Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Auld,  Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/7] Try to handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:23:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e968685ecd7bfc330dde20b885f826549e6c6e51.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705160602.237213-9-matthew.auld@intel.com>

On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 17:06 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> In various test cases and workloads that put the system under a heavy load, we
> can sometimes see errors with missed TLB invalidations. If we handle the TLB
> completions directly from IRQ we can see a big improvement.
> 
> v4:
>   - Various tweaks. Big thing is to make sure we grab the fast_lock for the g2h
>     reservation when doing the CT send, which closes one big race with the CT
>     fast-path.
> 

Looks like the __g2h_release_space() warning are now fixed for good now.
But got one 'TLB invalidation fence timeout' while starting Xorg once on a TGL, not able to reproduce again... https://pastebin.com/UFqQ4G7Y





  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-06 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-05 16:06 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/7] Try to handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path Matthew Auld
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/7] drm/xe: hold mem_access.ref for " Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  3:51   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-06  8:29     ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-06 14:50       ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/7] drm/xe/ct: hold fast_lock when reserving space for g2h Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  3:43   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/7] drm/xe/tlb: increment next seqno after successful CT send Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  3:59   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-06  9:42     ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-06 15:15       ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-06 15:22         ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/7] drm/xe/ct: serialise fast_lock during CT disable Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  4:00   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/xe/gt: tweak placement for signalling TLB fences after GT reset Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  4:01   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/7] drm/xe/tlb: also update seqno_recv during reset Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  4:05   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-06 10:02     ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-05 16:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 7/7] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path Matthew Auld
2023-07-06  4:14   ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-05 16:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Try to handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2) Patchwork
2023-07-05 16:11 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-07-05 16:12 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-07-05 16:16 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-07-05 16:16 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-07-05 16:17 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-07-05 17:02 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-07-06 15:23 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2023-07-06 15:48   ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/7] Try to handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e968685ecd7bfc330dde20b885f826549e6c6e51.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox