* Re: [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write()
2019-01-25 2:30 [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write() YueHaibing
@ 2019-01-25 5:41 ` Julia Lawall
2019-01-25 7:57 ` YueHaibing
2019-01-25 14:59 ` Julia Lawall
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2019-01-25 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing
Cc: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, James Morse, linux-edac,
kernel-janitors
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, YueHaibing wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'enum hw_event_mc_err_typetype' variable
> static since new value always be assigned before use it.
How did you find this? If you used some tool, it would really be kind if
you would reference that tool. People who make tools may need to justify
that the time that they spend doing so is worthwhile.
julia
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> index 0a92772..6736543 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ static ssize_t edac_fake_inject_write(struct file *file,
> {
> struct device *dev = file->private_data;
> struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev);
> - static enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
> + enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
> u16 errcount = mci->fake_inject_count;
>
> if (!errcount)
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write()
2019-01-25 2:30 [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write() YueHaibing
2019-01-25 5:41 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2019-01-25 7:57 ` YueHaibing
2019-01-25 14:59 ` Julia Lawall
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2019-01-25 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, James Morse, linux-edac,
kernel-janitors
On 2019/1/25 13:41, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, YueHaibing wrote:
>
>> There is no need to have the 'enum hw_event_mc_err_typetype' variable
>> static since new value always be assigned before use it.
>
> How did you find this? If you used some tool, it would really be kind if
> you would reference that tool. People who make tools may need to justify
> that the time that they spend doing so is worthwhile.
Sure, the tool exists in https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch
which run a coccinelle script
>
> julia
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/edac/debugfs.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
>> index 0a92772..6736543 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ static ssize_t edac_fake_inject_write(struct file *file,
>> {
>> struct device *dev = file->private_data;
>> struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev);
>> - static enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
>> + enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
>> u16 errcount = mci->fake_inject_count;
>>
>> if (!errcount)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write()
2019-01-25 2:30 [PATCH -next] EDAC: Drop pointless static qualifier in edac_fake_inject_write() YueHaibing
2019-01-25 5:41 ` Julia Lawall
2019-01-25 7:57 ` YueHaibing
@ 2019-01-25 14:59 ` Julia Lawall
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2019-01-25 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing
Cc: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, James Morse, linux-edac,
kernel-janitors
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, YueHaibing wrote:
> On 2019/1/25 13:41, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, YueHaibing wrote:
> >
> >> There is no need to have the 'enum hw_event_mc_err_typetype' variable
> >> static since new value always be assigned before use it.
> >
> > How did you find this? If you used some tool, it would really be kind if
> > you would reference that tool. People who make tools may need to justify
> > that the time that they spend doing so is worthwhile.
>
>
> Sure, the tool exists in https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch
>
> which run a coccinelle script
OK, so your could say: Found using dpatch running a Coccinelle rule. Or
something like that.
julia
>
> >
> > julia
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/edac/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> >> index 0a92772..6736543 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/edac/debugfs.c
> >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ static ssize_t edac_fake_inject_write(struct file *file,
> >> {
> >> struct device *dev = file->private_data;
> >> struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev);
> >> - static enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
> >> + enum hw_event_mc_err_type type;
> >> u16 errcount = mci->fake_inject_count;
> >>
> >> if (!errcount)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread