Re: (subset) [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring uapi updates

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 11/16/22 7:22 AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 16.11.22 um 14:50 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>> On 11/15/22 11:34 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
>>> On 11/16/22 6:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 04:29:51 +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
>>>>> From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>>
>>>>> io_uring uapi updates:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Don't force linux/time_types.h for userspace. Linux's io_uring.h is
>>>>> ???? synced 1:1 into liburing's io_uring.h. liburing has a configure
>>>>> ???? check to detect the need for linux/time_types.h (Stefan).
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [1/2] io_uring: uapi: Don't force linux/time_types.h for userspace
>>>> ??????? commit: 958bfdd734b6074ba88ee3abc69d0053e26b7b9c
>>>
>>> Jens, please drop this commit. It breaks the build:
>>
>> Dropped - please actually build your patches, or make it clear that
>> they were not built at all. None of these 2 patches were any good.
> 
> Is it tools/testing/selftests/net/io_uring_zerocopy_tx.c that doesn't build?

Honestly not sure, but saw a few reports come in. Here's the one from
linux-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221116123556.79a7bbd8@canb.auug.org.au/

> and needs a '#define HAVE_LINUX_TIME_TYPES_H 1'
> 
> BTW, the original commit I posted was here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/c7782923deeb4016f2ac2334bc558921e8d91a67.1666605446.git.metze@samba.org/
> 
> What's the magic to compile tools/testing/selftests/net/io_uring_zerocopy_tx.c ?

Some variant of make kselftests-foo?

> My naive tries both fail (even without my patch):

Mine does too, in various other tests. Stephen?

-- 
Jens Axboe