Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <hansg@kernel.org>,
	<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
	<simona@ffwll.ch>, <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
	<anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <james.ausmus@intel.com>,
	<karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:58:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqgZj4S_meH4YbMa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911201148.1610547-39-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 01:12:05PM -0700, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> CRI FW is loaded on power on.  Because of this, access to the FW cannot
> be done until it is running.
> 
> Update the XE PMT probe and access to check for late bind devices,
> verify, and wait for the appropriate FW state before probe or access.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c       |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |   5 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c         | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h         |   2 +-
>  4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 3ec950606e67..a2c8c7909688 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1053,7 +1053,9 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err_unregister_display;
>  
> -	xe_vsec_init(xe);
> +	err = xe_vsec_init(xe);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_unregister_display;
>  
>  	xe_debugfs_register(xe);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index ebdc271ebeae..67dd786e202b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #define _XE_DEVICE_TYPES_H_
>  
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  
>  #include <drm/drm_device.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_file.h>
> @@ -475,6 +476,10 @@ struct xe_device {
>  		struct mutex lock;
>  		/** @pmt.base_offset: device specific base offset */
>  		u64 base_offset;
> +		/** @pmt.work: support late-bind probe */
> +		struct delayed_work work;
> +		/** @pmt.retry_count: late-bind probe retry */
> +		u32 retry_count;
>  	} pmt;
>  
>  	/** @soc_remapper: SoC remapper object */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> index cb3d9142346c..c2f527e7894a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include "xe_mmio.h"
>  #include "xe_platform_types.h"
>  #include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
>  #include "xe_vsec.h"
>  
>  #include "regs/xe_pmt.h"
> @@ -173,6 +175,14 @@ enum capability {
>  	WATCHER,
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Late bind will delay 100msec for up to 20 seconds
> + */
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC	100
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY		200
> +
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
>  static int bmg_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
>  {
>  	u32 record_id = FIELD_GET(GUID_RECORD_ID, guid);
> @@ -281,6 +291,48 @@ static int xe_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  }
>  
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(work, struct xe_device, pmt.work.work);
> +
> +	if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {

ditto

> +		cri_late_bind_probe(xe);
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	xe->pmt.retry_count++;
> +
> +	/* wait up to 20 seconds */
> +	if (xe->pmt.retry_count == VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY) {
> +		drm_warn(&xe->drm, "PMT probe: Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work, msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC)))
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> +static bool wait_for_fw(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	int retries = VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY;  /* wait up to 20 secs */
> +
> +	if (xe->info.platform != XE_CRESCENTISLAND)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	while (retries--) {
> +		if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe))

ditto

> +			return true;
> +
> +		msleep(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC);
> +	}
> +
> +	drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * xe_pmt_telem_read - Given a device and a PMT GUID, read data into a buffer
>   * @dev: valid Xe device
> @@ -345,6 +397,11 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
>  		goto dev_exit;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> +		ret = -ENODATA;
> +		goto runtime_exit;
> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>  
>  	/* set SoC re-mapper index register based on GUID memory region */
> @@ -354,6 +411,7 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>  
> +runtime_exit:
>  	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>  
>  dev_exit:
> @@ -396,6 +454,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
>  	disc_addr += inst + offset;
>  
>  	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> +		ret = -ENODATA;
> +		goto runtime_exit;
> +	}
>  	mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>  
>  	xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -403,6 +465,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
>  	*reg = readl(disc_addr);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
>  	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>  
>  dev_exit:
> @@ -433,6 +497,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
>  	disc_addr += inst + offset;
>  
>  	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> +		ret = -ENODATA;
> +		goto runtime_exit;
> +	}
>  	mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>  
>  	xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -440,6 +508,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
>  	writel(reg, disc_addr);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
>  	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>  
>  dev_exit:
> @@ -471,12 +541,44 @@ static enum xe_vsec get_platform_info(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return vsec_platforms[xe->info.platform];
>  }
>  
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
> +	struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> +	enum xe_vsec platform;
> +
> +	platform = get_platform_info(xe);
> +	if (platform != XE_VSEC_CRI)
> +		return;
> +
> +	info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
> +	if (!info->headers)
> +		return;
> +
> +	info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> +	xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);

don't we need to wrap this around the xe->pmt.lock?

> +
> +	intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +}

yet on the probe, please address Sashiko's race.

Although ulikely we should protect here...
probably adding a devmanaged removal with the work cancellation

> +
> +static void vsec_disable_late_bind_work(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the queued work is canceled, the runtime reference needs to be
> +	 * released here.
> +	 */
> +	if (disable_delayed_work_sync(&xe->pmt.work))
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * xe_vsec_init - Initialize resources and add intel_vsec auxiliary
>   * interface
>   * @xe: valid xe instance
>   */
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>  	struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
>  	struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> @@ -484,30 +586,45 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	platform = get_platform_info(xe);
>  	if (platform == XE_VSEC_UNKNOWN)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
>  	if (!info->headers)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	switch (platform) {
>  	case XE_VSEC_BMG:
>  		if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> -			return;
> +			return 0;
>  		xe->pmt.base_offset = BMG_TELEMETRY_OFFSET;
>  		info->priv_data = &xe_bmg_pmt_cb;
>  		break;
>  
>  	case XE_VSEC_CRI:
>  		if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> -			return;
> +			return 0;
> +
>  		xe->pmt.base_offset = CRI_PMT_OFFSET;
> +
> +		xe->pmt.retry_count = 0;
> +		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&xe->pmt.work, cri_late_bind_probe_work);
> +
> +		xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);

why get_noresume? I believe here we are in the outter bound callers, hence
the regular get seems better, no?!

> +		if (!xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {

xe_sysctrl_is_oobmsm_fw_ready ?!

Please ensure that all patches compile individually so don't break bisect flows.

> +			schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work,
> +					      msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC));
> +			return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev,
> +							vsec_disable_late_bind_work,
> +							xe);
> +		}
> +
>  		info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
>  		xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> -		break;
> +		drm_err(&xe->drm, "Unsupported platform: %u\n", platform);
> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -515,5 +632,10 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	 * resources.
>  	 */
>  	intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +
> +	if (platform == XE_VSEC_CRI)
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  MODULE_IMPORT_NS("INTEL_VSEC");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> index a25b4e6e681b..c4a1e2fc67d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>  struct device;
>  struct xe_device;
>  
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offset, u32 count);
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 20:11 [PATCH v8 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:00   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:03   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:05     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:06     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:16       ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-14 21:23         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:04     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-14 21:15       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:35         ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:33     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-16 13:10       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:11   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update VSEC probe order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:12   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-14 21:01     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:12   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-14 16:14   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 15:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-09-14 21:15     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-15 13:14     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCH v8 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-11 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev10) Patchwork
2026-09-11 20:44 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqgZj4S_meH4YbMa@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.ausmus@intel.com \
    --cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox