* [PATCH] drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
@ 2026-08-08 14:49 Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 16:25 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
2026-08-24 19:36 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guangshuo Li @ 2026-08-08 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Brost, Thomas Hellström, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, intel-xe, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Cc: Guangshuo Li, stable
xe_pm_runtime_init() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but
xe_pm_runtime_fini() does not call the matching
pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() during teardown.
If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
during teardown, this reference is not dropped.
The documentation for pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() also notes that it
is important to undo it with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() at
driver exit time, unless runtime PM was initially enabled with
devm_pm_runtime_enable().
Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() call to the runtime
PM teardown path.
This issue was found by manual code inspection.
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
index 99562f691080..301789adaa21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
@@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static void xe_pm_runtime_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
return;
+ pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
2026-08-08 14:49 [PATCH] drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown Guangshuo Li
@ 2026-08-08 16:25 ` Patchwork
2026-08-24 19:36 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2026-08-08 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guangshuo Li; +Cc: intel-xe
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/171838/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series author address 'lgs201920130244@gmail.com' is not on the allowlist, which prevents CI from being automatically triggered.
If you want CI to run for this series, ask Patchwork project owners to click 'retest' on the series in Patchwork.
Exception occurred during validation, bailing out!
Build URL: http://intel-gfx-ci-public.igk.intel.com:8080/job/xe_pw_trigger/1241151/ (on master)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
2026-08-08 14:49 [PATCH] drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 16:25 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2026-08-24 19:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2026-08-24 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guangshuo Li
Cc: Matthew Brost, Thomas Hellström, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
intel-xe, dri-devel, linux-kernel, stable
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 10:49:07PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> xe_pm_runtime_init() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but
> xe_pm_runtime_fini() does not call the matching
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() during teardown.
>
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> during teardown, this reference is not dropped.
>
> The documentation for pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() also notes that it
> is important to undo it with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() at
> driver exit time, unless runtime PM was initially enabled with
> devm_pm_runtime_enable().
>
> Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() call to the runtime
> PM teardown path.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
Thanks for your contribution, but I believe this needs further explanation.
I only see this function getting used in pair with the _enable and _disable
never paierd with _allowed _forbid pair... Why in this case we would need
this?
>
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 99562f691080..301789adaa21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static void xe_pm_runtime_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> return;
>
> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-24 19:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-08 14:49 [PATCH] drm/xe: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 16:25 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
2026-08-24 19:36 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox