Re: ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery, remove MMIO assert

[Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>]

On 08.11.2024 23:16, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery, remove MMIO assert
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141058/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-2181-6f358787ded211657532e2ee4df2e446b03d860f_full -> xe-pw-141058v1_full
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-141058v1_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in xe-pw-141058v1_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-141058v1_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 

all unrelated, 2x KMS

>   * igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-y-tiled-reflect-x-90:
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-141058v1/shard-dg2-466/igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-y-tiled-reflect-x-90.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_vblank@query-forked-hang@pipe-d-dp-2:
>     - shard-bmg:          [PASS][2] -> [INCOMPLETE][3] +1 other test incomplete
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2181-6f358787ded211657532e2ee4df2e446b03d860f/shard-bmg-2/igt@kms_vblank@query-forked-hang@pipe-d-dp-2.html
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-141058v1/shard-bmg-5/igt@kms_vblank@query-forked-hang@pipe-d-dp-2.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_gt_freq@freq_low_max:
>     - shard-lnl:          [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-WARN][5]
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2181-6f358787ded211657532e2ee4df2e446b03d860f/shard-lnl-6/igt@xe_gt_freq@freq_low_max.html
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-141058v1/shard-lnl-5/igt@xe_gt_freq@freq_low_max.html

<4> [431.075162] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: G2H fence 7262, action
3003, done
<4> [432.455310] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: G2H fence 7263, action
3003, done

due to warn added in commit e51527233804 ("drm/xe/guc/ct: Flush g2h
worker in case of g2h response timeout")

@Badal, maybe this should be just xe_gt_dbg() ?