From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] 32/64 bitness restriction for pid namespace
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:12:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110813151220.GA8388@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110812122343.GA7859@openwall.com>
Solar,
Re: slowdown - my assumptions are:
1) we don't want any slowdown for legitimate tasks - 64 bit tasks for 64
bit containers and 32 bit tasks for 32 bit containers.
2) slowdown of malicious (or broken) tasks is not important.
Looking into asm code:
ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
...
GET_THREAD_INFO(%r10)
...
testl $_TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY,TI_flags(%r10)
CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
jnz sysenter_tracesys
...
sysenter_tracesys:
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
testl $(_TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY & ~_TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT),TI_flags(%r10)
jz sysenter_auditsys
#endif
...
call syscall_trace_enter
...
/* work to do in syscall_trace_enter() */
#define _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY \
(_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
_TIF_SECCOMP | _TIF_SINGLESTEP | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
So, there is a mask, which is used to identify whether a syscall needs
additional pre/post processing. If divide syscall_trace_enter() into 3
functions, we'll get what we want. This will result in zero impact on
the legitimate code (relavite to current behaviour).
One drawback - *tracesys clobbers EAX/RAX, so I still have to patch asm.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-13 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-07 11:00 [kernel-hardening] 32/64 bitness restriction for pid namespace Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-08 17:39 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 9:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 13:03 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-08-10 13:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 14:26 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-10 15:02 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 15:40 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-10 16:21 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 16:42 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 12:07 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 12:23 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-13 15:12 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-08-13 15:19 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-13 16:55 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-13 17:31 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-13 19:25 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-13 19:22 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-14 9:50 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-14 10:16 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-14 11:29 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-14 11:55 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-14 12:04 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-14 12:16 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-15 15:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-15 21:33 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-16 6:39 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-15 21:46 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-16 6:25 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-18 10:34 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-18 14:42 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 9:09 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110813151220.GA8388@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox