* Re: [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks [not found] <20251012115035.2169-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> @ 2025-10-12 13:26 ` Markus Elfring 2025-10-13 2:14 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2025-10-12 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Li RongQing, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, netdev, linux-arm-kernel, linux-aspeed, wireguard, Andrew Jeffery, Andrew Morton, Anshuman Khandual, Arnd Bergmann, David Hildenbrand, Feng Tang, Florian Westphal, Jakub Kicinski, Jason A . Donenfeld, Joel Granados, Joel Stanley, Jonathan Corbet, Kees Cook, Lance Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Lorenzo Stoakes, Masami Hiramatsu, Paul E . McKenney, Pawan Gupta, Petr Mladek, Phil Auld, Randy Dunlap, Russell King, Shuah Khan, Simon Horman, Stanislav Fomichev, Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors … > This patch extends the … Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved change description? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94 … > +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c … @@ -229,9 +232,11 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout) … > trace_sched_process_hang(t); > > - if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) { > + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && > + (total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic)) { … I suggest to use the following source code variant instead. if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic) { Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks 2025-10-12 13:26 ` [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks Markus Elfring @ 2025-10-13 2:14 ` Li,Rongqing 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Li,Rongqing @ 2025-10-13 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus Elfring, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, Andrew Jeffery, Andrew Morton, Anshuman Khandual, Arnd Bergmann, David Hildenbrand, Feng Tang, Florian Westphal, Jakub Kicinski, Jason A . Donenfeld, Joel Granados, Joel Stanley, Jonathan Corbet, Kees Cook, Lance Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Lorenzo Stoakes, Masami Hiramatsu, Paul E . McKenney, Pawan Gupta, Petr Mladek, Phil Auld, Randy Dunlap, Russell King, Shuah Khan, Simon Horman, Stanislav Fomichev, Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > … > > This patch extends the … > > Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an > improved change description? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docum > entation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94 > will fix in next version > > … > > +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c > … > @@ -229,9 +232,11 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, > unsigned long timeout) … > > trace_sched_process_hang(t); > > > > - if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) { > > + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && > > + (total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic)) { > … > > I suggest to use the following source code variant instead. > > if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic) > { > will fix in next version thanks -Li > > Regards, > Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-13 2:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20251012115035.2169-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
2025-10-12 13:26 ` [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks Markus Elfring
2025-10-13 2:14 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox