From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Drop RCU list handling for VRAM bad-page tracking, use mgr->lock
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:56:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb9de556-4428-497b-afcf-3e3c5a4a65ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001094518.1493651-9-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
On 01-10-2026 15:15, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> queued_pages and offlined_pages were mutated with list_add_rcu()/
> list_del_rcu()/kfree_rcu(), but the only lockless consumer was the
> vram_bad_pages debugfs show function. Every other reader and writer
> already runs under mgr->lock, so the RCU protection bought nothing
> but complexity and a rcu_head field on every tracked entry.
>
> Convert all list operations to plain list_add()/list_del()/kfree(),
> including the retry helper added by the ghost-ownership fix, and
> have vram_bad_pages_show() take mgr->lock instead of rcu_read_lock()
> so list traversal is always serialized against mutation.
>
> Fixes: 7737f819e9f1 ("drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler")
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c | 26 +++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr_types.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> index ed79e4c6ba1a..7211ab5f66e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> @@ -243,9 +243,9 @@ static void xe_ttm_vram_retry_queued_pages(struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr)
> continue;
> }
> --mgr->n_queued_pages;
> - list_del_rcu(&pos->queued_link);
> + list_del(&pos->queued_link);
> ++mgr->n_offlined_pages;
> - list_add_rcu(&pos->offlined_link, &mgr->offlined_pages);
> + list_add(&pos->offlined_link, &mgr->offlined_pages);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -394,17 +394,17 @@ static void xe_ttm_vram_free_bad_pages(struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr)
> struct xe_ttm_vram_offline_resource *pos, *n;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, &mgr->offlined_pages, offlined_link) {
> - list_del_rcu(&pos->offlined_link);
> + list_del(&pos->offlined_link);
> xe_ttm_vram_buddy_free(mgr, &pos->blocks, pos->used_visible_size);
> --mgr->n_offlined_pages;
> - kfree_rcu(pos, rcu);
> + kfree(pos);
> }
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, &mgr->queued_pages, queued_link) {
> - list_del_rcu(&pos->queued_link);
> + list_del(&pos->queued_link);
> /* queued entries have no buddy reservation yet */
> xe_ttm_vram_buddy_free(mgr, &pos->blocks, 0);
> --mgr->n_queued_pages;
> - kfree_rcu(pos, rcu);
> + kfree(pos);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_reserve_page_at_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 addr,
> }
> /* Queue free(to-be-purged) pages */
> ++vram_mgr->n_queued_pages;
> - list_add_rcu(&nentry->queued_link, &vram_mgr->queued_pages);
> + list_add(&nentry->queued_link, &vram_mgr->queued_pages);
> } else {
> /* Immediately offline unoccupied pages */
> /* Queue free(to-be-reserved) pages */
> @@ -837,11 +837,11 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_reserve_page_at_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 addr,
> "Page at addr:0x%llx still busy (%d), deferring reservation\n",
> addr, ret);
> ++vram_mgr->n_queued_pages;
> - list_add_rcu(&nentry->queued_link, &vram_mgr->queued_pages);
> + list_add(&nentry->queued_link, &vram_mgr->queued_pages);
> return 0;
> }
> ++vram_mgr->n_offlined_pages;
> - list_add_rcu(&nentry->offlined_link, &vram_mgr->offlined_pages);
> + list_add(&nentry->offlined_link, &vram_mgr->offlined_pages);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -1045,16 +1045,16 @@ static int vram_bad_pages_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> continue;
> mgr = to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr(man);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &mgr->offlined_pages, offlined_link) {
> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &mgr->offlined_pages, offlined_link) {
> u64 pfn;
>
> pfn = (pos->addr + vr->dpa_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> seq_printf(m, "0x%016llx : 0x%016lx : R\n", pfn, PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &mgr->queued_pages, queued_link) {
> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &mgr->queued_pages, queued_link) {
> u64 pfn;
>
> pfn = (pos->addr + vr->dpa_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static int vram_bad_pages_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> pfn, PAGE_SIZE, pos->status ? 'F' : 'P');
> }
>
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr_types.h
> index 95a427e3b0a7..ef7e4c87a7bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr_types.h
> @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ struct xe_ttm_vram_offline_resource {
> u64 addr;
> /** @status: buddy reservation status */
> enum xe_page_reserve_status status;
> - /** @rcu: RCU head for deferred freeing */
> - struct rcu_head rcu;
Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> };
>
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 9:45 [PATCH 0/4] Followup fixes for memory page offline Tejas Upadhyay
2026-10-01 9:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Clean up kernel-doc typos in VRAM manager Tejas Upadhyay
2026-10-01 10:25 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-10-01 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Re-validate external pin under resv lock before VRAM purge Tejas Upadhyay
2026-10-05 6:58 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-10-01 9:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Drop RCU list handling for VRAM bad-page tracking, use mgr->lock Tejas Upadhyay
2026-10-01 10:26 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2026-10-01 9:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Keep VRAM fault injection within the usable range Tejas Upadhyay
2026-10-01 10:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-05 6:13 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-10-01 10:27 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-10-01 9:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Followup fixes for memory page offline Patchwork
2026-10-01 13:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-01 17:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb9de556-4428-497b-afcf-3e3c5a4a65ec@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox