From: "Wang, X" <x.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:57:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c814ab36-0861-43c4-924e-4a6cdaa11376@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ4o4/T7BiPP3TeC@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
On 2/24/2026 14:40, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 02:20:33PM -0800, Wang, X wrote:
>> On 2/24/2026 14:05, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:33:54PM -0800, Xin Wang wrote:
>>>> Tighten uapi validation to restrict multi-lrc support to VIDEO_DECODE and
>>>> VIDEO_ENHANCE engines only. This check should have been in place from the
>>>> start, as the driver typically avoids allowing uapi cases that we have
>>>> no userspace consumer for.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, the GuC firmware on ModSched platforms no longer supports
>>>> multi-lrc on non-media engines.
>>>>
>>>> V3:
>>>> - store a multi-lrc enable class mask in xe->info and populate from
>>>> xe_device_desc in xe_pci.c (Matthew Brost)
>>>>
>>>> V2:
>>>> - correct the typo (Shuicheng)
>>>> - move the check earlier to avoid VM lookup (Shuicheng, Matt Roper)
>>>> - remove the graphics version check (Matt Roper)
>>>> - input more details in the commit info (Matt Roper)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 5 +++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h | 1 +
>>>> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> index 8f3ef836541e..caa8f34a6744 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ struct xe_device {
>>>> u8 tile_count;
>>>> /** @info.max_gt_per_tile: Number of GT IDs allocated to each tile */
>>>> u8 max_gt_per_tile;
>>>> + /** @info.multi_lrc_mask: bitmask of engine classes which support multi-lrc */
>>>> + u8 multi_lrc_mask;
>>>> /** @info.gt_count: Total number of GTs for entire device */
>>>> u8 gt_count;
>>>> /** @info.vm_max_level: Max VM level */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>>>> index 66d0e10ee2c4..5abb29454d1f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>>>> @@ -1184,6 +1184,11 @@ int xe_exec_queue_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>>> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !hwe))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> + /* multi-lrc is only supported on select engine classes */
>>>> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->width > 1 &&
>>>> + !(xe->info.multi_lrc_mask & BIT(hwe->class))))
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> +
>>>> vm = xe_vm_lookup(xef, args->vm_id);
>>>> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !vm))
>>>> return -ENOENT;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> index e1f569235d8a..fe63387d4077 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc tgl_desc = {
>>>> .has_llc = true,
>>>> .has_sriov = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>> Is there a reason why some platforms list both VCS + VECS but others
>>> only list VCS? The new .multi_lrc_mask is intended to restrict usage to
>>> just the engine type(s) where we have a real userspace consumer, and for
>>> now I'd expect that to be the same across all current platforms. We
> Matt R beat me to this suggestion too, +1.
>
>>> should double check whether the media driver is actively using this on
>>> both media engine types or just one of them (I don't know off the top of
>>> my head), and then set the mask accordingly.
>>>
>>> An ioctl request for multi-LRC might also get rejected on a platform if
>>> the engine fusing indicates that there aren't 2+ engines of the given
>>> type, but that's an orthogonal check that's independent of the
>>> multi_lrc_mask we're defining here. Finding out how many engines
>>> actually exist on a device is something that we can only find out at
>>> runtime after reading the fuse registers for a specific device.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>> I checked the specs and found that some devices have fewer than two VCS or
>> VCES
>> instances. In these cases, I don't think it's necessary to allow multi-LRC
>> to
>> those engines. This would prevent the injection of some illegal ioctl
>> parameters.
> See Matt's response above, we check in the IOCTL how many engines the
> platform has, if it only has 1 the IOCTL will prevent multi-LRC queue
> from being created.
>
> So again, I'd just enable XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE |
> XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE on platforms.
>
> Matt
This means we can enable the VCS/VECS multi-lrc on all platforms without
considering the number of engines. I can create a macro definition and add
it to all current platforms.
#define MULTI_LRC_MASK \
.multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) | \
BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE)
My understanding is that the advantage of adding a mask for each platform
is that if we need to support multi-LRC for more engines in the future,
we can simply modify the platform's xe_device_desc without changing the
code logic.
Xin
>> Xin
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .va_bits = 48,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>>>> @@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc rkl_desc = {
>>>> .has_display = true,
>>>> .has_llc = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .va_bits = 48,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>>>> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_s_desc = {
>>>> .has_llc = true,
>>>> .has_sriov = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>>>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_ALDERLAKE_S_RPLS, "RPLS", adls_rpls_ids },
>>>> @@ -246,6 +249,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_p_desc = {
>>>> .has_llc = true,
>>>> .has_sriov = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>>>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_ALDERLAKE_P_RPLU, "RPLU", adlp_rplu_ids },
>>>> @@ -283,6 +287,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg1_desc = {
>>>> .has_gsc_nvm = 1,
>>>> .has_heci_gscfi = 1,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .va_bits = 48,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>>>> @@ -313,6 +318,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc ats_m_desc = {
>>>> .pre_gmdid_media_ip = &media_ip_xehpm,
>>>> .dma_mask_size = 46,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>>>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> DG2_FEATURES,
>>>> @@ -325,6 +332,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg2_desc = {
>>>> .pre_gmdid_media_ip = &media_ip_xehpm,
>>>> .dma_mask_size = 46,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>>>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> DG2_FEATURES,
>>>> @@ -358,6 +367,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc mtl_desc = {
>>>> .has_display = true,
>>>> .has_pxp = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE),
>>>> .va_bits = 48,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 3,
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -393,6 +403,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc bmg_desc = {
>>>> .has_soc_remapper_telem = true,
>>>> .has_sriov = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>>>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>>>> .needs_scratch = true,
>>>> .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) {
>>>> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_BATTLEMAGE_G21, "G21", bmg_g21_ids },
>>>> @@ -445,6 +457,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc cri_desc = {
>>>> .has_soc_remapper_telem = true,
>>>> .has_sriov = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>>>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .va_bits = 57,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 4,
>>>> @@ -459,6 +473,8 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc nvlp_desc = {
>>>> .has_page_reclaim_hw_assist = true,
>>>> .has_pre_prod_wa = true,
>>>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>>>> + .multi_lrc_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE) |
>>>> + BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE),
>>>> .require_force_probe = true,
>>>> .va_bits = 48,
>>>> .vm_max_level = 4,
>>>> @@ -746,6 +762,7 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>>>> xe->info.skip_pcode = desc->skip_pcode;
>>>> xe->info.needs_scratch = desc->needs_scratch;
>>>> xe->info.needs_shared_vf_gt_wq = desc->needs_shared_vf_gt_wq;
>>>> + xe->info.multi_lrc_mask = desc->multi_lrc_mask;
>>>> xe->info.probe_display = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) &&
>>>> xe_modparam.probe_display &&
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>>>> index 470d31a1f0d6..47e8a1552c2b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
>>>> u8 dma_mask_size;
>>>> u8 max_remote_tiles:2;
>>>> u8 max_gt_per_tile:2;
>>>> + u8 multi_lrc_mask;
>>>> u8 va_bits;
>>>> u8 vm_max_level;
>>>> u8 vram_flags;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 2:33 [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines Xin Wang
2026-02-24 2:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-24 22:05 ` [PATCH v3] drm/xe: restrict multi-lrc to VCS/VECS engines Matt Roper
2026-02-24 22:20 ` Wang, X
2026-02-24 22:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-24 22:57 ` Wang, X [this message]
2026-02-24 23:03 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c814ab36-0861-43c4-924e-4a6cdaa11376@intel.com \
--to=x.wang@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox