public inbox for kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:22:51 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com> (raw)

Vasiliy,

At least on rhel5/openvz kernels, 32-bit processes get their shared libs
loaded at different kinds of addresses on i686 vs. x86_64 kernels.

Here's an example:

32-bit kernel and userland (OpenVZ container):

$ ldd /bin/ls
        librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00a99000)
        libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x00c1a000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0014d000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00617000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0012e000)

64-bit kernel, 32-bit userland (OpenVZ container):

$ ldd /bin/ls
        librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xb7fcf000)
        libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0xb7fca000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7eae000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e5b000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fe6000)

Notice how the 32-bit kernel produces addresses that are safer against
attacks via C strings (contain NULs).  This is the approach I used in
-ow patches (using 0x00110000 as the base address, considering vm86
needs for the first 1 MB + 64 KB).  I'd like 64-bit kernels to do the
same when running 32-bit binaries.

Can you please look into this and likely fix it for mainline, as well as
for rhel6/openvz when we're ready to move to those kernels?  A fix for
rhel5/openvz would also be welcome if it's easy to do.

Thanks,

Alexander

             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-23 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-23 16:22 Solar Designer [this message]
2011-07-24  8:51 ` [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 14:27   ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:18     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:20     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-11  8:32       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12  3:57         ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12  4:21           ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12  8:20             ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12  9:20               ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12  9:52                 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 10:04                   ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 10:06                     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29  9:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:43   ` Vasiliy Kulikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com \
    --to=solar@openwall.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox