* [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*"
@ 2018-12-21 8:48 Colin King
2018-12-21 12:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2018-12-21 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Alexander Shishkin
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these.
Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
+++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg)
{
bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
- const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_";
+ const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_";
int op = arg->val;
size_t printed = 0;
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size,
struct syscall_arg *arg)
{
bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
- const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
+ const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
int printed = 0, flags = arg->val;
#define P_FLAG(n) \
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*"
2018-12-21 8:48 [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*" Colin King
@ 2018-12-21 12:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2018-12-21 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Alexander Shishkin, kernel-janitors,
linux-kernel
Em Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:48:09AM +0000, Colin King escreveu:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg)
> {
> bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_";
> + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_";
> int op = arg->val;
> size_t printed = 0;
>
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size,
> struct syscall_arg *arg)
> {
> bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
> + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
> int printed = 0, flags = arg->val;
>
> #define P_FLAG(n) \
> --
> 2.19.1
--
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-21 12:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-21 8:48 [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*" Colin King
2018-12-21 12:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox