public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
	Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>, <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	<shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Rename survivability_mode to enable_survivability_mode
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 14:31:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afjl938sUW4yzYWF@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bjeve215.fsf@intel.com>

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 10:29:26AM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Rename the survivability_mode field in struct xe_config_device to
> > enable_survivability_mode to be consistent with the enable_psmi naming
> > convention used for similar boolean config flags.

I don't believe we need this level of consistency.

I'd like to keep the survivability_mode as is because perhaps we could
perhaps even expand to multiple different modes later instead of only
enable disable flag?!

Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> > Assisted-by: Copilot:claude-opus-4.7
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c           | 39 +++++++++++-----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h           |  4 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > index 32102600a148..69abc69ec0f3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
> >   *	│   └── ...
> >   *	:
> >   *	└── 0000:03:00.0
> > - *	    ├── survivability_mode
> > + *	    ├── enable_survivability_mode
> >   *	    ├── gt_types_allowed
> >   *	    ├── engines_allowed
> >   *	    └── enable_psmi
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
> >   * Enable survivability mode on supported cards. This setting only takes
> >   * effect when probing the device. Example to enable it::
> >   *
> > - *	# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/survivability_mode
> > + *	# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/enable_survivability_mode
> 
> I think we have not documented our configfs structure in the kernel ABI
> documentation.  Are we supposed to do that?  Is that not yet done
> because we do not consider our configfs stable enough to be classified
> as proper ABI?
> 
> In this example, we would be potentially changing what some would call
> ABI, hence my questions above.
> 
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
> 
> >   *
> >   * This attribute can only be set before binding to the device.
> >   *
> > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ struct xe_config_group_device {
> >  		u64 engines_allowed;
> >  		struct wa_bb ctx_restore_post_bb[XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX];
> >  		struct wa_bb ctx_restore_mid_bb[XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX];
> > -		bool survivability_mode;
> > +		bool enable_survivability_mode;
> >  		bool enable_psmi;
> >  		struct {
> >  			unsigned int max_vfs;
> > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ struct xe_config_group_device {
> >  static const struct xe_config_device device_defaults = {
> >  	.gt_types_allowed = U64_MAX,
> >  	.engines_allowed = U64_MAX,
> > -	.survivability_mode = false,
> > +	.enable_survivability_mode = false,
> >  	.enable_psmi = false,
> >  	.sriov = {
> >  		.max_vfs = XE_DEFAULT_MAX_VFS,
> > @@ -357,20 +357,21 @@ static bool is_bound(struct xe_config_group_device *dev)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static ssize_t survivability_mode_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
> > +static ssize_t enable_survivability_mode_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_config_device *dev = to_xe_config_device(item);
> >  
> > -	return sprintf(page, "%d\n", dev->survivability_mode);
> > +	return sprintf(page, "%d\n", dev->enable_survivability_mode);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static ssize_t survivability_mode_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page, size_t len)
> > +static ssize_t enable_survivability_mode_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page,
> > +					       size_t len)
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item);
> > -	bool survivability_mode;
> > +	bool enable_survivability_mode;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = kstrtobool(page, &survivability_mode);
> > +	ret = kstrtobool(page, &enable_survivability_mode);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@ static ssize_t survivability_mode_store(struct config_item *item, const char *pa
> >  	if (is_bound(dev))
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  
> > -	dev->config.survivability_mode = survivability_mode;
> > +	dev->config.enable_survivability_mode = enable_survivability_mode;
> >  
> >  	return len;
> >  }
> > @@ -815,7 +816,7 @@ CONFIGFS_ATTR(, ctx_restore_post_bb);
> >  CONFIGFS_ATTR(, enable_psmi);
> >  CONFIGFS_ATTR(, engines_allowed);
> >  CONFIGFS_ATTR(, gt_types_allowed);
> > -CONFIGFS_ATTR(, survivability_mode);
> > +CONFIGFS_ATTR(, enable_survivability_mode);
> >  
> >  static struct configfs_attribute *xe_config_device_attrs[] = {
> >  	&attr_ctx_restore_mid_bb,
> > @@ -823,7 +824,7 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *xe_config_device_attrs[] = {
> >  	&attr_enable_psmi,
> >  	&attr_engines_allowed,
> >  	&attr_gt_types_allowed,
> > -	&attr_survivability_mode,
> > +	&attr_enable_survivability_mode,
> >  	NULL,
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -847,7 +848,7 @@ static bool xe_config_device_is_visible(struct config_item *item,
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item);
> >  
> > -	if (attr == &attr_survivability_mode) {
> > +	if (attr == &attr_enable_survivability_mode) {
> >  		if (!dev->desc->is_dgfx || dev->desc->platform < XE_BATTLEMAGE)
> >  			return false;
> >  	}
> > @@ -1098,7 +1099,7 @@ static void dump_custom_dev_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >  	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%llx", gt_types_allowed);
> >  	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%llx", engines_allowed);
> >  	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%d", enable_psmi);
> > -	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%d", survivability_mode);
> > +	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%d", enable_survivability_mode);
> >  	PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%u", sriov.admin_only_pf);
> >  
> >  #undef PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR
> > @@ -1128,20 +1129,20 @@ void xe_configfs_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode - get configfs survivability mode attribute
> > + * xe_configfs_get_enable_survivability_mode - get configfs survivability mode attribute
> >   * @pdev: pci device
> >   *
> > - * Return: survivability_mode attribute in configfs
> > + * Return: enable_survivability_mode attribute in configfs
> >   */
> > -bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +bool xe_configfs_get_enable_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = find_xe_config_group_device(pdev);
> >  	bool mode;
> >  
> >  	if (!dev)
> > -		return device_defaults.survivability_mode;
> > +		return device_defaults.enable_survivability_mode;
> >  
> > -	mode = dev->config.survivability_mode;
> > +	mode = dev->config.enable_survivability_mode;
> >  	config_group_put(&dev->group);
> >  
> >  	return mode;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> > index 07d62bf0c152..517de4946d35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> >  int xe_configfs_init(void);
> >  void xe_configfs_exit(void);
> >  void xe_configfs_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > -bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > +bool xe_configfs_get_enable_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  bool xe_configfs_primary_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  bool xe_configfs_media_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ bool xe_configfs_admin_only_pf(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  static inline int xe_configfs_init(void) { return 0; }
> >  static inline void xe_configfs_exit(void) { }
> >  static inline void xe_configfs_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> > -static inline bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
> > +static inline bool xe_configfs_get_enable_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
> >  static inline bool xe_configfs_primary_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return true; }
> >  static inline bool xe_configfs_media_gt_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return true; }
> >  static inline u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return U64_MAX; }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> > index db64cac39c94..7c85bdb267af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
> > @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ bool xe_survivability_mode_is_requested(struct xe_device *xe)
> >  	if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || xe->info.platform < XE_BATTLEMAGE)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	survivability_mode = xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(pdev);
> > +	survivability_mode = xe_configfs_get_enable_survivability_mode(pdev);
> >  	/* Enable survivability mode if set via configfs */
> >  	if (survivability_mode)
> >  		return true;
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04  4:43 [PATCH 0/9] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Rename survivability_mode to enable_survivability_mode Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 13:29   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 14:32     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 14:38       ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 14:40     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 18:31     ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-05-04 18:38       ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe: Sort xe_config_device fields and defaults alphabetically Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 13:58   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 14:38     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 15:47   ` Lin, Shuicheng
2026-05-04 15:54     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Split out configfs data structures Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:52   ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  8:47   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-04 14:24     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 21:48       ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-04 21:51         ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Add a new debug focused configfs group Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 15:42   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 15:50     ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 17:28       ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 17:44         ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 19:04           ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-05 21:45       ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe: Move debug configfs entries to xe_configfs_debug.c Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/guc: Add configfs support for guc_log_level Stuart Summers
2026-05-05 23:54   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe/guc: Add support for NPK as a GuC log target Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for debug configfs parameters Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:43 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Migrate existing debug configfs entries to params infrastructure Stuart Summers
2026-05-04  4:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04  5:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-05-04  5:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-05-04  6:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-04  8:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afjl938sUW4yzYWF@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox