Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Michal Mrozek" <michal.mrozek@intel.com>,
	"Carl Zhang" <carl.zhang@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: disallow bind queue sharing
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:41:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc27ae58-b579-4332-9653-c62b38f32add@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fh6dgogrt3ibrod7qkguejy4bj3cmvlbnxksmedhvfx3ejglk2@nu3h6doh7sdx>

On 20/11/2025 15:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 01:27:29PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> Currently this is very broken if someone attempts to create a bind
>> queue and share it across multiple VMs. For example currently we assume
>> it is safe to acquire the user VM lock to protect some of the bind queue
>> state, but if allow sharing the bind queue with multiple VMs then this
>> quickly breaks down.
>>
>> To fix this reject using a bind queue with any VM that is not the same
>> VM that was originally passed when creating the bind queue. This a uAPI
>> change, however this was more of an oversight on kernel side that we
>> didn't reject this, and expectation is that userspace shouldn't be using
>> bind queues in this way, so in theory this change should go unnoticed.
>>
>> Based on a patch from Matt Brost.
>>
>> v2 (Matt B):
>>  - Hold the vm lock over queue create, to ensure it can't be closed as
>>    we attach the user_vm to the queue.
>>  - Make sure we actually check for NULL user_vm in destruction path.
>> v3:
>>  - Fix error path handling.
>>
>> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
>> Reported-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
>> Cc: Carl Zhang <carl.zhang@intel.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
> 
> we never had any platform officially supported back in 6.8. Let's make
> it 6.12 to avoid useless backporting work.
> 
>> Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> 
> Michal / Carl, can you also ack compute/media are ok with this change?

Ping on this? I did a cursory grep for DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VM_BIND and 
found no users in compute-runtime or media-driver in upstream. This 
change should only be noticeable if you directly use 
DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VM_BIND to create a dedicated bind queue, which you 
then pass into vm_bind.

> 
> Lucas De Marchi


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-24 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-20 13:27 [PATCH v3 0/2] Some bind queue fixes Matthew Auld
2025-11-20 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: disallow bind queue sharing Matthew Auld
2025-11-20 15:06   ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-20 15:47     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-11-20 15:34   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-11-24 13:41     ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2025-12-18 20:40       ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-19  6:36         ` Zhang, Carl
2026-01-19 12:37           ` Matthew Auld
2026-01-19 14:14             ` Mrozek, Michal
2026-01-19 15:09               ` Matthew Auld
2025-11-20 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe/migrate: fix job lock assert Matthew Auld
2025-11-20 15:30   ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-11-20 13:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Some bind queue fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-20 13:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-20 14:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-20 17:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc27ae58-b579-4332-9653-c62b38f32add@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=carl.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox