From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
keescook@chromium.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
panand@redhat.com, keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64/uaccess: Add hardened usercopy check for bad stack accesses
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:29:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216182917.19637-4-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216182917.19637-1-james.morse@arm.com>
lkdtm tests copy_{to,from}_user() by trying to copy an address range
on the stack that isn't yet part of a stack frame.
By the time the stack walker is invoked to check that the object being
copied doesn't overlap stack frame, the invalid range is part of a valid
stack frame. Discarding a constant number of frames is fragile as different
compiler versions may make different inline choices.
Instead, add a check that the object isn't between the current stack
pointer and the end of the stack. Add this early enough that it should
be inlined into the caller.
CC: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 46da3ea638bb..d3494840a61c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -356,6 +356,22 @@ do { \
-EFAULT; \
})
+static inline void check_obj_in_unused_stack(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long stack = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(current);
+
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(len) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY) || !len)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If current_stack_pointer is on the task stack, obj must not lie
+ * between current_stack_pointer and the last stack address.
+ */
+ if ((current_stack_pointer & ~(THREAD_SIZE-1)) == stack)
+ BUG_ON(stack <= (unsigned long)obj &&
+ (unsigned long)obj < current_stack_pointer);
+}
+
extern unsigned long __must_check __arch_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
extern unsigned long __must_check __arch_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
extern unsigned long __must_check __copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
@@ -364,6 +380,7 @@ extern unsigned long __must_check __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long
static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
{
kasan_check_write(to, n);
+ check_obj_in_unused_stack(to, n);
check_object_size(to, n, false);
return __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
}
@@ -371,6 +388,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_from_user(void *to, const void _
static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
{
kasan_check_read(from, n);
+ check_obj_in_unused_stack(from, n);
check_object_size(from, n, true);
return __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
}
@@ -381,6 +399,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_from_user(void *to, const void __u
kasan_check_write(to, n);
if (access_ok(VERIFY_READ, from, n)) {
+ check_obj_in_unused_stack(to, n);
check_object_size(to, n, false);
res = __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
}
@@ -394,6 +413,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_to_user(void __user *to, const voi
kasan_check_read(from, n);
if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n)) {
+ check_obj_in_unused_stack(from, n);
check_object_size(from, n, true);
n = __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
}
--
2.10.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 18:29 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation James Morse
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type James Morse
2017-04-04 22:19 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: Add arch_within_stack_frames() for hardened usercopy James Morse
2017-02-17 0:47 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` James Morse [this message]
2017-02-17 0:44 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64/uaccess: Add hardened usercopy check for bad stack accesses Kees Cook
2017-02-17 18:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " Keun-O Park
2017-03-30 8:32 ` James Morse
2017-02-17 0:54 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation Kees Cook
2017-03-28 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-30 8:30 ` James Morse
2017-03-30 19:54 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216182917.19637-4-james.morse@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox