From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present()
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 12:38:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef0fd9f5eee77510a2498c77d5261e259ae78646@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aDYPImZiZ7hpDWeG@intel.com>
On Tue, 27 May 2025, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 02:46:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Add a proper function for display && HAS_DISPLAY(display) to hide direct
>> struct intel_display access from a number of places outside of display.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 5 +++
>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 1 +
>> .../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 17 +++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_switcheroo.c | 7 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 33 ++++++++-----------
>> 7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> index 1d8c2036d967..765243e3e22d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> @@ -1929,6 +1929,11 @@ void intel_display_device_info_print(const struct intel_display_device_info *inf
>> drm_printf(p, "rawclk rate: %u kHz\n", runtime->rawclk_freq);
>> }
>>
>> +bool intel_display_device_present(struct intel_display *display)
>> +{
>> + return display && HAS_DISPLAY(display);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Assuming the device has display hardware, should it be enabled?
>> *
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> index 0ac5484c0043..f676aa9ecdf8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> @@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ struct intel_display_device_info {
>> } color;
>> };
>>
>> +bool intel_display_device_present(struct intel_display *display);
>> bool intel_display_device_enabled(struct intel_display *display);
>> struct intel_display *intel_display_device_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> void intel_display_device_remove(struct intel_display *display);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
>> index 86d9d2fcb6a6..4fa5caa1ec6d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>>
>> #include "i915_selftest.h"
>>
>> -#include "display/intel_display_core.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_display_device.h"
>> #include "gt/intel_context.h"
>> #include "gt/intel_engine_regs.h"
>> #include "gt/intel_engine_user.h"
>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static bool fastblit_supports_x_tiling(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 55))
>> return false;
>>
>> - return HAS_DISPLAY(i915);
>> + return intel_display_device_present(i915->display);
>> }
>>
>> static bool fast_blit_ok(const struct blit_buffer *buf)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> index 3b0bda74697d..937495eb5690 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> @@ -51,13 +51,14 @@
>> #include "display/intel_bw.h"
>> #include "display/intel_cdclk.h"
>> #include "display/intel_crtc.h"
>> -#include "display/intel_display_core.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_display_device.h"
>> #include "display/intel_display_driver.h"
>> #include "display/intel_dmc.h"
>> #include "display/intel_dp.h"
>> #include "display/intel_dpt.h"
>> #include "display/intel_encoder.h"
>> #include "display/intel_fbdev.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_gmbus.h"
>> #include "display/intel_hotplug.h"
>> #include "display/intel_opregion.h"
>> #include "display/intel_overlay.h"
>> @@ -975,7 +976,7 @@ void i915_driver_shutdown(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> intel_power_domains_disable(display);
>>
>> drm_client_dev_suspend(&i915->drm, false);
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(i915->display)) {
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(&i915->drm);
>> intel_display_driver_disable_user_access(display);
>>
>> @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ void i915_driver_shutdown(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> intel_irq_suspend(i915);
>> intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
>>
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(i915->display))
>> intel_display_driver_suspend_access(display);
>>
>> intel_encoder_suspend_all(display);
>> @@ -1058,7 +1059,7 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>> * properly. */
>> intel_power_domains_disable(display);
>> drm_client_dev_suspend(dev, false);
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(dev_priv->display)) {
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev);
>> intel_display_driver_disable_user_access(display);
>> }
>> @@ -1070,7 +1071,7 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>> intel_irq_suspend(dev_priv);
>> intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
>>
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(dev_priv->display))
>> intel_display_driver_suspend_access(display);
>>
>> intel_encoder_suspend_all(display);
>> @@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>> */
>> intel_irq_resume(dev_priv);
>>
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(dev_priv->display))
>> drm_mode_config_reset(dev);
>>
>> i915_gem_resume(dev_priv);
>> @@ -1226,14 +1227,14 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>> intel_clock_gating_init(dev_priv);
>>
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(dev_priv->display))
>> intel_display_driver_resume_access(display);
>>
>> intel_hpd_init(display);
>>
>> intel_display_driver_resume(display);
>>
>> - if (HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(dev_priv->display)) {
>> intel_display_driver_enable_user_access(display);
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(dev);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_switcheroo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_switcheroo.c
>> index 4c02a04be681..431a8559e489 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_switcheroo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_switcheroo.c
>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
>>
>> -#include "display/intel_display_core.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_display_device.h"
>>
>> #include "i915_driver.h"
>> #include "i915_drv.h"
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static void i915_switcheroo_set_state(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DRM not initialized, aborting switch.\n");
>> return;
>> }
>> - if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) {
>> + if (!intel_display_device_present(i915->display)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device state not initialized, aborting switch.\n");
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ static bool i915_switcheroo_can_switch(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> * locking inversion with the driver load path. And the access here is
>> * completely racy anyway. So don't bother with locking for now.
>> */
>> - return i915 && HAS_DISPLAY(i915) && atomic_read(&i915->drm.open_count) == 0;
>> + return i915 && intel_display_device_present(i915->display) &&
>> + atomic_read(&i915->drm.open_count) == 0;
>> }
>>
>> static const struct vga_switcheroo_client_ops i915_switcheroo_ops = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> index 9f806ce0eb9e..ecfa5347ffd6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> @@ -716,7 +716,8 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> detect_fsb_freq(i915);
>> detect_mem_freq(i915);
>>
>> - if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 9 || IS_DG2(i915) || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
>> + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 9 || IS_DG2(i915) ||
>> + !intel_display_device_present(i915->display))
>> return;
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> index 3f92bf51813e..142e2065fce8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>> #include "intel_audio.h"
>> #include "intel_bw.h"
>> #include "intel_display.h"
>> -#include "intel_display_core.h"
>> +#include "intel_display_device.h"
>> #include "intel_display_driver.h"
>> #include "intel_display_irq.h"
>> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>> @@ -37,13 +37,6 @@
>>
>> /* Xe device functions */
>>
>> -static bool has_display(struct xe_device *xe)
>> -{
>> - struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
>> -
>> - return HAS_DISPLAY(display);
>> -}
>> -
>> /**
>> * xe_display_driver_probe_defer - Detect if we need to wait for other drivers
>> * early on
>> @@ -287,7 +280,7 @@ static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> intel_dmc_suspend(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> intel_hpd_poll_enable(display);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -300,14 +293,14 @@ static void xe_display_disable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> intel_dmc_resume(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> drm_mode_config_reset(&xe->drm);
>>
>> intel_display_driver_init_hw(display);
>>
>> intel_hpd_init(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> intel_hpd_poll_disable(display);
>>
>> intel_opregion_resume(display);
>> @@ -330,7 +323,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>> intel_power_domains_disable(display);
>> drm_client_dev_suspend(&xe->drm, false);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display)) {
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(&xe->drm);
>> intel_display_driver_disable_user_access(display);
>> intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
>> @@ -340,7 +333,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display)) {
>> intel_display_driver_suspend_access(display);
>> intel_encoder_suspend_all(display);
>> }
>> @@ -360,7 +353,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
>> intel_power_domains_disable(display);
>> drm_client_dev_suspend(&xe->drm, false);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display)) {
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(&xe->drm);
>> intel_display_driver_disable_user_access(display);
>> intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
>> @@ -370,7 +363,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
>> intel_dp_mst_suspend(display);
>> intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> intel_display_driver_suspend_access(display);
>>
>> intel_encoder_suspend_all(display);
>> @@ -459,23 +452,23 @@ void xe_display_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> intel_dmc_resume(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> drm_mode_config_reset(&xe->drm);
>
> It doesn't matter how we call it, has_display, display_device_present,
> I still have a concern:
>
> why would we runt intel_display_driver_init_hw like below if we don't
> have display or if display_device is not present?
> Where is the line traced between what to call and what to not call?
>
> Any way to move decisions upper level or more generalized?
I think both xe and i915 should call a fairly small set of display
functions, and all of these conditions should be hidden there.
I think the special case is, we find display hardware, but the pipes are
fused off. We can only figure that out after we've already set up a
bunch off stuff, so we should also clean up afterwards.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Anyway, the helper function itself is better than the double usage
> that we currently have, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
>>
>> intel_display_driver_init_hw(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> intel_display_driver_resume_access(display);
>>
>> intel_hpd_init(display);
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe)) {
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display)) {
>> intel_display_driver_resume(display);
>> drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(&xe->drm);
>> intel_display_driver_enable_user_access(display);
>> }
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> intel_hpd_poll_disable(display);
>>
>> intel_opregion_resume(display);
>> @@ -540,7 +533,7 @@ int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> xe->display = display;
>>
>> - if (has_display(xe))
>> + if (intel_display_device_present(display))
>> return 0;
>>
>> no_display:
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 11:46 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present() Jani Nikula
2025-05-27 19:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-05-30 9:38 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-27 20:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-05-27 20:05 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-27 20:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-27 20:16 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-27 20:19 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-27 20:20 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 0:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-28 5:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present() (rev2) Patchwork
2025-05-28 5:11 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 5:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 5:16 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-28 7:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present() Patchwork
2025-05-28 7:06 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 7:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 7:11 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-28 8:13 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present() (rev2) Patchwork
2025-05-28 8:13 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 8:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 8:18 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-03 9:04 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: add intel_display_device_present() Jani Nikula
2025-09-05 11:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-09 8:22 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef0fd9f5eee77510a2498c77d5261e259ae78646@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox