Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. S

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

Alex,

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:41:52PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> Fengguang,
> 
>   Do you want to send a formal patch, or should I just fix in my next radeon -fixes pull request?

Since it's a trivial fix, would you just fix it in your tree?

Thanks,
Fengguang

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian König [mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:26 AM
> > To: Fengguang Wu
> > Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Deucher, Alexander; Cherkasov, Dmitrii
> > Subject: Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol
> > 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Hi Fengguang,
> > 
> > yes that's correct the function should be static.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Christian.
> > 
> > On 17.10.2012 08:44, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > FYI, there are new sparse warnings show up in
> > >
> > > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux master
> > > head:   8d2b6b3ae280dcf6f6c7a95623670a57cdf562ed
> > > commit: 90a51a329258e3c868f6f4c1fb264ca01c590c57 drm/radeon: allocate
> > page tables on demand v4
> > > date:   2 days ago
> > >
> > > + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol
> > 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >
> > > vim +580 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
> > >
> > > 09db8644 Alex Deucher    2012-07-17  569  /**
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  570   * radeon_vm_evict - evict page
> > table to make room for new one
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  571   *
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  572   * @rdev: radeon_device pointer
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  573   * @vm: VM we want to allocate
> > something for
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  574   *
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  575   * Evict a VM from the lru, making
> > sure that it isn't @vm. (cayman+).
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  576   * Returns 0 for success, -
> > ENOMEM for failure.
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  577   *
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  578   * Global and local mutex must be
> > locked!
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  579   */
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 @580  int radeon_vm_evict(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm)
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  581  {
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  582  	struct radeon_vm *vm_evict;
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  583
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  584  	if (list_empty(&rdev-
> > >vm_manager.lru_vm))
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  585  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  586
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  587  	vm_evict > > list_first_entry(&rdev->vm_manager.lru_vm,
> > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09  588
> > struct radeon_vm, list);
> > >
> > > Shall we apply the attached diff?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fengguang
> > 
>