From: "Wang, X" <x.wang@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:20:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c42a6636-c639-4c4c-93a7-3755baf351bf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224220548.GL4694@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 2/24/2026 14:05, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:33:54PM -0800, Xin Wang wrote:
>> Tighten uapi validation to restrict multi-lrc support to VIDEO_DECODE and
>> VIDEO_ENHANCE engines only. This check should have been in place from the
>> start, as the driver typically avoids allowing uapi cases that we have
>> no userspace consumer for.
>>
>> Additionally, the GuC firmware on ModSched platforms no longer supports
>> multi-lrc on non-media engines.
>>
>> V3:
>> - store a multi-lrc enable class mask in xe->info and populate from
>> xe_device_desc in xe_pci.c (Matthew Brost)
>>
>> V2:
>> - correct the typo (Shuicheng)
>> - move the check earlier to avoid VM lookup (Shuicheng, Matt Roper)
>> - remove the graphics version check (Matt Roper)
>> - input more details in the commit info (Matt Roper)
>>
>> Cc: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 5 +++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> index 8f3ef836541e..caa8f34a6744 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ struct xe_device {
>> u8 tile_count;
>> /** @info.max_gt_per_tile: Number of GT IDs allocated to each tile */
>> u8 max_gt_per_tile;
>> + /** @info.multi_lrc_mask: bitmask of engine classes which support multi-lrc */
>> + u8 multi_lrc_mask;
>> /** @info.gt_count: Total number of GTs for entire device */
>> u8 gt_count;
>> /** @info.vm_max_level: Max VM level */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> index 66d0e10ee2c4..5abb29454d1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> @@ -1184,6 +1184,11 @@ int xe_exec_queue_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !hwe))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + /* multi-lrc is only supported on select engine classes */
>> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->width > 1 &&
>> + !(xe->info.multi_lrc_mask & BIT(hwe->class))))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> vm = xe_vm_lookup(xef, args->vm_id);
>> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !vm))
>> return -ENOENT;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> index e1f569235d8a..fe63387d4077 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc tgl_desc = {
>> .has_llc = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
> Is there a reason why some platforms list both VCS + VECS but others
> only list VCS? The new .multi_lrc_mask is intended to restrict usage to
> just the engine type(s) where we have a real userspace consumer, and for
> now I'd expect that to be the same across all current platforms. We
> should double check whether the media driver is actively using this on
> both media engine types or just one of them (I don't know off the top of
> my head), and then set the mask accordingly.
>
> An ioctl request for multi-LRC might also get rejected on a platform if
> the engine fusing indicates that there aren't 2+ engines of the given
> type, but that's an orthogonal check that's independent of the
> multi_lrc_mask we're defining here. Finding out how many engines
> actually exist on a device is something that we can only find out at
> runtime after reading the fuse registers for a specific device.
>
>
> Matt
I checked the specs and found that some devices have fewer than two VCS
or VCES
instances. In these cases, I don't think it's necessary to allow
multi-LRC to
those engines. This would prevent the injection of some illegal ioctl
parameters.
Xin
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 48,
>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>> @@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc rkl_desc = {
>> .has_display = true,
>> .has_llc = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 48,
>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_s_desc = {
>> .has_llc = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_ALDERLAKE_S_RPLS, "RPLS", adls_rpls_ids },
>> @@ -246,6 +249,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_p_desc = {
>> .has_llc = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_ALDERLAKE_P_RPLU, "RPLU", adlp_rplu_ids },
>> @@ -283,6 +287,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg1_desc = {
>> .has_gsc_nvm = 1,
>> .has_heci_gscfi = 1,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 48,
>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>> @@ -313,6 +318,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc ats_m_desc = {
>> .pre_gmdid_media_ip = &media_ip_xehpm,
>> .dma_mask_size = 46,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>
>> DG2_FEATURES,
>> @@ -325,6 +332,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg2_desc = {
>> .pre_gmdid_media_ip = &media_ip_xehpm,
>> .dma_mask_size = 46,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>
>> DG2_FEATURES,
>> @@ -358,6 +367,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc mtl_desc = {
>> .has_display = true,
>> .has_pxp = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>> .va_bits = 48,
>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>> };
>> @@ -393,6 +403,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc bmg_desc = {
>> .has_soc_remapper_telem = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>> .needs_scratch = true,
>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_BATTLEMAGE_G21, "G21", bmg_g21_ids },
>> @@ -445,6 +457,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc cri_desc = {
>> .has_soc_remapper_telem = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 57,
>> .vm_max_level = 4,
>> @@ -459,6 +473,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc nvlp_desc = {
>> .has_page_reclaim_hw_assist = true,
>> .has_pre_prod_wa = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 48,
>> .vm_max_level = 4,
>> @@ -746,6 +762,7 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>> xe->info.skip_pcode = desc->skip_pcode;
>> xe->info.needs_scratch = desc->needs_scratch;
>> xe->info.needs_shared_vf_gt_wq = desc->needs_shared_vf_gt_wq;
>> + xe->info.multi_lrc_mask = desc->multi_lrc_mask;
>>
>> xe->info.probe_display = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) &&
>> xe_modparam.probe_display &&
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>> index 470d31a1f0d6..47e8a1552c2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
>> u8 dma_mask_size;
>> u8 max_remote_tiles:2;
>> u8 max_gt_per_tile:2;
>> + u8 multi_lrc_mask;
>> u8 va_bits;
>> u8 vm_max_level;
>> u8 vram_flags;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 2:33 [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines Xin Wang
2026-02-24 2:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-24 22:05 ` [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines Matt Roper
2026-02-24 22:20 ` Wang, X [this message]
2026-02-24 22:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-24 22:57 ` Wang, X
2026-02-24 23:03 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c42a6636-c639-4c4c-93a7-3755baf351bf@intel.com \
--to=x.wang@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox