Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID

[Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 06:21:21PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 09:56:08AM -0700, Violet Monti wrote:
> > A new PCI ID for PTL.
> > 
> > Bspec: 72574
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>
> 
> I honestly believe it would be better and faster if you had just reviewed
> the version that Matt sent yesterday instead of resending it.

The reason for my resubmission was to rerun the CI results after a KUnit
failure unrelated to the PCI ID change. Matt is out for this week, and
delegated this patch to me to review and handle in his absence. Since I
am not the owner of the original submission, I was not able to rerun the
tests using the resubmit.

Is there a preferred method for re-testing patches that have been
delegated, such as situations like this?

Violet
> 
> > ---
> >  include/drm/intel/pciids.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > index dff389b56eb3..32c88a690ad8 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > @@ -880,6 +880,7 @@
> >  	MACRO__(0xB08F, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> >  	MACRO__(0xB090, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> >  	MACRO__(0xB0A0, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> > +	MACRO__(0xB0A1, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> >  	MACRO__(0xB0B0, ## __VA_ARGS__)
> >  
> >  /* WCL */
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> >