From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Restore the missing check for intel_dp_has_joiner
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 14:53:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYSSsZXAl1AkTglZ@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db09f0bf-c782-4d9f-9e9f-0dacbbc77cfb@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 06:07:44PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 2/5/2026 3:11 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 02:06:23PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> > > Commit ad121a62d566 ("drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid")
> > > replaced intel_dp_num_joined_pipes() with an explicit joiner candidate
> > > iteration. The previous code implicitly checked for DP joiner capability
> > > via intel_dp_has_joiner(), but this check was lost during the refactor.
> > >
> > > Restore the missing intel_dp_has_joiner() check in intel_dp_can_join() so
> > > that DP specific joiner conditions are taken into account.
> > >
> > > This change also requires propagating struct intel_dp * from the callers
> > > down to the new check.
> > >
> > > Fixes: ad121a62d566 ("drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid")
> > > Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 7 ++++---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 4 ++--
> > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index 4f5b89f80e55..3021c64d0f85 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -1397,9 +1397,14 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
> > > }
> > > static
> > > -bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
> > > +bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > int num_joined_pipes)
> > > {
> > > + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > > +
> > > + if (num_joined_pipes > 1 && !intel_dp_has_joiner(intel_dp))
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > switch (num_joined_pipes) {
> > > case 1:
> > > return true;
> > > @@ -1496,7 +1501,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> > > * over candidate pipe counts and evaluate each combination.
> > > */
> > > status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> > > - for_each_joiner_candidate(connector, mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > + for_each_joiner_candidate(intel_dp, connector, mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > int dsc_slice_count = 0;
> > > status = intel_pfit_mode_valid(display, mode, output_format, num_joined_pipes);
> > > @@ -2895,7 +2900,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > !intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, crtc_state))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > - for_each_joiner_candidate(connector, adjusted_mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > + for_each_joiner_candidate(intel_dp, connector, adjusted_mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > /*
> > > * NOTE:
> > > * The crtc_state->joiner_pipes should have been set at the end
> > > @@ -7213,13 +7218,14 @@ int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > return sdp_guardband;
> > > }
> > > -bool intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(struct intel_connector *connector,
> > > +bool intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > + struct intel_connector *connector,
> > > int hdisplay,
> > > int num_joined_pipes)
> > intel_dp can be always deducted from the connector, via
> > intel_attached_dp(), so no need to pass intel_dp separately.
>
> Since this function is called from the iterator macro for DP MST also, I was
> wondering if for MST case we need to get it via encoder/dig_port.
No, intel_attached_dp() works for MST connectors as well.
> Regards,
>
> Ankit
>
>
> >
> > > {
> > > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector);
> > > - if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
> > > + if (!intel_dp_can_join(intel_dp, num_joined_pipes))
> > > return false;
> > > if (hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > > index cbd7fcd3789f..37302ebe1cf9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > > @@ -227,12 +227,13 @@ bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
> > > int htotal,
> > > int dsc_slice_count,
> > > int num_joined_pipes);
> > > -bool intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(struct intel_connector *connector,
> > > +bool intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > + struct intel_connector *connector,
> > > int hdisplay,
> > > int num_joined_pipes);
> > > -#define for_each_joiner_candidate(__connector, __mode, __num_joined_pipes) \
> > > +#define for_each_joiner_candidate(__intel_dp, __connector, __mode, __num_joined_pipes) \
> > > for ((__num_joined_pipes) = 1; (__num_joined_pipes) <= (I915_MAX_PIPES); (__num_joined_pipes)++) \
> > > - for_each_if(intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(__connector, (__mode)->hdisplay, __num_joined_pipes))
> > > + for_each_if(intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(__intel_dp, __connector, (__mode)->hdisplay, __num_joined_pipes))
> > > #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > index 29713075e413..b2d3f35edd78 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > pipe_config->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
> > > pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
> > > - for_each_joiner_candidate(connector, adjusted_mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > + for_each_joiner_candidate(intel_dp, connector, adjusted_mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > if (num_joined_pipes > 1)
> > > pipe_config->joiner_pipes = GENMASK(crtc->pipe + num_joined_pipes - 1,
> > > crtc->pipe);
> > > @@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> > > }
> > > *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> > > - for_each_joiner_candidate(connector, mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > + for_each_joiner_candidate(intel_dp, connector, mode, num_joined_pipes) {
> > > int dsc_slice_count = 0;
> > > if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) &&
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 8:36 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05 8:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Make intel_dp_can_join() static Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05 9:44 ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05 8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Restore the missing check for intel_dp_has_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05 9:41 ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05 12:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-05 12:53 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-02-05 14:20 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-06 4:47 ` Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-06 10:33 ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05 9:37 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix Patchwork
2026-02-05 9:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-05 10:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-06 5:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-06 5:25 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-02-06 5:48 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix Patchwork
2026-02-06 5:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-07 8:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYSSsZXAl1AkTglZ@ideak-desk.lan \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox