From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
Xinhui.Pan@amd.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Use bitmap_zalloc() when applicable
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:47:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a426b3-ece2-129c-edca-03556e1ecbb6@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14268d5a-9a4a-2921-9961-d5d36fad47b2@amd.com>
Le 26/04/2022 à 20:01, Felix Kuehling a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I just stumbled over this patch series while cleaning up my inbox. Sorry
> for dropping it back in November. I'm about to apply it but I noticed
> that patch 1 is missing a Signed-off-by. Is it OK to add that in your name?
Hi,
No problem for me if you can add it. Thanks.
But if you prefer a v2, it is also fine for me.
BTW sorry for missing the SoB tag. This definitively means that I forgot
the checkpatch.pl step for this patch, which is bad.
CJ
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
>
> Am 2021-11-28 um 11:45 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> 'kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap' is a bitmap. So use 'bitmap_zalloc()' to simplify
>> code, improve the semantic and avoid some open-coded arithmetic in
>> allocator arguments.
>>
>> Also change the corresponding 'kfree()' into 'bitmap_free()' to keep
>> consistency.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 12 +++---------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> index e1294fba0c26..c5a0ce44a295 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> @@ -1252,8 +1252,6 @@ int
>> kgd2kfd_schedule_evict_and_restore_process(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev *kfd, unsigned int buf_size,
>> unsigned int chunk_size)
>> {
>> - unsigned int num_of_longs;
>> -
>> if (WARN_ON(buf_size < chunk_size))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> if (WARN_ON(buf_size == 0))
>> @@ -1264,11 +1262,8 @@ static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev *kfd,
>> unsigned int buf_size,
>> kfd->gtt_sa_chunk_size = chunk_size;
>> kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks = buf_size / chunk_size;
>> - num_of_longs = (kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks + BITS_PER_LONG - 1) /
>> - BITS_PER_LONG;
>> -
>> - kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap = kcalloc(num_of_longs, sizeof(long),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> -
>> + kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -1278,13 +1273,12 @@ static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev
>> *kfd, unsigned int buf_size,
>> mutex_init(&kfd->gtt_sa_lock);
>> return 0;
>> -
>> }
>> static void kfd_gtt_sa_fini(struct kfd_dev *kfd)
>> {
>> mutex_destroy(&kfd->gtt_sa_lock);
>> - kfree(kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap);
>> + bitmap_free(kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap);
>> }
>> static inline uint64_t kfd_gtt_sa_calc_gpu_addr(uint64_t start_addr,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Use bitmap_zalloc() when applicable
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:47:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a426b3-ece2-129c-edca-03556e1ecbb6@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220426184720.wzu7-wb5evfDzG-zYGx32bhmbsYYe-mMR7J2sl_Hvz0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14268d5a-9a4a-2921-9961-d5d36fad47b2@amd.com>
Le 26/04/2022 à 20:01, Felix Kuehling a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I just stumbled over this patch series while cleaning up my inbox. Sorry
> for dropping it back in November. I'm about to apply it but I noticed
> that patch 1 is missing a Signed-off-by. Is it OK to add that in your name?
Hi,
No problem for me if you can add it. Thanks.
But if you prefer a v2, it is also fine for me.
BTW sorry for missing the SoB tag. This definitively means that I forgot
the checkpatch.pl step for this patch, which is bad.
CJ
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
>
> Am 2021-11-28 um 11:45 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> 'kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap' is a bitmap. So use 'bitmap_zalloc()' to simplify
>> code, improve the semantic and avoid some open-coded arithmetic in
>> allocator arguments.
>>
>> Also change the corresponding 'kfree()' into 'bitmap_free()' to keep
>> consistency.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 12 +++---------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> index e1294fba0c26..c5a0ce44a295 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>> @@ -1252,8 +1252,6 @@ int
>> kgd2kfd_schedule_evict_and_restore_process(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev *kfd, unsigned int buf_size,
>> unsigned int chunk_size)
>> {
>> - unsigned int num_of_longs;
>> -
>> if (WARN_ON(buf_size < chunk_size))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> if (WARN_ON(buf_size == 0))
>> @@ -1264,11 +1262,8 @@ static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev *kfd,
>> unsigned int buf_size,
>> kfd->gtt_sa_chunk_size = chunk_size;
>> kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks = buf_size / chunk_size;
>> - num_of_longs = (kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks + BITS_PER_LONG - 1) /
>> - BITS_PER_LONG;
>> -
>> - kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap = kcalloc(num_of_longs, sizeof(long),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> -
>> + kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(kfd->gtt_sa_num_of_chunks,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -1278,13 +1273,12 @@ static int kfd_gtt_sa_init(struct kfd_dev
>> *kfd, unsigned int buf_size,
>> mutex_init(&kfd->gtt_sa_lock);
>> return 0;
>> -
>> }
>> static void kfd_gtt_sa_fini(struct kfd_dev *kfd)
>> {
>> mutex_destroy(&kfd->gtt_sa_lock);
>> - kfree(kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap);
>> + bitmap_free(kfd->gtt_sa_bitmap);
>> }
>> static inline uint64_t kfd_gtt_sa_calc_gpu_addr(uint64_t start_addr,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-28 16:45 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Use bitmap_zalloc() when applicable Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-28 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdkfd: Use non-atomic bitmap functions when possible Christophe JAILLET
2022-04-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Use bitmap_zalloc() when applicable Felix Kuehling
2022-04-26 18:47 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2022-04-26 18:47 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-04-26 20:54 ` Felix Kuehling
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-21 17:41 Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-22 22:10 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80a426b3-ece2-129c-edca-03556e1ecbb6@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox