* [patch] selinux: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2013-03-16 9:48 Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-03-16 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
The call tree here is:
sk_clone_lock() <- takes bh_lock_sock(newsk);
xfrm_sk_clone_policy()
__xfrm_sk_clone_policy()
clone_policy() <- uses GFP_ATOMIC for allocations
security_xfrm_policy_clone()
security_ops->xfrm_policy_clone_security()
selinux_xfrm_policy_clone()
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
Static checker work.
diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index 48665ec..8ab2951 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *old_ctx,
if (old_ctx) {
new_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new_ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-03-16 9:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-16 9:48 [patch] selinux: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox