Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature

Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature

[SF Markus Elfring]

> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report

Where do you want to reuse these variables in your SmPL scripts?


> +@match@
> +identifier f,ret;
> +position p;
> +type T1,T2;
> +@@
> +
> +T1 f(...) {
> + T2 ret;

Will it be more helpful to mark only such variable declarations
where the specified data type should be reconsidered
by a minus character or an asterisk (instead of the following
return statement)?

> +<+...
> +* return@p ret
> +;
> +...+>
> +}


Regards,
Markus