Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	<aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
	<frank.scarbrough@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:37:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa9b7c63-34cb-425b-9bf4-d45ee2920bb6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHFM1MSvgrn4U1iF@unerlige-desk.amr.corp.intel.com>



On 7/11/2025 11:11 PM, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:50:21PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>> Add a debugfs fault handler to trigger csc error handler that
>> wedges the device and sends drm uevent
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c  |  2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/ 
>> xe_debugfs.c
>> index d83cd6ed3fa8..134610437aea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #endif
>>
>> DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(gt_reset_failure);
>> +DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(inject_csc_hw_error);
>>
>> static struct xe_device *node_to_xe(struct drm_info_node *node)
>> {
>> @@ -273,4 +274,5 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>>     xe_pxp_debugfs_register(xe->pxp);
>>
>>     fault_create_debugfs_attr("fail_gt_reset", root, &gt_reset_failure);
>> +    fault_create_debugfs_attr("inject_csc_hw_error", root, 
>> &inject_csc_hw_error);
> 
> Maybe create this attribute only for BMG since it will bail out anyways 
> with an error when the worker runs? OR are you expecting to see that log 
> message which says "runtime survivability not supported".
> 
> The absence of this attribute in debugfs can also be sufficient to 
> indicate that it's not supported.

yeah makes sense. Will add this only for bmg

Thanks
Riana
> 
> Thanks,
> Umesh
> 
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/ 
>> xe_hw_error.c
>> index 7cc9b8a7fa1a..2d56a93b3a71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>>  * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>>  */
>>
>> +#include <linux/fault-inject.h>
>> +
>> #include "regs/xe_gsc_regs.h"
>> #include "regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h"
>> #include "regs/xe_irq_regs.h"
>> @@ -13,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
>>
>> #define  HEC_UNCORR_FW_ERR_BITS 4
>> +extern struct fault_attr inject_csc_hw_error;
>>
>> /* Error categories reported by hardware */
>> enum hardware_error {
>> @@ -43,6 +46,11 @@ static const char *hw_error_to_str(const enum 
>> hardware_error hw_err)
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> +static bool fault_inject_csc_hw_error(void)
>> +{
>> +    return should_fail(&inject_csc_hw_error, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void csc_hw_error_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>>     struct xe_tile *tile = container_of(work, typeof(*tile), 
>> csc_hw_error_work);
>> @@ -134,6 +142,9 @@ void xe_hw_error_irq_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, 
>> const u32 master_ctl)
>> {
>>     enum hardware_error hw_err;
>>
>> +    if (fault_inject_csc_hw_error())
>> +        schedule_work(&tile->csc_hw_error_work);
>> +
>>     for (hw_err = 0; hw_err < HARDWARE_ERROR_MAX; hw_err++)
>>         if (master_ctl & ERROR_IRQ(hw_err))
>>             hw_error_source_handler(tile, hw_err);
>> -- 
>> 2.47.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-09 11:20 [PATCH v4 0/9] Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 13:41   ` Simona Vetter
2025-07-09 14:09     ` Christian König
2025-07-09 14:18       ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-09 16:52         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-10  9:01           ` Simona Vetter
2025-07-10  9:37             ` Christian König
2025-07-10 10:24               ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-10 19:00                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-10 21:46                   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-11  5:17                     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-11  6:08                       ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-11  8:56                   ` Simona Vetter
2025-07-11  8:59               ` Simona Vetter
2025-07-14  5:27                 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-14 12:33                   ` Simona Vetter
2025-07-09 14:46     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/xe: Set GT as wedged before sending " Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:26   ` Matthew Brost
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/xe: Add a helper function to set recovery method Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Refactor survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Add support for Runtime " Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 23:44   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-10  5:59     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-10 17:12       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-11  5:23         ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability Riana Tauro
2025-07-11  5:39   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-11  6:09     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-12  5:45       ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-14  9:04         ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/xe: Add support to handle hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-10 21:09   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-11  5:35     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-11 17:34       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Handle CSC Firmware reported Hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-11  0:36   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-11  5:46     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-11 17:38       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-09 11:20 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler Riana Tauro
2025-07-11 17:41   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-07-14  7:07     ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2025-07-09 12:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors (rev4) Patchwork
2025-07-09 12:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-09 12:44 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-09 13:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-09 15:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa9b7c63-34cb-425b-9bf4-d45ee2920bb6@intel.com \
    --to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frank.scarbrough@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox