From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/mocs: Check that MOCS table.ops is assigned
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc86de52-01a2-478d-917e-60bdb04860e2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626211256.1620889-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On 26.06.2024 23:12, Matt Roper wrote:
> When MOCS debugfs dumping was added in commit 9fbd0adbcbe8
> ("drm/xe/mocs: Add debugfs node to dump mocs"), a sanity check was added
> to xe_mocs_dump() to ensure table.ops->dump is not a NULL pointer. The
> more common programmer mistake when adding MOCS enablement for new
> platforms is to simply forget to assign anything to table.ops
> altogether. Extend the check to also cover a NULL table.ops and add a
> WARN() so that CI will help us catch these mistakes when new platforms
> are enabled in the future.
but for the programming mistakes, shouldn't we use xe_assert() instead?
and in get_mocs_settings() there is already:
xe_assert(xe, !info->ops || info->ops->dump);
maybe it just needs to be updated?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
> index de3f2d3f1b04..d43900d351f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ void xe_mocs_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>
> flags = get_mocs_settings(xe, &table);
>
> - if (!table.ops->dump)
> + if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, !table.ops || !table.ops->dump))
> return;
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 21:12 [PATCH] drm/xe/mocs: Check that MOCS table.ops is assigned Matt Roper
2024-06-26 21:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-06-27 19:51 ` Matt Roper
2024-06-26 22:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-06-26 22:38 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-26 22:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-26 22:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-26 22:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-06-26 23:01 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-06-26 23:24 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-27 10:33 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc86de52-01a2-478d-917e-60bdb04860e2@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox