Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:13:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170854@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014055215.330408-5-raag.jadav@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: MMIO access on suspended device during async wedge
--

commit bce18d1215504bf5f21999a5ea9ee776aca1fe38
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>

drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe

This commit defers wedge handling to a dedicated worker, allowing
xe_device_declare_wedged() to be safely called from IRQ contexts such as
handling MERT CAT errors.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1405,29 +1421,28 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe, unsigned long method)
>  
>  	if (!atomic_xchg(&xe->wedged.flag, 1)) {
>  		xe->needs_flr_on_fini = true;
> -		xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> +		pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe->drm.dev);

[Severity: High]
Does this allow MMIO access on a suspended device when a wedge is triggered
from an IRQ context?

If a hardware error (like a MERT CAT error) triggers an IRQ while the
device is in the RPM_SUSPENDED state, pm_runtime_get_noresume() will
increment the usage counter but will not wake the device up.

The GT wedge worker is then scheduled:

>  		xe_log_err_fatal(xe, WEDGED, -EIO, "Device declared wedged!\n");
>  		xe_err_once(xe, "IOCTLs and executions are now blocked!\n"
>  			    "For recovery procedure, refer to %s\n"
>  			    "Please file a _new_ bug report at %s\n",
>  			    WEDGED_URL, XE_BUG_URL);
> -	}
>  
> -	for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
> -		xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
> +		for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
> +			xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);

And runs asynchronously without ensuring the device is resumed:

gt_wedge_worker()
  xe_uc_declare_wedged()
    xe_guc_declare_wedged()
      xe_guc_submit_wedge()
        xe_guc_softreset()
          xe_guc_mmio_send()

Since the device might still be suspended, this sequence can result in
xe_guc_mmio_send() performing MMIO accesses on powered-down hardware,
causing invalid register reads (e.g., returning 0xffffffff), hardware
timeouts, or PCIe bus errors.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014055215.330408-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  5:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  6:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 18:03     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  6:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 18:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  6:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14  5:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-14  6:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14  5:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-14  6:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-14 11:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170854@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox