From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:50:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173970@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016072623.457392-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: gt_wedge_worker assertion fails if device is suspended
--
commit ad400bddb33c2efaf9ed050aad03a83745b08aa2
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
This commit introduces a GT wedge worker to handle execution queue
teardown asynchronously, avoiding scheduler disruption while jobs are
in-flight. It also adds a for_each_initialized_gt() macro to prevent
races if the device is wedged during the probe sequence.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index bc9bf6f0b5a79..27f32627a1f9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1204,6 +1209,15 @@ struct xe_hw_engine *xe_gt_any_hw_engine(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = container_of(w, typeof(*gt), wedge.worker);
> +
> + xe_device_assert_mem_access(gt_to_xe(gt));
[Severity: High]
Does this assertion fail if the device is suspended?
If a hardware fault or PCIe AER injection triggers wedging while the
device is in a runtime-suspended state (like D3hot), the error handler
calls xe_device_declare_wedged() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c.
That function uses xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume():
if (!atomic_xchg(&xe->wedged.flag, 1)) {
xe->needs_flr_on_fini = true;
xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
This increments the PM usage count but leaves the device suspended.
When this asynchronous gt_wedge_worker executes, it unconditionally hits
xe_device_assert_mem_access(). Since the device is still
runtime-suspended, this assertion will fail, potentially causing a kernel
warning that disrupts the recovery process.
> + xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> + xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> +}
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016072623.457392-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 7:25 [PATCH v10 0/9] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] drm/xe/hw_error: Guard csc_hw_error_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] drm/xe/amc: Guard xe_amc_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-16 7:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 8:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev9) Patchwork
2026-10-16 8:06 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173970@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox