Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/configfs: Fix 'parameter name omitted' errors
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:52:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYJSCAepz3ORravX@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203193745.576-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 08:37:45PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On some configs and old compilers we can get following build errors:
> 
>   ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h: In function 'xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb':
>   ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h:40:76: error: parameter name omitted
>    static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
>                                                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h: In function 'xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb':
>   ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h:42:77: error: parameter name omitted
>    static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
>                                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> when trying to define our configfs stub functions. Fix that.

only when trying to define the sutbs?
anyway,

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> 
> Fixes: 7a4756b2fd04 ("drm/xe/lrc: Allow to add user commands mid context switch")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> v1: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/696102/?series=159395&rev=1
> v2: align everything with the .c signatures (Rodrigo)
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> index 487531269511..07d62bf0c152 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> @@ -23,9 +23,11 @@ bool xe_configfs_primary_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  bool xe_configfs_media_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  bool xe_configfs_get_psmi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> -u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
> +u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +				       enum xe_engine_class class,
>  				       const u32 **cs);
> -u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
> +u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +					enum xe_engine_class class,
>  					const u32 **cs);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>  unsigned int xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> @@ -40,9 +42,11 @@ static inline bool xe_configfs_primary_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return
>  static inline bool xe_configfs_media_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return true; }
>  static inline u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return U64_MAX; }
>  static inline bool xe_configfs_get_psmi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
> -static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
> +static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +						     enum xe_engine_class class,
>  						     const u32 **cs) { return 0; }
> -static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
> +static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +						      enum xe_engine_class class,
>  						      const u32 **cs) { return 0; }
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>  static inline unsigned int xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03 19:37 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/configfs: Fix 'parameter name omitted' errors Michal Wajdeczko
2026-02-03 19:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-02-03 19:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-03 19:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-02-03 20:38   ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-02-03 20:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2026-02-03 21:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Lin, Shuicheng
2026-02-04 10:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
2026-02-04 21:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/configfs: Fix 'parameter name omitted' errors (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-04 21:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-04 22:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-05 11:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYJSCAepz3ORravX@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox