(debugfs_list,
 				 ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_list),
 				 root, minor);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 00afc84a8683..fdd8668bd565 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -993,9 +993,11 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe)) {
+		err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 
 	xe_display_register(xe);
 
@@ -1046,7 +1048,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
 
 	xe_nvm_fini(xe);
 
-	drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
+	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
+		drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
 
 	xe_bo_pci_dev_remove_all(xe);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
index 6604b89330d5..bb1e7bc8bf4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include "xe_device_types.h"
 #include "xe_gt_types.h"
 #include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
 
 static inline struct xe_device *to_xe_device(const struct drm_device *dev)
 {
@@ -177,6 +178,11 @@ static inline bool xe_device_has_mert(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return xe->info.has_mert;
 }
 
+static inline struct device *xe_to_drm_kdev(struct xe_device *xe)
+{
+	return xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe) ? xe->drm.dev : xe->drm.primary->kdev;
+}
+
 u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
 
 void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
index abf87fe0b345..90fa30de85ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ int xe_oa_register(struct xe_device *xe)
 		return 0;
 
 	oa->metrics_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("metrics",
-						  &xe->drm.primary->kdev->kobj);
+						  &(xe_to_drm_kdev(xe)->kobj));
 	if (!oa->metrics_kobj)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
index 9054fdc34597..9a99fafbe77d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(const struct xe_device *xe)
  */
 static inline bool xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(const struct xe_device *xe)
 {
-	return !xe->info.probe_display;
+	return !xe->info.probe_display && xe->sriov.pf.driver_max_vfs > 0;
 }
 
 static inline struct mutex *xe_sriov_pf_master_mutex(struct xe_device *xe)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode
  2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
@ 2026-01-20 20:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2026-01-20 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Satyanarayana K V P; +Cc: intel-xe, Michal Wajdeczko, Piotr Piórkowski

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:20:10AM +0000, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
> management functions and should not expose a device node that would allow
> users to run workloads.
> 
> In this mode, no DRM device entry is created; however, sysfs and debugfs
> interfaces for the PF remain available at:
> 
> sysfs: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/<B:D:F>
> debugfs: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/<B:D:F>

+dri-devel since this can be useful to other drivers as well.

btw, on the subject it should be drm/xe/pf instead of vf right?!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c          | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c           | 11 +++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h           |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c               |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> index 0907868b32d6..134d2e661c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> @@ -458,6 +458,20 @@ static ssize_t disable_late_binding_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
>  	return size;
>  }
>  
> +static void update_minor_dev(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_minor **minor,
> +			     __maybe_unused struct dentry **root)
> +{
> +	struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
> +
> +	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
> +		return;
> +
> +	(*minor)->dev = drm;
> +	(*minor)->kdev = drm->dev;
> +	(*minor)->debugfs_root = drm->debugfs_root;
> +	*root = (*minor)->debugfs_root;

I know that I had a few of them in my experiments, but I was wondering
if we could minimize this to just

minor->debugfs_root = dev->debugfs_root;

before the create files, instead this big hammer here....

and perhaps even minimize the use of the drm_debugfs in the cases
where we need in this admin only mode?

in other words, do we have another way to avoid a big hammer like
this?

> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations disable_late_binding_fops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.read = disable_late_binding_show,
> @@ -475,6 +489,8 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	u8 tile_id;
>  	u8 id;
>  
> +	update_minor_dev(xe, &minor, &root);

also, can/should we make this conditional on the admin mode only
instead of always?!

> +
>  	drm_debugfs_create_files(debugfs_list,
>  				 ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_list),
>  				 root, minor);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 00afc84a8683..fdd8668bd565 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -993,9 +993,11 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe)) {
> +		err = drm_dev_register(&xe->drm, 0);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}

ack on this...

>  
>  	xe_display_register(xe);
>  
> @@ -1046,7 +1048,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	xe_nvm_fini(xe);
>  
> -	drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);
> +	if (!xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe))
> +		drm_dev_unplug(&xe->drm);

ack on this too...

>  
>  	xe_bo_pci_dev_remove_all(xe);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 6604b89330d5..bb1e7bc8bf4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include "xe_device_types.h"
>  #include "xe_gt_types.h"
>  #include "xe_sriov.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
>  
>  static inline struct xe_device *to_xe_device(const struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -177,6 +178,11 @@ static inline bool xe_device_has_mert(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return xe->info.has_mert;
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct device *xe_to_drm_kdev(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	return xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(xe) ? xe->drm.dev : xe->drm.primary->kdev;
> +}
> +
>  u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
>  
>  void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> index abf87fe0b345..90fa30de85ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ int xe_oa_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	oa->metrics_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("metrics",
> -						  &xe->drm.primary->kdev->kobj);
> +						  &(xe_to_drm_kdev(xe)->kobj));

hmmm... what about skipping oa entirely if in admin mode?!
OA metrics is usage and should be working inside the VM, not in the admin mode.

>  	if (!oa->metrics_kobj)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> index 9054fdc34597..9a99fafbe77d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(const struct xe_device *xe)
>   */
>  static inline bool xe_sriov_pf_admin_only(const struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
> -	return !xe->info.probe_display;
> +	return !xe->info.probe_display && xe->sriov.pf.driver_max_vfs > 0;

I'm confused on why the probe_display is in the equation...

>  }
>  
>  static inline struct mutex *xe_sriov_pf_master_mutex(struct xe_device *xe)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Thank you so much for taking care of this.
We definitely need it.

Thanks,
Rodrigo.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-20 20:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-20 11:20 [RFC 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 11:20 ` [RFC 1/1] drm/xe/vf: Skip creating DRM device entries in PF admin‑only mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-01-20 20:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox