From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:27:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729092712.GA7727@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com>
Solar,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 20:22 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> At least on rhel5/openvz kernels, 32-bit processes get their shared libs
> loaded at different kinds of addresses on i686 vs. x86_64 kernels.
Looking into RHEL6 kernel:
void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
...
if (!(current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC)
&& mmap_is_ia32())
mm->get_unmapped_exec_area = arch_get_unmapped_exec_area;
...
}
#define SHLIB_BASE 0x00110000
unsigned long
arch_get_unmapped_exec_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr0,
unsigned long len0, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
...
if (!addr)
addr = !should_randomize() ? SHLIB_BASE :
randomize_range(SHLIB_BASE, 0x01000000, len);
...
}
Looks like it is considered as a way to easily mmap libraries in CS
limited area by exec-shield, and not as a C-string barrier.
The comment says the common bottom-up doesn't support randomization:
/*
* Bottom-up (legacy) layout on X86_32 did not support randomization, X86_64
* does, but not when emulating X86_32
*/
So, IMO the bottom-up layout allocator should be patched.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-23 16:22 [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs Solar Designer
2011-07-24 8:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 14:27 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-11 8:32 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 3:57 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 4:21 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 8:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 9:20 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 9:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 10:04 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 10:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 9:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-07-30 18:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110729092712.GA7727@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox