From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:30:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58DCC21C.6040705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKhVzH9OB6QgGb1u0sbnFGn5J72FnzNeGo076f52Scn+A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Kees,
On 28/03/17 23:34, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:29 AM, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>>> This version of Sahara's arch_within_stack_frames() series replaces the
>>> open-coded stack walker with a call to arm64's existing walker.
> Is this still in progress? Seemed like it was very close?
Ah, sorry, I lost track of this when it jumped between mail folders... Sahara
had comments on the last patch.
How does all this fit with Al Viro's uaccess unification tree?:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/29/61
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 18:29 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation James Morse
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type James Morse
2017-04-04 22:19 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: Add arch_within_stack_frames() for hardened usercopy James Morse
2017-02-17 0:47 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64/uaccess: Add hardened usercopy check for bad stack accesses James Morse
2017-02-17 0:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-17 18:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " Keun-O Park
2017-03-30 8:32 ` James Morse
2017-02-17 0:54 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation Kees Cook
2017-03-28 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-30 8:30 ` James Morse [this message]
2017-03-30 19:54 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58DCC21C.6040705@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox