From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/15] auto-t: fix testSAE autoconnect_test.py
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:40:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200828164050.1456-11-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200828164050.1456-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]
This test was unreliable since it was assuming a periodic scan would
happen at just the right time. Instead since we are expecting autoconnect
we can just wait for DeviceState.connected then after we are connected
verify the network was correct.
---
autotests/testSAE/autoconnect_test.py | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/autotests/testSAE/autoconnect_test.py b/autotests/testSAE/autoconnect_test.py
index a45fd09d..2eb73b7f 100644
--- a/autotests/testSAE/autoconnect_test.py
+++ b/autotests/testSAE/autoconnect_test.py
@@ -23,20 +23,15 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
devices[2].disconnect()
devices[3].disconnect()
- condition = 'obj.scanning'
- wd.wait_for_object_condition(device, condition)
+ condition = 'obj.state == DeviceState.connected'
+ wd.wait_for_object_condition(device, condition, 30)
- condition = 'not obj.scanning'
+ condition = 'obj.connected_network is not None'
wd.wait_for_object_condition(device, condition)
ordered_network = device.get_ordered_network('ssidSAE')
- self.assertEqual(ordered_network.type, NetworkType.psk)
-
- condition = 'obj.connected'
- wd.wait_for_object_condition(ordered_network.network_object, condition)
-
- device.wait_for_connected()
+ self.assertTrue(ordered_network.network_object.connected)
device.disconnect()
@@ -44,7 +39,7 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
wd.wait_for_object_condition(ordered_network.network_object, condition)
def test_connection_success(self):
- wd = IWD(True)
+ wd = IWD()
self.validate_connection(wd)
--
2.21.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-28 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-28 16:40 [PATCH v2 00/15] Test Runner rewrite James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] auto-t: prepare autotests for test-runner re-write James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] auto-t: introduce pure python " James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] auto-t: hostapd.py: update to work with test-runner rewrite James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] auto-t: testutil.py: " James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] auto-t: ofono.py: fix timeout cleanup and wait for service James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] auto-t: iwd.py: update to work with test-runner rewrite James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] auto-t: iwd.py: fix multiple timeout cleanup issues James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] auto-t: remove wiphy.py James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] auto-t: fix hidden network test James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] auto-t: skip ofono tests if ofonod isn't running James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] auto-t: replace hard-coded interfaces James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] auto-t: remove device.wait_for_connected James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] tools: post test-runner rewrite cleanup James Prestwood
2020-08-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] doc: update test runner docs James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200828164050.1456-11-prestwoj@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox