From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>, <Intel-Xe@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Add support for G2G communications
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:22:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df4db3df-2a2e-49de-905f-a1c51793b8b9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108202216.2020164-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On 11/8/2024 12:22 PM, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> Some features require inter-GuC communication channels on multi-tile
> devices. So allocate and enable such.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 20 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 276 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h | 10 +
> 3 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> index b54fe40fc5a9..fee385532fb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ enum xe_guc_action {
> XE_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT = 0x4503,
> XE_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4505,
> XE_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4506,
> + XE_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_G2G = 0x4507,
> + XE_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_G2G = 0x4508,
> XE_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE = 0x4600,
> XE_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC = 0x4601,
> XE_GUC_ACTION_CLIENT_SOFT_RESET = 0x5507,
> @@ -218,4 +220,22 @@ enum xe_guc_tlb_inval_mode {
> XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_MODE_LITE = 0x1,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * GuC to GuC communication (de-)registration fields:
> + */
> +enum xe_guc_g2g_type {
> + XE_G2G_TYPE_IN = 0x0,
> + XE_G2G_TYPE_OUT,
> + XE_G2G_TYPE_LIMIT,
> +};
> +
> +#define XE_G2G_REGISTER_DEVICE REG_GENMASK(16, 16)
I'd call this DEVICE_ID like in the GuC specs, or GT_ID if you want a
shorter define. Just DEVICE sounds like it's going to a different card
instead of a different GuC device. Not a blocker.
> +#define XE_G2G_REGISTER_TILE REG_GENMASK(15, 12)
> +#define XE_G2G_REGISTER_TYPE REG_GENMASK(11, 8)
> +#define XE_G2G_REGISTER_SIZE REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +
> +#define XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_DEVICE REG_GENMASK(16, 16)
> +#define XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_TILE REG_GENMASK(15, 12)
> +#define XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_TYPE REG_GENMASK(11, 8)
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 1cbad8a91798..899094423291 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,15 @@ static u32 guc_bo_ggtt_addr(struct xe_guc *guc,
> struct xe_bo *bo)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> - u32 addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(bo);
> + u32 addr;
> +
> + /*
> + * For most BOs, the address on the allocating tile is fine. However for
> + * some, e.g. G2G CTB, the address on a specific tile is required as it
> + * might be different for each tile. So, just always ask for the address
> + * on the target GuC.
> + */
> + addr = __xe_bo_ggtt_addr(bo, gt_to_tile(guc_to_gt(guc))->id);
>
> /* GuC addresses above GUC_GGTT_TOP don't map through the GTT */
> xe_assert(xe, addr >= xe_wopcm_size(guc_to_xe(guc)));
> @@ -244,6 +252,263 @@ static void guc_write_params(struct xe_guc *guc)
> xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, SOFT_SCRATCH(1 + i), guc->params[i]);
> }
>
> +static int guc_action_register_g2g_buffer(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 type, u32 dst_tile, u32 dst_dev,
> + u32 desc_addr, u32 buff_addr, u32 size)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + u32 action[] = {
> + XE_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_G2G,
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_REGISTER_SIZE, size / SZ_4K - 1) |
This needs a comment somewhere to explain that the GuC expects the
number of pages minus 1, because otherwise that -1 is confusing.
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_REGISTER_TYPE, type) |
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_REGISTER_TILE, dst_tile) |
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_REGISTER_DEVICE, dst_dev),
> + desc_addr,
> + buff_addr,
> + };
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, (type == XE_G2G_TYPE_IN) || (type == XE_G2G_TYPE_OUT));
> + xe_assert(xe, !(size % SZ_4K));
Is it worth having asserts for max size (1MB) and for dst_dev (0 or 1)?
> +
> + return xe_guc_ct_send_block(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_action_deregister_g2g_buffer(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 type, u32 dst_tile, u32 dst_dev)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + u32 action[] = {
> + XE_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_G2G,
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_TYPE, type) |
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_TILE, dst_tile) |
> + FIELD_PREP(XE_G2G_DEREGISTER_DEVICE, dst_dev),
> + };
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, (type == XE_G2G_TYPE_IN) || (type == XE_G2G_TYPE_OUT));
> +
> + return xe_guc_ct_send_block(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> +}
> +
> +#define G2G_DEV(gt) (((gt)->info.type == XE_GT_TYPE_MAIN) ? 0 : 1)
> +
> +#define G2G_BUFFER_SIZE (SZ_4K)
> +#define G2G_DESC_SIZE (64)
> +#define G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE (SZ_4K)
> +
> +/*
> + * Generate a unique id for each bi-directional CTB for each pair of
> + * near and far tiles/devices. The id can then be used as an index into
> + * a single allocation that is sub-divided into multiple CTBs.
> + *
> + * For example, with two devices per tile and two tiles, the table should
> + * look like:
> + * Far <tile>.<dev>
> + * 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.1
> + * N 0.0 --/-- 00/01 02/03 04/05
> + * e 0.1 01/00 --/-- 06/07 08/09
> + * a 1.0 03/02 07/06 --/-- 10/11
> + * r 1.1 05/04 09/08 11/10 --/--
> + *
> + * Where each entry is Rx/Tx channel id.
> + *
> + * So GuC #3 (tile 1, dev 1) talking to GuC #2 (tile 1, dev 0) would
> + * be reading from channel #11 and writing to channel #10. Whereas,
> + * GuC #2 talking to GuC #3 would be read on #10 and write to #11.
> + */
> +static unsigned int g2g_slot(u32 near_tile, u32 near_dev, u32 far_tile, u32 far_dev,
> + u32 type, u32 max_inst, bool have_dev)
> +{
> + u32 near = near_tile, far = far_tile;
> + u32 idx = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (have_dev) {
> + near = (near << 1) | near_dev;
> + far = (far << 1) | far_dev;
> + }
> +
> + if (far > near) {
> + for (i = near; i > 0; i--)
> + idx += max_inst - i;
The loop can be replaced by a single line with:
idx += near * (2 * max_inst - near - 1) / 2
But the loop is probably easier to understand.
(I've spent way too much time trying to find a better formula with
little luck :P)
> + idx += (far - 1 - near);
> + idx *= 2;
> + idx += type;
> + return idx;
> + }
This needs some comments, because otherwise it's very hard to parse.
Maybe stick with to the table example? something like
/* Count all BO pairs from the rows above the one where the pair we want
is */
for (i = near; i > 0; i--)
idx += max_inst - i;
/* Count all BO pairs on the same row and to the left of the pair we want */
idx += (far - 1 - near);
/* Switch from BO pairs to individual BOs */
idx *= 2;
/* Select which of the 2 BOs in the pair we want */
idx += type;
return idx;
Same thing for the other one, just swap rows with columns and left with
above.
I'm also ok with a different comments as along as there are some.
> +
> + if (far < near) {
> + for (i = far; i > 0; i--)
> + idx += max_inst - i;
> + idx += (near - 1 - far);
> + idx *= 2;
> + idx += (1 - type);
> + return idx;
> + }
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_g2g_register(struct xe_guc *near_guc, struct xe_gt *far_gt, u32 type, bool have_dev)
you don't really need the have_dev passed in from outside, you can just
check for tile->media_gt being not null.
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *near_gt = guc_to_gt(near_guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(near_gt);
> + struct xe_bo *g2g_bo;
> + u32 near_tile = gt_to_tile(near_gt)->id;
> + u32 near_dev = G2G_DEV(near_gt);
> + u32 far_tile = gt_to_tile(far_gt)->id;
> + u32 far_dev = G2G_DEV(far_gt);
> + u32 max = xe->info.gt_count;
> + u32 base, desc, buf;
> + int slot;
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, xe == gt_to_xe(far_gt));
> +
> + g2g_bo = near_guc->g2g.bo;
> + xe_assert(xe, g2g_bo);
> +
> + slot = g2g_slot(near_tile, near_dev, far_tile, far_dev, type, max, have_dev);
> + xe_assert(xe, slot >= 0);
> +
> + base = guc_bo_ggtt_addr(near_guc, g2g_bo);
> + desc = base + slot * G2G_DESC_SIZE;
> + buf = base + slot * G2G_BUFFER_SIZE + G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE;
nit: I'd reorder this to have G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE before the slot, so
it's in order to how the memory is actually filled.
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, (desc - base + G2G_DESC_SIZE) <= G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE);
nit: We should be able to assert this only once at alloc time (see below).
> + xe_assert(xe, (buf - base + G2G_BUFFER_SIZE) <= g2g_bo->size);
> +
> + return guc_action_register_g2g_buffer(near_guc, type, far_tile, far_dev,
> + desc, buf, G2G_BUFFER_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +static void guc_g2g_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 far_tile, u32 far_dev, u32 type)
> +{
> + guc_action_deregister_g2g_buffer(guc, type, far_tile, far_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 guc_g2g_size(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + unsigned int count = xe->info.gt_count;
> + u32 num_channels = (count * (count - 1)) / 2;
> +
> + return num_channels * XE_G2G_TYPE_LIMIT * G2G_BUFFER_SIZE + G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE;
Here we can assert:
num_channels * XE_G2G_TYPE_LIMIT * G2G_DESC_SIZE <= G2G_DESC_AREA_SIZE
to cover all the descriptors in one go
> +}
> +
> +static bool xe_guc_g2g_wanted(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + /* Can't do GuC to GuC communication if there is only one GuC */
> + if (xe->info.gt_count <= 1)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* No current user */
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_g2g_alloc(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> + struct xe_bo *bo;
> + u32 g2g_size;
> +
> + if (guc->g2g.bo)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (gt->info.id != 0) {
> + struct xe_gt *root_gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
> + struct xe_guc *root_guc = &root_gt->uc.guc;
> + struct xe_bo *bo;
> +
> + bo = xe_bo_get(root_guc->g2g.bo);
> + if (IS_ERR(bo))
> + return PTR_ERR(bo);
> +
> + guc->g2g.bo = bo;
> + guc->g2g.owned = false;
It doesn't look like you're actually using the "owned" variable (which
makes sense, because the BO is refcounted so it doesn't matter which GuC
it was originally allocated for)
Daniele
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + g2g_size = guc_g2g_size(guc);
> + bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, g2g_size,
> + XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile) |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_ALL |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_INVALIDATE);
> + if (IS_ERR(bo))
> + return PTR_ERR(bo);
> +
> + xe_map_memset(xe, &bo->vmap, 0, 0, g2g_size);
> + guc->g2g.bo = bo;
> + guc->g2g.owned = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_g2g_start(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *far_gt, *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + unsigned int i, j;
> + int t, err;
> + bool have_dev;
> +
> + if (!guc->g2g.bo) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = guc_g2g_alloc(guc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* GuC interface will need extending if more GT device types are ever created. */
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, (gt->info.type == XE_GT_TYPE_MAIN) || (gt->info.type == XE_GT_TYPE_MEDIA));
> +
> + /* Channel numbering depends on whether there are multiple GTs per tile */
> + have_dev = xe->info.gt_count > xe->info.tile_count;
> +
> + for_each_gt(far_gt, xe, i) {
> + u32 far_tile, far_dev;
> +
> + if (far_gt->info.id == gt->info.id)
> + continue;
> +
> + far_tile = gt_to_tile(far_gt)->id;
> + far_dev = G2G_DEV(far_gt);
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < XE_G2G_TYPE_LIMIT; t++) {
> + err = guc_g2g_register(guc, far_gt, t, have_dev);
> + if (err) {
> + while (--t >= 0)
> + guc_g2g_deregister(guc, far_tile, far_dev, t);
> + goto err_deregister;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_deregister:
> + for_each_gt(far_gt, xe, j) {
> + u32 tile, dev;
> +
> + if (far_gt->info.id == gt->info.id)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (j >= i)
> + break;
> +
> + tile = gt_to_tile(far_gt)->id;
> + dev = G2G_DEV(far_gt);
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < XE_G2G_TYPE_LIMIT; t++)
> + guc_g2g_deregister(guc, tile, dev, t);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static void guc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> {
> struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> @@ -423,7 +688,16 @@ int xe_guc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
>
> int xe_guc_post_load_init(struct xe_guc *guc)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> xe_guc_ads_populate_post_load(&guc->ads);
> +
> + if (xe_guc_g2g_wanted(guc_to_xe(guc))) {
> + ret = guc_g2g_start(guc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> guc->submission_state.enabled = true;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> index fa75f57bf5da..83a41ebcdc91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,15 @@ struct xe_guc {
> struct xe_guc_pc pc;
> /** @dbm: GuC Doorbell Manager */
> struct xe_guc_db_mgr dbm;
> +
> + /** @g2g: GuC to GuC communication state */
> + struct {
> + /** @g2g.bo: Storage for GuC to GuC communication channels */
> + struct xe_bo *bo;
> + /** @g2g.owned: Is the BO owned by this GT or just mapped in */
> + bool owned;
> + } g2g;
> +
> /** @submission_state: GuC submission state */
> struct {
> /** @submission_state.idm: GuC context ID Manager */
> @@ -79,6 +88,7 @@ struct xe_guc {
> /** @submission_state.fini_wq: submit fini wait queue */
> wait_queue_head_t fini_wq;
> } submission_state;
> +
> /** @hwconfig: Hardware config state */
> struct {
> /** @hwconfig.bo: buffer object of the hardware config */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 20:22 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Add support for G2G communication John.C.Harrison
2024-11-08 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Allow bo mapping on multiple ggtts John.C.Harrison
2024-11-15 18:18 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-08 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Add support for G2G communications John.C.Harrison
2024-11-15 19:11 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-15 19:34 ` John Harrison
2024-11-15 19:49 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-15 20:00 ` John Harrison
2024-11-15 20:21 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-15 20:49 ` John Harrison
2024-11-15 21:22 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2024-11-16 2:16 ` John Harrison
2024-11-18 16:34 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-11-19 0:53 ` John Harrison
2024-11-08 21:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add support for G2G communication Patchwork
2024-11-08 21:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-08 21:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-08 22:05 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-08 22:07 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-08 22:08 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-08 22:24 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-10 1:09 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df4db3df-2a2e-49de-905f-a1c51793b8b9@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=Intel-Xe@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox