From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<koby.elbaz@intel.com>, <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handling for split VMA
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:20:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al7lbcjU8JsqasVE@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7baa79b5-a2e4-4064-8a19-c0f263a883e2@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 02:05:35PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/05/2026 13:51, Ilia Levi wrote:
> > The fault handler currently assumes it always operates on a VMA spanning
> > the entire GEM object. This does not hold when the VMA has been split,
> > e.g. by a partial munmap or mprotect. In that case the handler may map
> > wrong physical pages or cause SIGBUS.
> >
> > Change the fault handler to map only the GEM subrange corresponding to
> > the VMA, and do not set vm_pgoff to zero. Many DRM drivers do this
> > because helpers like dma_mmap_pages() interpret vm_pgoff as an
> > intra-buffer page offset; leaving the DRM fake offset there would break
> > these helpers. Those drivers can get away with zeroing it because they
> > map eagerly -- all PTEs are established before mmap returns, so vm_pgoff
> > is never consulted again. This driver does not use such helpers and
> > defers mapping to the fault handler, where vm_pgoff must be preserved:
> > when the kernel splits a VMA it adjusts vm_pgoff, and the fault handler
> > subtracts the GEM object's fake mmap offset to recover the page offset
> > within the object.
> >
> > Fixes: 1ffcf8b8ae8a ("drm/xe: Support for mmap-ing mmio regions")
> > Assisted-by: GitHub-Copilot:claude-opus-4.6
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>
>
> Would it work if we did something like:
>
> +static int xe_mmio_gem_vm_may_split(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned
> long addr)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> static const struct vm_operations_struct vm_ops = {
> .open = drm_gem_vm_open,
> .close = drm_gem_vm_close,
> .fault = xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault,
> + .may_split = xe_mmio_gem_vm_may_split,
> };
>
> ?
>
> I don't think partial unmap or similar is really a real use case for this
> type of special mapping. IMO if we can just reject that would be simplest?
> What do you think here?
>
+1 - I don't think split would really be a use case and most xe_mmio_gem
usages are likely exactly one page, right?
Matt
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> > index c22a38e5616b..15e884ad3f1c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *);
> > struct xe_mmio_gem {
> > struct drm_gem_object base;
> > phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> > + unsigned long pgoff;
> > };
> > static const struct vm_operations_struct vm_ops = {
> > @@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ struct xe_mmio_gem *xe_mmio_gem_create(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_file *fi
> > if (err)
> > goto free_gem;
> > + obj->pgoff = drm_vma_node_start(&base->vma_node);
> > +
> > err = drm_vma_node_allow(&base->vma_node, file);
> > if (err)
> > goto free_gem;
> > @@ -147,8 +150,6 @@ static int xe_mmio_gem_mmap(struct drm_gem_object *base, struct vm_area_struct *
> > if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) == 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - /* Set vm_pgoff (used as a fake buffer offset by DRM) to 0 */
> > - vma->vm_pgoff = 0;
> > vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vm_get_page_prot(vma->vm_flags));
> > vm_flags_set(vma, VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP |
> > VM_DONTCOPY | VM_NORESERVE);
> > @@ -190,7 +191,8 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > struct xe_mmio_gem *obj = to_xe_mmio_gem(base);
> > struct drm_device *dev = base->dev;
> > vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> > - unsigned long i;
> > + unsigned long addr, pfn;
> > + unsigned long pgoff;
> > int idx;
> > if (!drm_dev_enter(dev, &idx)) {
> > @@ -203,13 +205,15 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > return xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault_dummy_page(vmf);
> > }
> > - for (i = 0; i < base->size; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > - unsigned long addr = vma->vm_start + i;
> > - unsigned long phys_addr = obj->phys_addr + i;
> > + pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff - obj->pgoff;
> > + pfn = PHYS_PFN(obj->phys_addr) + pgoff;
> > - ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, PHYS_PFN(phys_addr));
> > + for (addr = vma->vm_start; addr < vma->vm_end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > + ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, pfn);
> > if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
> > break;
> > +
> > + pfn++;
> > }
> > drm_dev_exit(idx);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 12:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: use write-back mapping for dummy page Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handling for split VMA Ilia Levi
2026-07-15 13:05 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-21 3:20 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-07-21 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-21 11:49 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-07-21 13:19 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-21 17:35 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-21 18:45 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: Revoke drm_vma_node on xe_mmio_gem destroy Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: cache the dummy page per object Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix destroy flow Ilia Levi
2026-07-16 15:22 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-21 9:15 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-21 15:00 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-05-26 12:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-26 13:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-26 15:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-07-16 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al7lbcjU8JsqasVE@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=ilia.levi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=koby.elbaz@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox