3.0-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.39

3.0-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.39

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.39,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.39, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2011-06-26       22       14          12
  2011-06-12        8        7           7


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38302
Subject		: NFS crash in un-modified 3.0.0-rc3+, list corruption.
Submitter	: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date		: 2011-06-20 22:42 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <4DFFCCDC.2070106@candelatech.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130860979610651&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
Subject		: slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects
Submitter	: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date		: 2011-06-20 17:48 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <1308592080.26237.114.camel@twins>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130859214215636&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
Subject		: acpi_power_off lockdep splat
Submitter	: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date		: 2011-06-19 13:30 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110619133049.GA18168@liondog.tnic>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130849028317365&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38142
Subject		: i915, framebuffer: wrong xoffset?
Submitter	: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-06-18 16:29 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <BANLkTikAJEma_NNi0NYnjBEB6RkFJK3Dpg@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130841462202826&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38122
Subject		: 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()
Submitter	: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Date		: 2011-06-14 12:12 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <<4DE3E2C9.6060207@fusionio.com>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130805412314680&w=2
		  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/30/261


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37562
Subject		: /scripts/depmod.sh ends up -rw-r--r-- 1 depmod.sh
Submitter	: Andrew <atswartz@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-06-15 23:49 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37482
Subject		: Driver: i915 - Starting with kernel 3.0.0-rc3, dual monitor freezes a Dell Latitude E6410 when a second monitor is connected at boot time
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2011-06-14 18:42 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37432
Subject		: sdhci-pci fails on 3.0.0-rc1 on Dell E6510
Submitter	: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Date		: 2011-06-07 20:06 (20 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/da7822e5ad71ec9b745b412639f1e5e0ba795a20
References	: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/8442


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
Date		: 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
Message-ID	: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS@segfault.sh0n.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36972
Subject		: 3.0-rc1: DMAR errors from iwlagn
Submitter	: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Date		: 2011-05-31 21:14 (27 days old)
Message-ID	: <4DE55A26.6040702@goop.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130687723213857&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36452
Subject		: Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge
Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-06-01 13:55 (26 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36302
Subject		: SandyBridge can't do s2disk with linux 3.0-rc1
Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-05-30 23:10 (28 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38012
Subject		: Missing code to load firmware
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2011-06-20 21:44 (7 days old)
Handled-By	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63002


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37542
Subject		: [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs
Submitter	: Martijn Uffing <mp3project@sarijopen.student.utwente.nl>
Date		: 2011-06-09 20:15 (18 days old)
Message-ID	: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1106092211500.19687@sarijopen.student.utwente.nl>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130765235926144&w=2
Handled-By	: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63202


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.39,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

[Bug #36302] SandyBridge can't do s2disk with linux 3.0-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36302
Subject		: SandyBridge can't do s2disk with linux 3.0-rc1
Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-05-30 23:10 (28 days old)

[Bug #36972] 3.0-rc1: DMAR errors from iwlagn

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36972
Subject		: 3.0-rc1: DMAR errors from iwlagn
Submitter	: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-05-31 21:14 (27 days old)
Message-ID	: <4DE55A26.6040702-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130687723213857&w=2

[Bug #37482] Driver: i915 - Starting with kernel 3.0.0-rc3, dual monitor freezes a Dell Latitude E6410 when a second monitor is connected at boot time

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37482
Subject		: Driver: i915 - Starting with kernel 3.0.0-rc3, dual monitor freezes a Dell Latitude E6410 when a second monitor is connected at boot time
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-14 18:42 (13 days old)

[Bug #37542] [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37542
Subject		: [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs
Submitter	: Martijn Uffing <mp3project-dT/mdtNybfnOcQoxchNua+fsyHJTGBv43KldkOmuLK4@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-09 20:15 (18 days old)
Message-ID	: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1106092211500.19687-dT/mdtNybfnOcQoxchNua+fsyHJTGBv43KldkOmuLK4@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130765235926144&w=2
Handled-By	: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63202

Re: [Bug #37542] [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs

[Martijn Uffing]

Ave

The OOPS/BUG is fixed by 2 patches. Both patches are already included in 
the linus git tree.

A patch for the separate issue to demote the superfluous kernel messages 
from error to debug level is available, but not yet included in linus git.
I will track this patch and ping the author if it isn't included in one of 
the final rc's.

As far as I am concerned, this bug can be removed from the regression 
list.

Martijn

-----------------------------------------
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

When it comes to procrastination, casting the first stone is definitely on
my TO DO list.



On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37542
> Subject		: [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs
> Submitter	: Martijn Uffing <mp3project@sarijopen.student.utwente.nl>
> Date		: 2011-06-09 20:15 (18 days old)
> Message-ID	: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1106092211500.19687@sarijopen.student.utwente.nl>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130765235926144&w=2
> Handled-By	: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63202
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #37542] [OOPS] 3.0-rc1 cifs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, June 27, 2011, Martijn Uffing wrote:
> Ave
> 
> The OOPS/BUG is fixed by 2 patches. Both patches are already included in 
> the linus git tree.
> 
> A patch for the separate issue to demote the superfluous kernel messages 
> from error to debug level is available, but not yet included in linus git.
> I will track this patch and ping the author if it isn't included in one of 
> the final rc's.
> 
> As far as I am concerned, this bug can be removed from the regression 
> list.

Cool, thanks, closing.

Rafael

[Bug #36452] Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36452
Subject		: Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge
Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-01 13:55 (26 days old)

Re: [Bug #36452] Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge

[Jesse Barnes]

On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36452
> Subject		: Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge
> Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2011-06-01 13:55 (26 days old)

Is this with integrated or discrete graphics?  Have you tried to bisect
yet?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #36452] Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge

[Alexander Zhaunerchyk]

This was with integrated graphics. But seems this is fixed in rc5 or 
rc5+ because after compiling rc5 I  didn't see these artifacts anymore

On 29.06.2011 19:47, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36452
>> Subject		: Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge
>> Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik<alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date		: 2011-06-01 13:55 (26 days old)
> Is this with integrated or discrete graphics?  Have you tried to bisect
> yet?
>

Re: [Bug #36452] Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, Alexander Zhaunerchyk wrote:
> This was with integrated graphics. But seems this is fixed in rc5 or 
> rc5+ because after compiling rc5 I  didn't see these artifacts anymore

OK, I'm closing the bug then.

Thanks,
Rafael


> On 29.06.2011 19:47, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> >
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> >> of recent regressions.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> >> know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36452
> >> Subject		: Artifacts with 3.0-rc1 on SandyBridge
> >> Submitter	: Alex Zhavnerchik<alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date		: 2011-06-01 13:55 (26 days old)
> > Is this with integrated or discrete graphics?  Have you tried to bisect
> > yet?
> >
> 
> 

[Bug #37432] sdhci-pci fails on 3.0.0-rc1 on Dell E6510

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37432
Subject		: sdhci-pci fails on 3.0.0-rc1 on Dell E6510
Submitter	: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-07 20:06 (20 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/da7822e5ad71ec9b745b412639f1e5e0ba795a20
References	: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/8442

[Bug #37232] [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
Message-ID	: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS-RRHT56Q3PSMGBMjmSbuoWl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2

Re: [Bug #37232] [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0

[Shawn Starr]

On Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:23:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team know (either way).
> 
This continues in -rc4, although Fedora has a patch to try to fix some DMAR 
errors, it doesn't seem to work for me.

03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] 
Network Connection

[ 1046.002195] DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr ffda6000 
[ 1046.002198] DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
[ 1048.189224] DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
[ 1048.189240] DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr ffd94000 
[ 1048.189244] DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set

$ uname -a
Linux segfault.sh0n.net 3.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 22 
16:27:16 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x

Perhaps someone from Intel can comment on why this broke recently? It's not 
causing me issues, just noise in logs/dmesg.

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
> Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) 
for
> reason a1 on CPU 0 Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> Message-ID	: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS-RRHT56Q3PSMGBMjmSbuoWl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2

Re: [Bug #37232] [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:23:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> This continues in -rc4, although Fedora has a patch to try to fix some DMAR 
> errors, it doesn't seem to work for me.
> 
> 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] 
> Network Connection
> 
> [ 1046.002195] DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr ffda6000 
> [ 1046.002198] DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
> [ 1048.189224] DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> [ 1048.189240] DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr ffd94000 
> [ 1048.189244] DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
> 
> $ uname -a
> Linux segfault.sh0n.net 3.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 22 
> 16:27:16 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x
> 
> Perhaps someone from Intel can comment on why this broke recently? It's not 
> causing me issues, just noise in logs/dmesg.
> 
>
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
> > Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) 
> for
> > reason a1 on CPU 0 Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS-RRHT56Q3PSMGBMjmSbuoWl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #37232] [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0

[Shawn Starr]

>>>On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:32:12 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:23:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> > report of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
> > Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0
> > Submitter	: Shawn Starr <XXXX.XX-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		     : 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS-RRHT56Q3PSMGBMjmSbuoWl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2

>>> Thanks for the update.
>>> Rafael

Hello Rafael/Linux devs,

You can close this bug now, regression is gone now. Both the SERR and the DMAR  (coming from iwlagn)
errors are resolved.

Working in: -rc5 (Fedora rawhide 3.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc16.x86_64)

Thanks,
Shawn.

Re: [Bug #37232] [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0

[Florian Mickler]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:57:57 -0400
Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> >>>On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:32:12 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:23:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> > > report of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > > tracking team know (either way).
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37232
> > > Subject		: [3.0-rc1][NMI/DMAR][iwlagn] errors - PCI system error (SERR) for reason a1 on CPU 0
> > > Submitter	: Shawn Starr <XXXX.XX-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date		     : 2011-06-03 4:56 (24 days old)
> > > Message-ID: <4478124.OuFNgaPiHS-RRHT56Q3PSMGBMjmSbuoWl6hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org>
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130707737616116&w=2
> 
> >>> Thanks for the update.
> >>> Rafael
> 
> Hello Rafael/Linux devs,
> 
> You can close this bug now, regression is gone now. Both the SERR and the DMAR  (coming from iwlagn)
> errors are resolved.
> 
> Working in: -rc5 (Fedora rawhide 3.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc16.x86_64)
> 

Is this a vanilla linux kernel or has it out of tree patches?

> Thanks,
> Shawn.

[Bug #37562] /scripts/depmod.sh ends up -rw-r--r-- 1 depmod.sh

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37562
Subject		: /scripts/depmod.sh ends up -rw-r--r-- 1 depmod.sh
Submitter	: Andrew <atswartz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-15 23:49 (12 days old)

[Bug #38012] Missing code to load firmware

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38012
Subject		: Missing code to load firmware
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2011-06-20 21:44 (7 days old)
Handled-By	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63002

Re: [Bug #38012] Missing code to load firmware

[Larry Finger]

On 06/26/2011 04:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38012
> Subject		: Missing code to load firmware
> Submitter	: Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Date		: 2011-06-20 21:44 (7 days old)
> Handled-By	: Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63002

The patch has been incorporated into Linville's wireless-testing tree and has 
been pushed upstream. It should be in mainline soon.

Larry

Re: [Bug #38012] Missing code to load firmware

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, June 27, 2011, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 04:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38012
> > Subject		: Missing code to load firmware
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2011-06-20 21:44 (7 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=63002
> 
> The patch has been incorporated into Linville's wireless-testing tree and has 
> been pushed upstream. It should be in mainline soon.

Great, please close the bug when it hits mainline.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #38152] acpi_power_off lockdep splat

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
Subject		: acpi_power_off lockdep splat
Submitter	: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date		: 2011-06-19 13:30 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110619133049.GA18168@liondog.tnic>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130849028317365&w=2

[Bug #38122] 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38122
Subject		: 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()
Submitter	: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Date		: 2011-06-14 12:12 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <<4DE3E2C9.6060207@fusionio.com>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130805412314680&w=2
		  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/30/261

Re: [Bug #38122] 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()

[Jens Axboe]

On 2011-06-26 23:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38122
> Subject		: 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()
> Submitter	: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
> Date		: 2011-06-14 12:12 (13 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<4DE3E2C9.6060207@fusionio.com>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130805412314680&w=2
> 		  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/30/261

By the looks of it, commit 483f1798 should fix it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [Bug #38122] 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, June 27, 2011, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-06-26 23:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38122
> > Subject		: 3.0-rc3 WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:340 gen6_gt_force_wake_put+0x29/0x52 [i915]()
> > Submitter	: Jens Axboe <jaxboe-5c4llco8/ftWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2011-06-14 12:12 (13 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <<4DE3E2C9.6060207-5c4llco8/ftWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130805412314680&w=2
> > 		  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/30/261
> 
> By the looks of it, commit 483f1798 should fix it.

Thanks for the info, closed already.

Take care,
Rafael

[Bug #38142] i915, framebuffer: wrong xoffset?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38142
Subject		: i915, framebuffer: wrong xoffset?
Submitter	: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-18 16:29 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <BANLkTikAJEma_NNi0NYnjBEB6RkFJK3Dpg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130841462202826&w=2

[Bug #38302] NFS crash in un-modified 3.0.0-rc3+, list corruption.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38302
Subject		: NFS crash in un-modified 3.0.0-rc3+, list corruption.
Submitter	: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date		: 2011-06-20 22:42 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <4DFFCCDC.2070106@candelatech.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130860979610651&w=2

[Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
Subject		: slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects
Submitter	: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date		: 2011-06-20 17:48 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <1308592080.26237.114.camel@twins>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130859214215636&w=2

Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).

who said its a regression?

Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> 
> who said its a regression?

I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep 
message in it and assumed it was a new one?

Instead it's one that always had the chance to trigger?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, June 27, 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> > 
> > who said its a regression?
> 
> I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep 
> message in it and assumed it was a new one?

Actually, Maciej did. :-)

I'll drop it from the regression list.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:31 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> > 
> > who said its a regression?
> 
> I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep 
> message in it and assumed it was a new one?
> 
> Instead it's one that always had the chance to trigger?

Yeah, its just terribly hard, you need all the various debug options
enabled and a lot of luck. There's nothing involved that changed
recently afaik.