From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173958@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016072623.457392-7-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: flush_work() in PCI error recovery triggers MMIO on suspended device
--
commit a372afc80ddd4997ba73485e586ca48280dbd14b
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset
This commit flushes the GT wedge worker synchronously to avoid side
effects during PCI bus reset.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> index e1b9dc5f0a6dc..a5c8fd67738cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ static void prepare_device_for_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> xe_device_set_in_reset(xe);
>
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
> + flush_work(>->wedge.worker);
[Severity: High]
Does flushing the wedge worker here trigger unauthorized MMIO accesses on
a suspended device?
If the device is runtime suspended (D3hot), prepare_device_for_reset()
takes a PM reference earlier in the function via xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume()
which does not wake up the device.
By synchronously flushing the wedge worker here, it executes in this suspended
context. The worker unconditionally calls xe_device_assert_mem_access() (which
fails because the device is suspended) and proceeds to perform MMIO accesses
such as xe_guc_softreset().
Accessing MMIO on a D3hot device can cause PCI master aborts, NMI system
crashes, or hardware hangs.
> + }
>
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016072623.457392-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 7:25 [PATCH v10 0/9] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] drm/xe/hw_error: Guard csc_hw_error_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] drm/xe/amc: Guard xe_amc_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 8:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev9) Patchwork
2026-10-16 8:06 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173958@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox