From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:14:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170856@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014055215.330408-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: Infinite TDR loop when device wedged during GT init
--
commit 6009cd9a52688d1928f2b5ef571d3108edd7243e
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
This commit introduces a worker for GT specific wedge handling and queues the
teardown on the GT ordered workqueue. This prevents scheduler disruptions
while jobs are still in-flight. It also introduces the
for_each_initialized_gt() macro and uses it when declaring the device
wedged.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index e1979bbcf7bc6..014bc5b0216dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe)
> WEDGED_URL, XE_BUG_URL);
> }
>
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> + for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
[Severity: High]
Does this create a race condition if the device is wedged concurrently with
xe_gt_init()?
If xe_device_declare_wedged() runs while a GT is initializing, the GT is
skipped here because gt->initialized is false.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 775c826b68b42..d8bf538ceafff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -769,6 +773,8 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return err;
> }
>
> + /* Must be last */
> + WRITE_ONCE(gt->initialized, true);
> return 0;
> }
Then xe_gt_init() sets gt->initialized to true without checking if a global
wedge event occurred during initialization.
This allows the GT to become active even though its GuC was never wedged
(since xe_guc_submit_wedge() was skipped during xe_device_declare_wedged()).
If jobs submitted to this GT (like migration jobs) hang, the TDR in
guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() runs. Since the TDR detects the global wedge
via xe_wedged(), it skips the hardware reset but returns NO_HANG while
immediately re-queueing the TDR work:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() {
...
xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
if (wedge_device)
xe_device_declare_wedged(gt_to_xe(q->gt));
/*
* We want the job added back to the pending list so it gets freed; this
* is what DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG does.
*/
return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG;
}
Can this lead to an infinite TDR spinloop (100% CPU deadlock) since the job
is never completed nor is the hardware reset?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014055215.330408-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 5:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 18:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 18:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 18:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 18:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 5:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-14 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 5:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-14 6:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-14 11:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170856@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox