From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "Sousa, Gustavo" <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Wajdeczko, Michal" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Nerlige Ramappa, Umesh" <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
"Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Add a new debug focused configfs group
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 17:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dede21f05cac6e683c4f001a8cc31b883ba2810c.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873407dqxw.fsf@intel.com>
On Mon, 2026-05-04 at 14:28 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2026-05-04 at 12:42 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> > > Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Add the skeleton code for a new debug specific configfs group.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> > > > Assisted-by: Copilot:claude-opus-4.7
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 2 ++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c | 4 ++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.h | 8 ++++++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_types.h | 7 +++++++
> > > > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.c
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.h
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > index 09661f079d03..b58667b0b18e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_HWMON) += xe_hwmon.o
> > > >
> > > > xe-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += xe_pmu.o
> > > > xe-$(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS) += xe_configfs.o
> > > > +xe_debug_configfs_obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) :=
> > > > xe_configfs_debug.o
> > > > +xe-$(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS) += $(xe_debug_configfs_obj-y)
> > >
> > > What are the downsides of keeping this available for non-debug
> > > builds?
> > >
> > > I imagine that the debug configfs could be useful for someone not
> > > involved in kernel development working together with the
> > > developers
> > > to
> > > debug issues without needing to rebuild their kernel.
> >
> > So the focal parameter we had in i915 was enable_rc6. Something
> > like
> > this is what we explicitly don't want to expose to a general user
> > as it
> > can have unforeseen consequences (like having very high power
> > usage).
> > But, having the ability to disable rc6 for debug purposes as a
> > developer is extremely useful at narrowing down certain types of
> > bugs
> > at the hardware/software interface.
>
> We could probably keep the debug stuff available but cause a taint if
> they ever get used?
So the tainting is really just for our CI I think. This won't
necessarily impact end users - at least on the client side - who might
just ignore it (or not even notice it).
>
> The scenario I had in mind is someone who is not familiar with
> building
> their own kernel working together with the development community on a
> hard-to-reproduce issue and some of the debug configfs attributes
> being
> useful to gather more relevant data.
Yeah but IMO we really should be able to instruct such a user how to do
that - the steps there aren't too difficult if they're already
installing kernels etc.
A lot of our debug hooks are already held under various Kconfig options
anyway like DRM_XE_DEBUG, DRM_XE_DEBUG_GUC, DRM_XE_DEBUG_VM, etc. And a
lot of the information under those Kconfigs are also critical for
different debugs.
I'd really prefer to keep these under DRM_XE_DEBUG (or some other
Kconfig) if possible so we can maximize the ease of adding new
parameters as specific debugs come up.
Thanks,
Stuart
>
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
>
> >
> > That's just one example, but there are a bunch of things that could
> > fit
> > this category and I expect we'll have even more use cases over
> > time.
> >
> > Right now we have to hold these types of changes in a side branch
> > not
> > exposed externally and I really want to converge our processes so
> > we
> > can more easily make these kinds of changes and let us debug
> > directly
> > out of drm-tip.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > # graphics virtualization (SR-IOV) support
> > > > xe-y += \
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > > > index 12b7fe65446d..85df8ce5cf2a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> > > > @@ -1006,6 +1006,10 @@ static struct config_group
> > > > *xe_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *gro
> > > > config_group_init_type_name(&dev->sriov,
> > > > "sriov",
> > > > &xe_config_sriov_type);
> > > > configfs_add_default_group(&dev->sriov, &dev-
> > > > > group);
> > > > }
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
> > > > + config_group_init_type_name(&dev->debug, "debug",
> > > > &xe_configfs_debug_type);
> > > > + configfs_add_default_group(&dev->debug, &dev->group);
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > I guess there isn't much we can do about it today, but, based on
> > > what
> > > I
> > > read in configfs documentation a while ago, I suspect it wasn't
> > > really
> > > designed with arbitrary hierarchies of config items in mind. It
> > > would
> > > be nice if there was an API for that though.
> > >
> > > Basically, a config group is expected to be a directory to
> > > contain a
> > > set
> > > of config items of the same type, which is not the case on our
> > > current
> > > usage (i.e. the "sriov" and now the "debug" group).
> > >
> > > I guess we are able to get our desired behavior (basically just a
> > > subdirectory behaving as a config item) by not implementing the
> > > "make_item" hook. Not sure if that's an expected use of the API
> > > or
> > > if
> > > that's more of a hack on our side and could come back to bite us
> > > in
> > > the
> > > future.
> >
> > Hm.. ok that's good feedback. I do like bucketing these in groups
> > and
> > subdirectories. It also makes it easy to show or not show based on
> > the
> > Kconfig. But let me go through and make sure there isn't something
> > more
> > suited here. Happy to hear any other feedback as well here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stuart
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gustavo Sousa
> > >
> > > >
> > > > mutex_init(&dev->lock);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..45617282cec5
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/configfs.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "xe_configfs_debug.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_configfs_types.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +const struct config_item_type xe_configfs_debug_type = {
> > > > + .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > > +};
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..01170dc2f97e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_debug.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > > + */
> > > > +#ifndef _XE_CONFIGFS_DEBUG_H_
> > > > +#define _XE_CONFIGFS_DEBUG_H_
> > > > +
> > > > +#endif /* _XE_CONFIGFS_DEBUG_H_ */
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_types.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_types.h
> > > > index 935097aafa96..c9d94a3c26a7 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_types.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs_types.h
> > > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct wa_bb {
> > > > struct xe_config_group_device {
> > > > struct config_group group;
> > > > struct config_group sriov;
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
> > > > + struct config_group debug;
> > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > struct xe_config_device {
> > > > struct wa_bb
> > > > ctx_restore_mid_bb[XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX];
> > > > @@ -56,4 +59,8 @@ static inline struct xe_config_device
> > > > *xe_configfs_to_device(struct config_item
> > > > return &xe_configfs_to_group_device(item)->config;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
> > > > +extern const struct config_item_type xe_configfs_debug_type;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > #endif /* _XE_CONFIGFS_TYPES_H_ */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 4:43 [PATCH 0/9] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Rename survivability_mode to enable_survivability_mode Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 13:29 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 14:32 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 14:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 14:40 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 18:31 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-05-04 18:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe: Sort xe_config_device fields and defaults alphabetically Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 13:58 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 14:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 15:47 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2026-05-04 15:54 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Split out configfs data structures Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:52 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 8:47 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-04 14:24 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 21:48 ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-04 21:51 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Add a new debug focused configfs group Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 15:42 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 15:50 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 17:28 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-04 17:44 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2026-05-04 19:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-05 21:45 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe: Move debug configfs entries to xe_configfs_debug.c Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/guc: Add configfs support for guc_log_level Stuart Summers
2026-05-05 23:54 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe/guc: Add support for NPK as a GuC log target Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for debug configfs parameters Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:43 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Migrate existing debug configfs entries to params infrastructure Stuart Summers
2026-05-04 4:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Summers, Stuart
2026-05-04 5:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-05-04 5:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-05-04 6:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-04 8:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dede21f05cac6e683c4f001a8cc31b883ba2810c.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox