From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <hansg@kernel.org>,
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<simona@ffwll.ch>, <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
<anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <james.ausmus@intel.com>,
<karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:58:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqgZj4S_meH4YbMa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911201148.1610547-39-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 01:12:05PM -0700, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> CRI FW is loaded on power on. Because of this, access to the FW cannot
> be done until it is running.
>
> Update the XE PMT probe and access to check for late bind devices,
> verify, and wait for the appropriate FW state before probe or access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 3ec950606e67..a2c8c7909688 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1053,7 +1053,9 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> goto err_unregister_display;
>
> - xe_vsec_init(xe);
> + err = xe_vsec_init(xe);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_unregister_display;
>
> xe_debugfs_register(xe);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index ebdc271ebeae..67dd786e202b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #define _XE_DEVICE_TYPES_H_
>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_device.h>
> #include <drm/drm_file.h>
> @@ -475,6 +476,10 @@ struct xe_device {
> struct mutex lock;
> /** @pmt.base_offset: device specific base offset */
> u64 base_offset;
> + /** @pmt.work: support late-bind probe */
> + struct delayed_work work;
> + /** @pmt.retry_count: late-bind probe retry */
> + u32 retry_count;
> } pmt;
>
> /** @soc_remapper: SoC remapper object */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> index cb3d9142346c..c2f527e7894a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> #include "xe_platform_types.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
> #include "xe_vsec.h"
>
> #include "regs/xe_pmt.h"
> @@ -173,6 +175,14 @@ enum capability {
> WATCHER,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Late bind will delay 100msec for up to 20 seconds
> + */
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC 100
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY 200
> +
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> static int bmg_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
> {
> u32 record_id = FIELD_GET(GUID_RECORD_ID, guid);
> @@ -281,6 +291,48 @@ static int xe_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(work, struct xe_device, pmt.work.work);
> +
> + if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {
ditto
> + cri_late_bind_probe(xe);
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xe->pmt.retry_count++;
> +
> + /* wait up to 20 seconds */
> + if (xe->pmt.retry_count == VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY) {
> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "PMT probe: Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work, msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC)))
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> +static bool wait_for_fw(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + int retries = VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY; /* wait up to 20 secs */
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform != XE_CRESCENTISLAND)
> + return true;
> +
> + while (retries--) {
> + if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe))
ditto
> + return true;
> +
> + msleep(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC);
> + }
> +
> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_pmt_telem_read - Given a device and a PMT GUID, read data into a buffer
> * @dev: valid Xe device
> @@ -345,6 +397,11 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
> goto dev_exit;
> }
>
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> /* set SoC re-mapper index register based on GUID memory region */
> @@ -354,6 +411,7 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -396,6 +454,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
> disc_addr += inst + offset;
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -403,6 +465,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
> *reg = readl(disc_addr);
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -433,6 +497,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
> disc_addr += inst + offset;
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -440,6 +508,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
> writel(reg, disc_addr);
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -471,12 +541,44 @@ static enum xe_vsec get_platform_info(struct xe_device *xe)
> return vsec_platforms[xe->info.platform];
> }
>
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
> + struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> + enum xe_vsec platform;
> +
> + platform = get_platform_info(xe);
> + if (platform != XE_VSEC_CRI)
> + return;
> +
> + info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
> + if (!info->headers)
> + return;
> +
> + info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> + xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
don't we need to wrap this around the xe->pmt.lock?
> +
> + intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +}
yet on the probe, please address Sashiko's race.
Although ulikely we should protect here...
probably adding a devmanaged removal with the work cancellation
> +
> +static void vsec_disable_late_bind_work(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the queued work is canceled, the runtime reference needs to be
> + * released here.
> + */
> + if (disable_delayed_work_sync(&xe->pmt.work))
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_vsec_init - Initialize resources and add intel_vsec auxiliary
> * interface
> * @xe: valid xe instance
> */
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
> struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> @@ -484,30 +586,45 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> platform = get_platform_info(xe);
> if (platform == XE_VSEC_UNKNOWN)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
> if (!info->headers)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> switch (platform) {
> case XE_VSEC_BMG:
> if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> - return;
> + return 0;
> xe->pmt.base_offset = BMG_TELEMETRY_OFFSET;
> info->priv_data = &xe_bmg_pmt_cb;
> break;
>
> case XE_VSEC_CRI:
> if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> - return;
> + return 0;
> +
> xe->pmt.base_offset = CRI_PMT_OFFSET;
> +
> + xe->pmt.retry_count = 0;
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&xe->pmt.work, cri_late_bind_probe_work);
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
why get_noresume? I believe here we are in the outter bound callers, hence
the regular get seems better, no?!
> + if (!xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {
xe_sysctrl_is_oobmsm_fw_ready ?!
Please ensure that all patches compile individually so don't break bisect flows.
> + schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC));
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev,
> + vsec_disable_late_bind_work,
> + xe);
> + }
> +
> info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> break;
>
> default:
> - break;
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "Unsupported platform: %u\n", platform);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -515,5 +632,10 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> * resources.
> */
> intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +
> + if (platform == XE_VSEC_CRI)
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> MODULE_IMPORT_NS("INTEL_VSEC");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> index a25b4e6e681b..c4a1e2fc67d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> struct device;
> struct xe_device;
>
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offset, u32 count);
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 20:11 [PATCH v8 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:05 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:16 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-14 21:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:04 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-14 21:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:35 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:33 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-16 13:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update VSEC probe order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:01 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 15:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-09-14 21:15 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-15 13:14 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev10) Patchwork
2026-09-11 20:44 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqgZj4S_meH4YbMa@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.ausmus@intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox