From: kpark3469@gmail.com
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
panand@redhat.com, keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:14:09 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486296850-16045-2-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486296850-16045-1-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com>
From: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
This implements arch_within_stack_frames() for arm64 that should
validate if a given object is contained by a kernel stack frame.
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 1117421..8bf70b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config ARM64
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
select HAVE_KPROBES
select HAVE_KRETPROBES if HAVE_KPROBES
+ select HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES
select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
select IRQ_DOMAIN
select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 46c3b93..70baad3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -68,7 +68,71 @@ struct thread_info {
#define thread_saved_fp(tsk) \
((unsigned long)(tsk->thread.cpu_context.fp))
+#define get_stack_start(fp) (fp + 2 * sizeof(void *))
+
+/*
+ * Walks up the stack frames to make sure that the specified object is
+ * entirely contained by a single stack frame.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * GOOD_FRAME if within a frame
+ * BAD_STACK if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack)
+ * NOT_STACK unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc)
+ */
+
+static inline enum stack_type arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
+ const void * const stackend,
+ const void *obj, unsigned long len)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+ const void *callee_fp = NULL;
+ const void *caller_fp = NULL;
+
+ callee_fp = __builtin_frame_address(1);
+ if (callee_fp)
+ caller_fp = *(const void * const *)callee_fp;
+ /*
+ * Case #1:
+ * low ----------------------------------------------> high
+ * [callee_fp][lr][args][local vars][caller_fp'][lr']
+ * ^----------------^
+ * allow copies only within here
+ *
+ * Case #2:
+ * low ----------------------------------------------> high
+ * [check_object_size_fp][lr][args][local vars][callee_fp][lr]
+ * ^----------------^
+ * dynamically allocated stack variable of
+ * callee frame copies are allowed within here
+ *
+ * < example code snippet for Case#2 >
+ * array_size = get_random_int() & 0x0f;
+ * if (to_user) {
+ * unsigned char array[array_size];
+ * if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, array,
+ * unconst + sizeof(array))) {
+ */
+ while (stack <= callee_fp && callee_fp < stackend &&
+ !((unsigned long)caller_fp & 0xf)) {
+ /*
+ * If obj + len extends past the caller frame, this
+ * check won't pass and the next frame will be 0,
+ * causing us to bail out and correctly report
+ * the copy as invalid.
+ */
+ if (!caller_fp || (obj + len <= caller_fp))
+ return (obj >= get_stack_start(callee_fp)) ?
+ GOOD_FRAME : BAD_STACK;
+ callee_fp = caller_fp;
+ caller_fp = *(const void * const *)caller_fp;
+ }
+ return BAD_STACK;
+#else
+ return NOT_STACK;
#endif
+}
+
+#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
/*
* thread information flags:
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-05 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-05 12:14 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type kpark3469
2017-02-05 12:14 ` kpark3469 [this message]
2017-02-05 12:14 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 3/3] lkdtm: add tests for dynamic array in local stack kpark3469
2017-02-06 22:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-06 22:34 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation Kees Cook
2017-02-07 10:19 ` James Morse
2017-02-07 17:03 ` James Morse
2017-02-07 18:13 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-08 11:16 ` James Morse
2017-02-08 21:38 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-16 17:38 ` James Morse
2017-02-06 22:23 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486296850-16045-2-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com \
--to=kpark3469@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox