* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
[not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-03-24 11:32 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
Kernel Testers List
>> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>:
>> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine?
>>
>> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree.
>
> I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose
> this locally.
Hi David
2.6.29 also does not work.
The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29
even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29
I can try to bisect.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
2009-03-24 11:32 ` next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets Alexander Beregalov
@ 2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, Roel Kluin
Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next, Kernel Testers List
2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
>>> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine?
>>>
>>> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree.
>>
>> I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose
>> this locally.
>
> Hi David
>
> 2.6.29 also does not work.
>
> The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29
>
> even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29
>
> I can try to bisect.
e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 is first bad commit
commit e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615
Author: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Mar 18 23:12:13 2009 -0700
net: kfree(napi->skb) => kfree_skb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov
@ 2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 20:23 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, Roel Kluin
Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next, Kernel Testers List
2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
> 2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
>>>> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree.
>>>
>>> I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose
>>> this locally.
>>
>> Hi David
>>
>> 2.6.29 also does not work.
>>
>> The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29
>>
>> even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29
>>
>> I can try to bisect.
>
> e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 is first bad commit
No, it is wrong, sorry.
I will do more tests tomorrow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-24 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <a4423d670903180958j4847717eh99a41534633dd314@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090318.234451.38898787.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <a4423d670903190116p157b2ebfl69d270e0576c6d9a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-24 11:32 ` next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 20:23 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox