From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:22:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com> (raw)
Vasiliy,
At least on rhel5/openvz kernels, 32-bit processes get their shared libs
loaded at different kinds of addresses on i686 vs. x86_64 kernels.
Here's an example:
32-bit kernel and userland (OpenVZ container):
$ ldd /bin/ls
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00a99000)
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x00c1a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0014d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00617000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0012e000)
64-bit kernel, 32-bit userland (OpenVZ container):
$ ldd /bin/ls
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xb7fcf000)
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0xb7fca000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7eae000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e5b000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fe6000)
Notice how the 32-bit kernel produces addresses that are safer against
attacks via C strings (contain NULs). This is the approach I used in
-ow patches (using 0x00110000 as the base address, considering vm86
needs for the first 1 MB + 64 KB). I'd like 64-bit kernels to do the
same when running 32-bit binaries.
Can you please look into this and likely fix it for mainline, as well as
for rhel6/openvz when we're ready to move to those kernels? A fix for
rhel5/openvz would also be welcome if it's easy to do.
Thanks,
Alexander
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-23 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-23 16:22 Solar Designer [this message]
2011-07-24 8:51 ` [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 14:27 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-11 8:32 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 3:57 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 4:21 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 8:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 9:20 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 9:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 10:04 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 10:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 9:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox