From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Add support for w/a KLVs
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:15:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdd66cb9-eea1-4e70-9498-ad1b48c94717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4637cc6-307f-42d3-859c-15b9c304b44f@intel.com>
On 3/20/2024 1:40 PM, John Harrison wrote:
> On 3/19/2024 09:08, Badal Nilawar wrote:
>> To prevent running out of bits, new w/a enable flags are being added
>> via a KLV system instead of a 32 bit flags word.
>>
>> v2: GuC version check > 70.10 is not needed as xe will not be supporting
>> anything below < 70.19 (John Harrison)
>>
>> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_fwif.h | 5 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> index 6ad4c1a90a78..506f0be35763 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ ads_to_map(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> * +---------------------------------------+
>> * | padding |
>> * +---------------------------------------+ <== 4K aligned
>> + * | w/a KLVs |
>> + * +---------------------------------------+
>> + * | padding |
>> + * +---------------------------------------+ <== 4K aligned
>> * | capture lists |
>> * +---------------------------------------+
>> * | padding |
>> @@ -131,6 +135,11 @@ static size_t guc_ads_golden_lrc_size(struct
>> xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> return PAGE_ALIGN(ads->golden_lrc_size);
>> }
>> +static u32 guc_ads_waklv_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> +{
>> + return PAGE_ALIGN(ads->ads_waklv_size);
>> +}
>> +
>> static size_t guc_ads_capture_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> {
>> /* FIXME: Allocate a proper capture list */
>> @@ -167,12 +176,22 @@ static size_t guc_ads_golden_lrc_offset(struct
>> xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
>> }
>> +static size_t guc_ads_waklv_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> +{
>> + u32 offset;
>> +
>> + offset = guc_ads_golden_lrc_offset(ads) +
>> + guc_ads_golden_lrc_size(ads);
>> +
>> + return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> static size_t guc_ads_capture_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> {
>> size_t offset;
>> - offset = guc_ads_golden_lrc_offset(ads) +
>> - guc_ads_golden_lrc_size(ads);
>> + offset = guc_ads_waklv_offset(ads) +
>> + guc_ads_waklv_size(ads);
>> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
>> }
>> @@ -260,6 +279,41 @@ static size_t calculate_golden_lrc_size(struct
>> xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> return total_size;
>> }
>> +static void guc_waklv_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> +{
>> + u32 addr_ggtt, offset, remain, size;
>> +
>> + offset = guc_ads_waklv_offset(ads);
>> + remain = guc_ads_waklv_size(ads);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Add workarounds here:
>> + *
>> + * if (want_wa_<name>) {
>> + * size = guc_waklv_<name>(guc, offset, remain);
>> + * offset += size;
>> + * remain -= size;
>> + * }
>> + */
>> +
>> + size = guc_ads_waklv_size(ads) - remain;
>> + if (!size)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + offset = guc_ads_waklv_offset(ads);
>> + addr_ggtt = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ads->bo) + offset;
>> +
>> + ads_blob_write(ads, ads.wa_klv_addr_lo, addr_ggtt);
>> + ads_blob_write(ads, ads.wa_klv_addr_hi, 0);
> @Daniele is pushing a change for supporting 64bit addresses (for
> future compatibility) - https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131282/
>
> Is there any value to changing this address to 64bit as well and
> changing the hard 0 to upper_32(addr) instead?
For consistency it'd be nice to do so, but I'm ok with just hard-coding
a zero in the upper bits if the variable is a u32; the compiler should
warn us if we ever switch xe_bo_ggtt_addr to return u64 so we can change
it up at that point if needed. The things I want to avoid are either
using upper_32_bits() on a u32 or hard-coding a 0 in the upper bits if
the variable is a u64, and this patch does none of those things.
Daniele
>
> John.
>
>
>> + ads_blob_write(ads, ads.wa_klv_size, size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int calculate_waklv_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> +{
>> + /* Fudge something chunky for now: */
>> + return PAGE_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define MAX_GOLDEN_LRC_SIZE (SZ_4K * 64)
>> int xe_guc_ads_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> @@ -271,6 +325,7 @@ int xe_guc_ads_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> ads->golden_lrc_size = calculate_golden_lrc_size(ads);
>> ads->regset_size = calculate_regset_size(gt);
>> + ads->ads_waklv_size = calculate_waklv_size(ads);
>> bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, guc_ads_size(ads)
>> + MAX_GOLDEN_LRC_SIZE,
>> XE_BO_CREATE_SYSTEM_BIT |
>> @@ -597,6 +652,8 @@ void xe_guc_ads_populate(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> guc_mapping_table_init(gt, &info_map);
>> guc_capture_list_init(ads);
>> guc_doorbell_init(ads);
>> + /* Workaround KLV list */
>> + guc_waklv_init(ads);
>> if (xe->info.has_usm) {
>> guc_um_init_params(ads);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
>> index 4afe44bece4b..62235b2a6fe3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ struct xe_guc_ads {
>> size_t golden_lrc_size;
>> /** @regset_size: size of register set passed to GuC for
>> save/restore */
>> u32 regset_size;
>> + /** @ads_waklv_size: waklv size */
>> + u32 ads_waklv_size;
>> };
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_fwif.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_fwif.h
>> index c281fdbfd2d6..52503719d2aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_fwif.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_fwif.h
>> @@ -207,7 +207,10 @@ struct guc_ads {
>> u32
>> capture_instance[GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_INDEX_MAX][GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES];
>> u32
>> capture_class[GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_INDEX_MAX][GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES];
>> u32 capture_global[GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_INDEX_MAX];
>> - u32 reserved[14];
>> + u32 wa_klv_addr_lo;
>> + u32 wa_klv_addr_hi;
>> + u32 wa_klv_size;
>> + u32 reserved[11];
>> } __packed;
>> /* Engine usage stats */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 16:08 [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Wa KLVs Badal Nilawar
2024-03-19 15:59 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add support for Wa KLVs (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-19 15:59 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 16:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Add support for w/a KLVs Badal Nilawar
2024-03-20 20:40 ` John Harrison
2024-03-22 17:15 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2024-03-25 14:35 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-03-19 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/lnl: Enable GuC Wa_14019882105 Badal Nilawar
2024-03-20 20:43 ` John Harrison
2024-03-19 16:11 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Add support for Wa KLVs (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-19 16:16 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 16:18 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 16:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdd66cb9-eea1-4e70-9498-ad1b48c94717@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox