From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:06:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arcahvIqBmCytAmw@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arQIKbgr4QbAJ-Lj@vmonti-desk>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 10:11:05AM -0700, Violet Monti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 06:21:21PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 09:56:08AM -0700, Violet Monti wrote:
> > > A new PCI ID for PTL.
> > >
> > > Bspec: 72574
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>
> >
> > I honestly believe it would be better and faster if you had just reviewed
> > the version that Matt sent yesterday instead of resending it.
>
> The reason for my resubmission was to rerun the CI results after a KUnit
> failure unrelated to the PCI ID change. Matt is out for this week, and
> delegated this patch to me to review and handle in his absence. Since I
> am not the owner of the original submission, I was not able to rerun the
> tests using the resubmit.
>
> Is there a preferred method for re-testing patches that have been
> delegated, such as situations like this?
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
and pushed. Thanks for the patch and diligence.
>
> Violet
> >
> > > ---
> > > include/drm/intel/pciids.h | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > > index dff389b56eb3..32c88a690ad8 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
> > > @@ -880,6 +880,7 @@
> > > MACRO__(0xB08F, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> > > MACRO__(0xB090, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> > > MACRO__(0xB0A0, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> > > + MACRO__(0xB0A1, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
> > > MACRO__(0xB0B0, ## __VA_ARGS__)
> > >
> > > /* WCL */
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-26 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 16:56 [PATCH] drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID Violet Monti
2026-09-22 17:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-22 19:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-22 22:21 ` [PATCH] drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-23 17:11 ` Violet Monti
2026-09-26 1:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-10-01 12:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-01 12:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-23 5:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID (rev2) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-18 18:19 [PATCH] drm/xe/ptl: Add a new PTL PCI ID Matt Atwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arcahvIqBmCytAmw@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
--cc=violet.monti@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox