From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:13:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170854@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014055215.330408-5-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: MMIO access on suspended device during async wedge
--
commit bce18d1215504bf5f21999a5ea9ee776aca1fe38
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe
This commit defers wedge handling to a dedicated worker, allowing
xe_device_declare_wedged() to be safely called from IRQ contexts such as
handling MERT CAT errors.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1405,29 +1421,28 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe, unsigned long method)
>
> if (!atomic_xchg(&xe->wedged.flag, 1)) {
> xe->needs_flr_on_fini = true;
> - xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe->drm.dev);
[Severity: High]
Does this allow MMIO access on a suspended device when a wedge is triggered
from an IRQ context?
If a hardware error (like a MERT CAT error) triggers an IRQ while the
device is in the RPM_SUSPENDED state, pm_runtime_get_noresume() will
increment the usage counter but will not wake the device up.
The GT wedge worker is then scheduled:
> xe_log_err_fatal(xe, WEDGED, -EIO, "Device declared wedged!\n");
> xe_err_once(xe, "IOCTLs and executions are now blocked!\n"
> "For recovery procedure, refer to %s\n"
> "Please file a _new_ bug report at %s\n",
> WEDGED_URL, XE_BUG_URL);
> - }
>
> - for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
> - xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
> + for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
> + xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
And runs asynchronously without ensuring the device is resumed:
gt_wedge_worker()
xe_uc_declare_wedged()
xe_guc_declare_wedged()
xe_guc_submit_wedge()
xe_guc_softreset()
xe_guc_mmio_send()
Since the device might still be suspended, this sequence can result in
xe_guc_mmio_send() performing MMIO accesses on powered-down hardware,
causing invalid register reads (e.g., returning 0xffffffff), hardware
timeouts, or PCIe bus errors.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014055215.330408-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 5:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 18:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 18:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 18:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 18:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 5:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-14 6:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-14 11:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170854@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox