2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34

public inbox for kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
@ 2010-07-23 11:42 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:42 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (35 more replies)
  0 siblings, 36 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
	Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
	Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2010-07-23       94       33          25
  2010-07-09       79       45          37
  2010-06-21       46       37          26
  2010-06-09       15       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject		: netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter	: auto401300-revL73yDgGBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Date		: 2010-07-17 10:20 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100717072036.1BBE52804B-hP6SDYDcl0Dn1WiER8SD9wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject		: Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter	: divya <dipraksh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-16 8:50 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C401D56.3070108-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject		: Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter	: John Mesmon <jmesmon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-15 23:40 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By	: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-kernel-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter	: Martin Pirker <lkml.collector-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-14 20:33 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTikDF0TL6OyPVCzPlUTwxFehcrETn3ysgSSeTq92-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject		: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-13 8:14 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID	: <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject		: kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter	: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus-xp2qqqlHh3xzoYq+O6RWwA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-14 13:52 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100714135217.GA1797-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16392
Subject		: BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5
Submitter	: Ortwin Gl√ºck <odi-L693kI9kcNY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-14 6:54 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C3D5F3F.7070901-L693kI9kcNY@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127909052705341&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16383
Subject		: Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5
Submitter	: Stefan Behte <craig-Iv0PAbYRtitM7kwft8N7nw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-14 00:44 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject		: Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter	: Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem-VInPYn6yXxRWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-13 23:21 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16372
Subject		: Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken
Submitter	: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-11 19:56 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTimkNg81yzxSHTcAa1QlTE9SYmvzL4eOTVHApWq3-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127887822407672&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16369
Subject		: Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)?
Submitter	: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-09 14:21 (15 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C373084.8000503-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127868797119254&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16365
Subject		: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353
Submitter	: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte-3kN+8DYepx7zMJDuovMtMLNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-08 14:27 (16 days old)
Message-ID	: <201007081627.24654.johannes.hirte-3kN+8DYepx7zMJDuovMtMLNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127859960725931&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332
Subject		: Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open)
Submitter	: werner-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org
Date		: 2010-07-02 3:34 (22 days old)
Message-ID	: <1278041650.12788-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject		: WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter	: boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org-ro/BP3KN3ujR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-01 13:54 (23 days old)
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject		: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-28 9:40 (26 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
Subject		: [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-28 0:45 (26 days old)
Message-ID	: <<201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject		: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter	: Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-09 18:36 (45 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID	: <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb-UK71uKi2zisAobODsErMgNi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257
Subject		: sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-20 11:23 (34 days old)
References	: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
		  Kay Sievers <kay.sievers-tD+1rO4QERM@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject		: BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter	: Brian Bloniarz <phunge0-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-16 17:57 (38 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-11 20:31 (43 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201
Subject		: SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
Submitter	: nuh <nuh-hRtevi7K+EWJQ7yn63+t2w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-14 10:45 (40 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject		: Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter	: Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-12 04:17 (42 days old)
Handled-By	: Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject		: After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-09 23:25 (45 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject		: [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter	: tomas m <tmezzadra-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-15 02:32 (9 days old)
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/113108/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
Subject		: 2.6.35 regression
Submitter	: Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-05 13:04 (19 days old)
Message-ID	: <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2
Handled-By	: Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310
Subject		: arm omap invalid module format
Submitter	: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-28 17:30 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c
Handled-By	: Michal Marek <mmarek-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294
Subject		: [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
Submitter	: Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-25 18:20 (29 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad
Handled-By	: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/111130/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278
Subject		: lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35
Submitter	: Phillip Susi <psusi-3tLf1voIkJTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-23 16:55 (31 days old)
Handled-By	: Eric Sandeen <sandeen-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
Submitter	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-21 16:03 (33 days old)
Message-ID	: <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256
Subject		: tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34
Submitter	: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-20 11:15 (34 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa
Handled-By	: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215
Subject		: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0'
Submitter	: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt-NCk8gXQAEuFz6jiHbVrK7g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-15 14:55 (39 days old)
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 12:33   ` Eric W. Biederman
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (34 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill,
	Eric W. Biederman, H. Peter Anvin

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject		: After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-09 23:25 (45 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
  2010-07-23 11:42 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 12:33   ` Eric W. Biederman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-07-23 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	David Hill, H. Peter Anvin

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).

This one is a mystery.  I have tried and failed to reproduce this on a similar
hardware configuration so I am at a loss as to where to look next to understand
this bug.

Eric



> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> Subject		: After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-09 23:25 (45 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:42 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (33 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas,
	Brian Bloniarz, Yinghai Lu

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject		: BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter	: Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com>
Date		: 2010-06-16 17:57 (38 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:42 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (32 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric W. Biederman,
	Johannes Berg, Kay Sievers

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257
Subject		: sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2010-06-20 11:23 (34 days old)
References	: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
		  Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0'
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (31 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric W. Biederman,
	Janusz Krzysztofik

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215
Subject		: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0'
Submitter	: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Date		: 2010-06-15 14:55 (39 days old)
Handled-By	: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (30 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon,
	Patrick McHardy

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject		: Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter	: Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca>
Date		: 2010-06-12 04:17 (42 days old)
Handled-By	: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 14:38   ` John W. Linville
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (29 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, nuh

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201
Subject		: SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
Submitter	: nuh <nuh-hRtevi7K+EWJQ7yn63+t2w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-14 10:45 (40 days old)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 14:38   ` John W. Linville
  2010-07-23 20:00     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2010-07-23 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	nuh

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201
> Subject		: SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
> Submitter	: nuh <nuh-hRtevi7K+EWJQ7yn63+t2w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-14 10:45 (40 days old)

No response for the submitter, no reproducer -- I think it should be closed.

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org			might be all we have.  Be ready.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
  2010-07-23 14:38   ` John W. Linville
@ 2010-07-23 20:00     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John W. Linville
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	nuh

On Friday, July 23, 2010, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201
> > Subject		: SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
> > Submitter	: nuh <nuh@mailinator.net>
> > Date		: 2010-06-14 10:45 (40 days old)
> 
> No response for the submitter, no reproducer -- I think it should be closed.

OK

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (28 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, Helmut Schaa,
	James Morris, Rajiv Andrade

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256
Subject		: tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34
Submitter	: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2010-06-20 11:15 (34 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa
Handled-By	: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (27 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-06-11 20:31 (43 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (26 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric Sandeen, Phillip Susi

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278
Subject		: lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35
Submitter	: Phillip Susi <psusi-3tLf1voIkJTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-23 16:55 (31 days old)
Handled-By	: Eric Sandeen <sandeen-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 13:11   ` Tim Gardner
  2010-07-23 13:18   ` Kees Cook
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (25 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 2 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Chris Wilson, Eric Anholt,
	Kees Cook, Tim Gardner

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294
Subject		: [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
Submitter	: Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-25 18:20 (29 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad
Handled-By	: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/111130/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 13:11   ` Tim Gardner
       [not found]     ` <4C4994FB.9090205-FkRxxPpxr6pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
  2010-07-23 13:18   ` Kees Cook
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-07-23 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Chris Wilson, Kees Cook

On 07/23/2010 01:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294
> Subject		: [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
> Submitter	: Kees Cook<kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-25 18:20 (29 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad
> Handled-By	: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/111130/
>
>

There is a patch attached to the BZ report that has been ack'd by a 
couple of testers as well as by the original committer. I've been told 
that it should go through Eric Anholt instead of Dave Arlie, but Eric 
has yet to respond.

Acked-by and Tested-by included in this thread: 
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/21/278

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <4C4994FB.9090205-FkRxxPpxr6pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
       [not found]     ` <4C4994FB.9090205-FkRxxPpxr6pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-23 20:04       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw, Eric Anholt, Kees Cook
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Friday, July 23, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 01:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294
> > Subject		: [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
> > Submitter	: Kees Cook<kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-06-25 18:20 (29 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad
> > Handled-By	: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/111130/
> >
> >
> 
> There is a patch attached to the BZ report that has been ack'd by a 
> couple of testers as well as by the original committer. I've been told 
> that it should go through Eric Anholt instead of Dave Arlie, but Eric 
> has yet to respond.

Eric?

> Acked-by and Tested-by included in this thread: 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/21/278

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 13:11   ` Tim Gardner
@ 2010-07-23 13:18   ` Kees Cook
  2010-07-23 20:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2010-07-23 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Chris Wilson, Tim Gardner

Hi Rafael,

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).

The regression still exists[1] in the mainline kernel -- the confirmed fix
mentioned below has not been committed.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294
> Subject		: [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
> Submitter	: Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-25 18:20 (29 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad
> Handled-By	: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/111130/

Thanks,

-Kees

[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=history;f=drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c;h=HEAD

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
  2010-07-23 13:18   ` Kees Cook
@ 2010-07-23 20:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
       [not found]       ` <201007232205.14936.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook, Kernel Testers List, Tim Gardner
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki

On Friday, July 23, 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> 
> The regression still exists[1] in the mainline kernel -- the confirmed fix
> mentioned below has not been committed.

That's why the bug entry hasn't been closed yet. :-)

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <201007232205.14936.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver
       [not found]       ` <201007232205.14936.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-29 20:31         ` Jiri Slaby
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2010-07-29 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Kees Cook, Kernel Testers List, Tim Gardner,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki

On 07/23/2010 10:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, July 23, 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>>> know (either way).
>>
>> The regression still exists[1] in the mainline kernel -- the confirmed fix
>> mentioned below has not been committed.
> 
> That's why the bug entry hasn't been closed yet. :-)

Finally, it's merged as e7b96f28c...

regards,
-- 
js

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-27  0:00   ` James Bottomley
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (24 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, James Bottomley, Len Brown

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
Submitter	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-21 16:03 (33 days old)
Message-ID	: <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-27  0:00   ` James Bottomley
       [not found]     ` <1280188821.7125.486.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2010-07-27  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Len Brown

On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 13:47 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271
> Subject		: 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
> Submitter	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-21 16:03 (33 days old)
> Message-ID	: <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2
> Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/

Just got back to the machine in question.  It's gone in 2.6.35-rc6+ (can
we get rid of this stupid '+'?) by

commit 3d695839a135a9b3f24b0d7cfd9c4fde2eadd2c5
Author: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Mon Jun 28 20:55:01 2010 -0400

    ACPI: handle systems which asynchoronously enable ACPI mode
 
So you can close the bug entry.

Thanks,

James



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <1280188821.7125.486.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
       [not found]     ` <1280188821.7125.486.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-27 18:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-27 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Len Brown

On Tuesday, July 27, 2010, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 13:47 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271
> > Subject		: 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?]
> > Submitter	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-06-21 16:03 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2
> > Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/
> 
> Just got back to the machine in question.  It's gone in 2.6.35-rc6+ (can
> we get rid of this stupid '+'?) by
> 
> commit 3d695839a135a9b3f24b0d7cfd9c4fde2eadd2c5
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date:   Mon Jun 28 20:55:01 2010 -0400
> 
>     ACPI: handle systems which asynchoronously enable ACPI mode
>  
> So you can close the bug entry.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 14:41   ` Nick Bowler
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Airlie,
	Theodore Ts'o

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject		: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter	: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date		: 2010-06-09 18:36 (45 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID	: <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 14:41   ` Nick Bowler
       [not found]     ` <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Nick Bowler @ 2010-07-23 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Dave Airlie, Theodore Ts'o

On 13:47 Fri 23 Jul     , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
> Subject		: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
> Submitter	: Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-09 18:36 (45 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
> Message-ID	: <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb-UK71uKi2zisAobODsErMgNi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4

I actually haven't been able to reproduce with kernels since a couple
weeks ago (still reproducible if I go back to 2.6.35-rc3, though).
Seems to be fixed somehow, can anyone else confirm?

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
       [not found]     ` <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-23 18:27       ` Ted Ts'o
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2010-07-23 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:41:43AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> 
> I actually haven't been able to reproduce with kernels since a couple
> weeks ago (still reproducible if I go back to 2.6.35-rc3, though).
> Seems to be fixed somehow, can anyone else confirm?

I'll try to reproduce it over the weekend.

							- Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michal Marek, Robert Nelson

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310
Subject		: arm omap invalid module format
Submitter	: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-06-28 17:30 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c
Handled-By	: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 17:25   ` Jesse Barnes
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 17:25   ` Jesse Barnes
  2010-07-24  9:19     ` Enrico Bandiello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-23 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Enrico Bandiello

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
> Message-ID	: <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2

Just updated the bug for this one.  Enrico, you say this behavior is
recent.  Can you bisect between 2.6.34 and when the problem started?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
  2010-07-23 17:25   ` Jesse Barnes
@ 2010-07-24  9:19     ` Enrico Bandiello
       [not found]       ` <4C4AB036.3060003-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-07-24  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesse Barnes
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello

On 07/23/2010 07:25 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw@sisk.pl>  wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
>> Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
>> Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello<enban@postal.uv.es>
>> Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
>> Message-ID	:<4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es>
>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
>
> Just updated the bug for this one.  Enrico, you say this behavior is
> recent.  Can you bisect between 2.6.34 and when the problem started?
>
Hi. I just tried, but can't find anything useful until now (surely it's 
my fault: it was my first attempt at bisection). Please let me try again 
in the next days.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <4C4AB036.3060003-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
       [not found]       ` <4C4AB036.3060003-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-25  2:54         ` Kan-Ru Chen
       [not found]           ` <87sk38b7ai.fsf-ONHucydYG54+Yz5RL6G0bA@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Kan-Ru Chen @ 2010-07-25  2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Enrico Bandiello, Jesse Barnes
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello

Hi,

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:19:50 +0200, Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 07:25 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> >
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> >> of recent regressions.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> >> know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> >> Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> >> Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello<enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
> >> Message-ID	:<4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> >> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
> >
> > Just updated the bug for this one.  Enrico, you say this behavior is
> > recent.  Can you bisect between 2.6.34 and when the problem started?
> >
> Hi. I just tried, but can't find anything useful until now (surely it's 
> my fault: it was my first attempt at bisection). Please let me try again 
> in the next days.

I also noticed that interrupts keeps high in powertop. I bisected it
today:

# bad: [e44a21b7268a022c7749f521c06214145bd161e4] Linux 2.6.35-rc2
# good: [e40152ee1e1c7a63f4777791863215e3faa37a86] Linus 2.6.34
git bisect start 'v2.6.35-rc2' 'v2.6.34'
# good: [2086ca482f89950410527425913ca48d948e9622] i2c-algo-pca: Fix coding style issues
git bisect good 2086ca482f89950410527425913ca48d948e9622
# bad: [1756ac3d3c41341297ea25b818b7fce505bb2a9a] Merge branch 'virtio' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus
git bisect bad 1756ac3d3c41341297ea25b818b7fce505bb2a9a
# bad: [ec2a7587e0a91d5c1afe23a0a73edfce06c5e4e0] Merge branch 'msm-video' of git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/dwalker/linux-msm
git bisect bad ec2a7587e0a91d5c1afe23a0a73edfce06c5e4e0
# good: [e0bc5d4a54938eedcde14005210e6c08aa9727e4] Merge branch 'i2c-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging
git bisect good e0bc5d4a54938eedcde14005210e6c08aa9727e4
# good: [ac3ee84c604502240122c47b52f0542ec8774f15] Merge branch 'dbg-early-merge' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/linux-2.6-kgdb
git bisect good ac3ee84c604502240122c47b52f0542ec8774f15
# bad: [f4b7fb94c576265ceffc43031805ade32fa80c6a] drm/radeon/kms: take vram mutex pointer before derefing object.
git bisect bad f4b7fb94c576265ceffc43031805ade32fa80c6a
# bad: [0bcb1d844ac638a4c4280f697d5bfac9791e9a70] Merge branch 'drm-radeon-lockup' into drm-core-next
git bisect bad 0bcb1d844ac638a4c4280f697d5bfac9791e9a70
# bad: [77ffb5979de59efd1a6b280b10d647b09285bee0] drm/i915/pch: Use minimal number of FDI lanes (v2)
git bisect bad 77ffb5979de59efd1a6b280b10d647b09285bee0
# bad: [ab00a9ef8d4ce7de4d5b15cbf4101feeb8cf7f4d] drm/i915: Un-magic a DPCD register write
git bisect bad ab00a9ef8d4ce7de4d5b15cbf4101feeb8cf7f4d
# skip: [0f3ee801b332d6ff22285386675fe5aaedf035c3] drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+
git bisect skip 0f3ee801b332d6ff22285386675fe5aaedf035c3
# good: [5bf4c9c469ffc64b85fed1f3d2b0c8b19909ed13] drm/i915: use encoder_list for hotplug callback
git bisect good 5bf4c9c469ffc64b85fed1f3d2b0c8b19909ed13
# bad: [d275f6614e160fa71d6e2201eb34c9b41fd8473c] drm/i915: Clear the LVDS pipe B select bit when moving the LVDS to pipe A.
git bisect bad d275f6614e160fa71d6e2201eb34c9b41fd8473c
# good: [c1c43977e6fc789cbde094303fa9ace629a35aca] drm/i915: passing drm connector param for load detection
git bisect good c1c43977e6fc789cbde094303fa9ace629a35aca
# good: [6443170f6d862a1cc89e61e4bb2410b714b875f4] drm/i915: Remove dead KMS encoder save/restore code.
git bisect good 6443170f6d862a1cc89e61e4bb2410b714b875f4

The bisect stopped between d275f66 and 0f3ee80 so I reverted the
following three commits:

b3b095b drm/i915: enable LVDS on Cougarpoint
d275f66 drm/i915: Clear the LVDS pipe B select bit when moving the LVDS to pipe A.
0f3ee80 drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+

Now the powertop only shows about 0.2 interrupts per second. Hope this
information is useful.

Regards,
Kanru

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <87sk38b7ai.fsf-ONHucydYG54+Yz5RL6G0bA@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
       [not found]           ` <87sk38b7ai.fsf-ONHucydYG54+Yz5RL6G0bA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-29 18:28             ` Jesse Barnes
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-29 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kan-Ru Chen
  Cc: Enrico Bandiello, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:54:13 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen <kanru-+lMv398qL9qh6J55Ss3d3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:19:50 +0200, Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On 07/23/2010 07:25 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> > >
> > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > >> of recent regressions.
> > >>
> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > >> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > >> know (either way).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> > >> Subject		: i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> > >> Submitter	: Enrico Bandiello<enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Date		: 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
> > >> Message-ID	:<4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> > >> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
> > >
> > > Just updated the bug for this one.  Enrico, you say this behavior is
> > > recent.  Can you bisect between 2.6.34 and when the problem started?
> > >
> > Hi. I just tried, but can't find anything useful until now (surely it's 
> > my fault: it was my first attempt at bisection). Please let me try again 
> > in the next days.
> 
> I also noticed that interrupts keeps high in powertop. I bisected it
> today:
> 
> # bad: [e44a21b7268a022c7749f521c06214145bd161e4] Linux 2.6.35-rc2
> # good: [e40152ee1e1c7a63f4777791863215e3faa37a86] Linus 2.6.34
> git bisect start 'v2.6.35-rc2' 'v2.6.34'
> # good: [2086ca482f89950410527425913ca48d948e9622] i2c-algo-pca: Fix coding style issues
> git bisect good 2086ca482f89950410527425913ca48d948e9622
> # bad: [1756ac3d3c41341297ea25b818b7fce505bb2a9a] Merge branch 'virtio' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus
> git bisect bad 1756ac3d3c41341297ea25b818b7fce505bb2a9a
> # bad: [ec2a7587e0a91d5c1afe23a0a73edfce06c5e4e0] Merge branch 'msm-video' of git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/dwalker/linux-msm
> git bisect bad ec2a7587e0a91d5c1afe23a0a73edfce06c5e4e0
> # good: [e0bc5d4a54938eedcde14005210e6c08aa9727e4] Merge branch 'i2c-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging
> git bisect good e0bc5d4a54938eedcde14005210e6c08aa9727e4
> # good: [ac3ee84c604502240122c47b52f0542ec8774f15] Merge branch 'dbg-early-merge' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/linux-2.6-kgdb
> git bisect good ac3ee84c604502240122c47b52f0542ec8774f15
> # bad: [f4b7fb94c576265ceffc43031805ade32fa80c6a] drm/radeon/kms: take vram mutex pointer before derefing object.
> git bisect bad f4b7fb94c576265ceffc43031805ade32fa80c6a
> # bad: [0bcb1d844ac638a4c4280f697d5bfac9791e9a70] Merge branch 'drm-radeon-lockup' into drm-core-next
> git bisect bad 0bcb1d844ac638a4c4280f697d5bfac9791e9a70
> # bad: [77ffb5979de59efd1a6b280b10d647b09285bee0] drm/i915/pch: Use minimal number of FDI lanes (v2)
> git bisect bad 77ffb5979de59efd1a6b280b10d647b09285bee0
> # bad: [ab00a9ef8d4ce7de4d5b15cbf4101feeb8cf7f4d] drm/i915: Un-magic a DPCD register write
> git bisect bad ab00a9ef8d4ce7de4d5b15cbf4101feeb8cf7f4d
> # skip: [0f3ee801b332d6ff22285386675fe5aaedf035c3] drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+
> git bisect skip 0f3ee801b332d6ff22285386675fe5aaedf035c3
> # good: [5bf4c9c469ffc64b85fed1f3d2b0c8b19909ed13] drm/i915: use encoder_list for hotplug callback
> git bisect good 5bf4c9c469ffc64b85fed1f3d2b0c8b19909ed13
> # bad: [d275f6614e160fa71d6e2201eb34c9b41fd8473c] drm/i915: Clear the LVDS pipe B select bit when moving the LVDS to pipe A.
> git bisect bad d275f6614e160fa71d6e2201eb34c9b41fd8473c
> # good: [c1c43977e6fc789cbde094303fa9ace629a35aca] drm/i915: passing drm connector param for load detection
> git bisect good c1c43977e6fc789cbde094303fa9ace629a35aca
> # good: [6443170f6d862a1cc89e61e4bb2410b714b875f4] drm/i915: Remove dead KMS encoder save/restore code.
> git bisect good 6443170f6d862a1cc89e61e4bb2410b714b875f4
> 
> The bisect stopped between d275f66 and 0f3ee80 so I reverted the
> following three commits:
> 
> b3b095b drm/i915: enable LVDS on Cougarpoint
> d275f66 drm/i915: Clear the LVDS pipe B select bit when moving the LVDS to pipe A.
> 0f3ee80 drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+
> 
> Now the powertop only shows about 0.2 interrupts per second. Hope this
> information is useful.

Hm that doesn't make much sense.  Can you collect register dumps using
intel_reg_dumper between the two cases?  I'd expect the LVDS to be on
pipe b after the revert, but maybe before the revert we're leaving pipe
b enabled and getting spurious interrupts?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject		: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-06-28 9:40 (26 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 14:11   ` Shawn Starr
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Shawn Starr

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
Subject		: [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-06-28 0:45 (26 days old)
Message-ID	: <<201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 14:11   ` Shawn Starr
       [not found]     ` <123290.24094.qm-aqYcPWQm5sWB9c0Qi4KiSl5cfvJIxWXgQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-23 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki



Still continues. I can however hibernate and resume from hibernation ok.


>----- Original Message ----
>From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
>To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
>Cc: Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...>; Maciej Rutecki 
><maciej.rutecki@...; Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@...
>Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 7:47:31 AM
>Subject: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 
>laptop
>
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking 
>team
>know (either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry    : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311
>Subject        : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 
>laptop
>Submitter    : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@...>
>Date        : 2010-06-28 0:45 (26 days old)
>Message-ID    : <<201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@...>>
>References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <123290.24094.qm-aqYcPWQm5sWB9c0Qi4KiSl5cfvJIxWXgQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop
       [not found]     ` <123290.24094.qm-aqYcPWQm5sWB9c0Qi4KiSl5cfvJIxWXgQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-23 17:28       ` Jesse Barnes
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-23 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Starr
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> Still continues. I can however hibernate and resume from hibernation ok.
> 

If it works on Fedora, maybe you could get it working with a similar
upstream kernel (same version, same config) and then bisect?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open)
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, "werner

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332
Subject		: Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open)
Submitter	: werner@guyane.yi.org
Date		: 2010-07-02 3:34 (22 days old)
Message-ID	: <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-24  5:17   ` Zeev Tarantov
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Steven Rostedt,
	Zeev Tarantov

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
Subject		: 2.6.35 regression
Submitter	: Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-05 13:04 (19 days old)
Message-ID	: <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2
Handled-By	: Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-24  5:17   ` Zeev Tarantov
       [not found]     ` <AANLkTinRWnb5wR5SQmf0DMTbAMTy=5X2LM3k3qPFJbPu-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Zeev Tarantov @ 2010-07-24  5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Steven Rostedt

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 14:47, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
> Subject         : 2.6.35 regression
> Submitter       : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2010-07-05 13:04 (19 days old)
> Message-ID      : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2
> Handled-By      : Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch           : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/
>

Fixed in rc6.

-Zeev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <AANLkTinRWnb5wR5SQmf0DMTbAMTy=5X2LM3k3qPFJbPu-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression
       [not found]     ` <AANLkTinRWnb5wR5SQmf0DMTbAMTy=5X2LM3k3qPFJbPu-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-24 22:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-24 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zeev Tarantov
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Steven Rostedt

On Saturday, July 24, 2010, Zeev Tarantov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 14:47, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
> > Subject         : 2.6.35 regression
> > Submitter       : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2010-07-05 13:04 (19 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2
> > Handled-By      : Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch           : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/
> >
> 
> Fixed in rc6.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, boris64, H. Peter Anvin

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject		: WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter	: boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date		: 2010-07-01 13:54 (23 days old)
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16365] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock,
	Pauli Nieminen

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16365] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16372] Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Johannes Hirte

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16365
Subject		: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353
Submitter	: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Date		: 2010-07-08 14:27 (16 days old)
Message-ID	: <201007081627.24654.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127859960725931&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16372] Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16365] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Torsten Kaiser

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16372
Subject		: Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken
Submitter	: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-11 19:56 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTimkNg81yzxSHTcAa1QlTE9SYmvzL4eOTVHApWq3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127887822407672&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16372] Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16369] Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)? Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Artem S. Tashkinov

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject		: Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter	: Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem-VInPYn6yXxRWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-13 23:21 (11 days old)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16369] Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)?
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16383] Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Woody Suwalski

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16369
Subject		: Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)?
Submitter	: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-09 14:21 (15 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C373084.8000503@gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127868797119254&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16383] Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16369] Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)? Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765! Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Stefan Behte

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16383
Subject		: Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5
Submitter	: Stefan Behte <craig@haquarter.de>
Date		: 2010-07-14 00:44 (10 days old)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (24 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16383] Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 13:33   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16392] BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Markus Trippelsdorf

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject		: kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter	: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Date		: 2010-07-14 13:52 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100714135217.GA1797@arch.tripp.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765! Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 13:33   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
       [not found]     ` <20100723133355.GA1806-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Markus Trippelsdorf @ 2010-07-23 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	npiggin

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).

It happend again today:

...
Jul 23 09:22:00 arch kernel: r8169 0000:02:05.0: eth0: link up
Jul 23 09:22:00 arch kernel: r8169: WARNING! Changing of MTU on this NIC may lead to frame reception errors!
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CPU 1
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Pid: 2616, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.35-rc6-00012-g7e5a57e #32 M4A78T-E/System Product Name
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810f66c7>]  [<ffffffff810f66c7>] __bd_abort_claiming+0x17/0x40
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880035d07d18  EFLAGS: 00010207
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RAX: 0000000000009292 RBX: ffff88011f8249c0 RCX: 0000000000000002
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8182f0a0 RDI: ffff88011f8249c0
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RBP: ffff880035d07d28 R08: ffff880035d07b68 R09: ffffffff81877ea8
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: R10: ffff880035d07cb8 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff88011f8249c0
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffff8182f0a0 R15: 00000000ffffff85
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: FS:  00007f727e6a8740(0000) GS:ffff880001a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CR2: 00007f99480f2000 CR3: 000000003c34d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Process mount (pid: 2616, threadinfo ffff880035d06000, task ffff88011afe0000)
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Stack:
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: ffff880035d07d28 ffffffffffffff85 ffff880035d07d68 ffffffff810f7b6c
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: <0> ffff880035d07d98 0000000000000001 ffffffff8182f0a0 0000000000000001
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: <0> ffff88003c3c5000 ffffffff8182f0a0 ffff880035d07de8 ffffffff810d3daa
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Call Trace:
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810f7b6c>] open_bdev_exclusive+0xb3/0xc3
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d3daa>] get_sb_bdev+0x47/0x178
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8113121c>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x208d
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8112e6ba>] ext4_get_sb+0x18/0x1a
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d40af>] vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0xff
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d431b>] do_kern_mount+0x4d/0xef
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810e86ad>] do_mount+0x6cb/0x744
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810e87fb>] sys_mount+0x8c/0xcd
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8102b93b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Code: c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff 5Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: Linux version 2.6.35-rc6-00012-g7e5a57e (markus@arch.tripp.de) (gcc version 4.5.0 20100610 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #32 SMP Fri Jul 23 09:21:31 CEST 2010
Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/usr/src/linux/arch/x86/boot/bzImage root=/dev/sdb2 fbcon=rotate:3 drm.edid_force_checksum=1 quiet
Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
-- 
Markus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <20100723133355.GA1806-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
       [not found]     ` <20100723133355.GA1806-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-23 13:45       ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-07-23 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Markus Trippelsdorf
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM

On 07/23/2010 06:33 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>
> It happend again today:
>
> ...
> Jul 23 09:22:00 arch kernel: r8169 0000:02:05.0: eth0: link up
> Jul 23 09:22:00 arch kernel: r8169: WARNING! Changing of MTU on this NIC may lead to frame reception errors!
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CPU 1
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Pid: 2616, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.35-rc6-00012-g7e5a57e #32 M4A78T-E/System Product Name
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810f66c7>]  [<ffffffff810f66c7>] __bd_abort_claiming+0x17/0x40
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880035d07d18  EFLAGS: 00010207
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RAX: 0000000000009292 RBX: ffff88011f8249c0 RCX: 0000000000000002
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8182f0a0 RDI: ffff88011f8249c0
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: RBP: ffff880035d07d28 R08: ffff880035d07b68 R09: ffffffff81877ea8
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: R10: ffff880035d07cb8 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff88011f8249c0
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffff8182f0a0 R15: 00000000ffffff85
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: FS:  00007f727e6a8740(0000) GS:ffff880001a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: CR2: 00007f99480f2000 CR3: 000000003c34d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Process mount (pid: 2616, threadinfo ffff880035d06000, task ffff88011afe0000)
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Stack:
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: ffff880035d07d28 ffffffffffffff85 ffff880035d07d68 ffffffff810f7b6c
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel:<0>  ffff880035d07d98 0000000000000001 ffffffff8182f0a0 0000000000000001
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel:<0>  ffff88003c3c5000 ffffffff8182f0a0 ffff880035d07de8 ffffffff810d3daa
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Call Trace:
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810f7b6c>] open_bdev_exclusive+0xb3/0xc3
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d3daa>] get_sb_bdev+0x47/0x178
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8113121c>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x208d
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8112e6ba>] ext4_get_sb+0x18/0x1a
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d40af>] vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0xff
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810d431b>] do_kern_mount+0x4d/0xef
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810e86ad>] do_mount+0x6cb/0x744
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff810e87fb>] sys_mount+0x8c/0xcd
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: [<ffffffff8102b93b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Jul 23 13:41:43 arch kernel: Code: c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff 5Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: Linux version 2.6.35-rc6-00012-g7e5a57e (markus-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org) (gcc version 4.5.0 20100610 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #32 SMP Fri Jul 23 09:21:31 CEST 2010
> Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/usr/src/linux/arch/x86/boot/bzImage root=/dev/sdb2 fbcon=rotate:3 drm.edid_force_checksum=1 quiet
> Jul 23 13:42:38 arch kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:



o.k. so im not going insane then... problem over here is the machine is 
responding as if nothing like that occurs. atheros has one of these as 
well(like I posted)

how to reproduce such a beast of a bug...

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16392] BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (25 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765! Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ortwin Glück

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16392
Subject		: BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5
Submitter	: Ortwin Gl√ºck <odi-L693kI9kcNY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-14 6:54 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C3D5F3F.7070901-L693kI9kcNY@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127909052705341&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (26 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16392] BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rafael J. Wysocki, tomas m

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject		: [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter	: tomas m <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-15 02:32 (9 days old)
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch		: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/113108/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (27 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16405] Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, divya

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject		: Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter	: divya <dipraksh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-16 8:50 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C401D56.3070108-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16405] Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (28 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, John Mesmon, Matthew Garrett

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject		: Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter	: John Mesmon <jmesmon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-15 23:40 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By	: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-kernel-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (29 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16405] Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16400] 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Peter Zijlstra,
	Zhang, Yanmin

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject		: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-13 8:14 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID	: <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16400] 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (30 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16423] netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Martin Pirker

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject		: 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter	: Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-14 20:33 (10 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTikDF0TL6OyPVCzPlUTwxFehcrETn3ysgSSeTq92@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16423] netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (31 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16400] 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 12:28 ` 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Ben Hutchings
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	"auto401300-revL73yDgGBWk0Htik3J/w

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject		: netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter	: auto401300-revL73yDgGBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Date		: 2010-07-17 10:20 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100717072036.1BBE52804B-hP6SDYDcl0Dn1WiER8SD9wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (32 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16423] netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 12:28 ` Ben Hutchings
       [not found]   ` <1279888113.2089.2.camel-xQnnTUlwzDrdvaEqJLTMTA9jg9n5Vt1AMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
  2010-07-23 14:21 ` Larry Finger
  2010-07-23 20:36 ` Torsten Kaiser
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2010-07-23 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Kernel Testers List

Another one for you:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/30834

This has no Bugzilla entry; should I submit one?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <1279888113.2089.2.camel-xQnnTUlwzDrdvaEqJLTMTA9jg9n5Vt1AMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
       [not found]   ` <1279888113.2089.2.camel-xQnnTUlwzDrdvaEqJLTMTA9jg9n5Vt1AMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-07-23 20:08     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: Kernel Testers List

On Friday, July 23, 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Another one for you:
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/30834
> 
> This has no Bugzilla entry; should I submit one?

Yes, please.  And please make it block bug #16055.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (33 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 12:28 ` 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Ben Hutchings
@ 2010-07-23 14:21 ` Larry Finger
  2010-07-23 20:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-07-23 20:36 ` Torsten Kaiser
  35 siblings, 1 reply; 61+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2010-07-23 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
	Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On 07/23/2010 06:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> Subject		: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac<zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2010-06-28 9:40 (26 days old)
> Message-ID	:<AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2

I still have this in 2.6.35-rc5.

Larry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
  2010-07-23 14:21 ` Larry Finger
@ 2010-07-23 20:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
	Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
	Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
	DRI

On Friday, July 23, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 06:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
> > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> > Subject		: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> > Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac<zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
> > Date		: 2010-06-28 9:40 (26 days old)
> > Message-ID	:<AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
> 
> I still have this in 2.6.35-rc5.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (34 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 14:21 ` Larry Finger
@ 2010-07-23 20:36 ` Torsten Kaiser
  35 siblings, 0 replies; 61+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Kaiser @ 2010-07-23 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, DRI

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16372
> Subject         : Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken
> Submitter       : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2010-07-11 19:56 (13 days old)
> Message-ID      : <AANLkTimkNg81yzxSHTcAa1QlTE9SYmvzL4eOTVHApWq3@mail.gmail.com>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127887822407672&w=2

I just installed 2.6.35-rc6 and can confirm, that this bug is fixed.

Thanks!

Torsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 61+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-29 20:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:42 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 12:33   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:38   ` John W. Linville
2010-07-23 20:00     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 13:11   ` Tim Gardner
     [not found]     ` <4C4994FB.9090205-FkRxxPpxr6pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 20:04       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 13:18   ` Kees Cook
2010-07-23 20:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]       ` <201007232205.14936.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 20:31         ` Jiri Slaby
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-27  0:00   ` James Bottomley
     [not found]     ` <1280188821.7125.486.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-27 18:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:41   ` Nick Bowler
     [not found]     ` <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 18:27       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 17:25   ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-24  9:19     ` Enrico Bandiello
     [not found]       ` <4C4AB036.3060003-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-25  2:54         ` Kan-Ru Chen
     [not found]           ` <87sk38b7ai.fsf-ONHucydYG54+Yz5RL6G0bA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 18:28             ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:11   ` Shawn Starr
     [not found]     ` <123290.24094.qm-aqYcPWQm5sWB9c0Qi4KiSl5cfvJIxWXgQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 17:28       ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-24  5:17   ` Zeev Tarantov
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTinRWnb5wR5SQmf0DMTbAMTy=5X2LM3k3qPFJbPu-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-24 22:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16365] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16372] Regression 2.6.34->2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16369] Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16383] Regression with e1000e from 2.6.34.1 to 2.6.35-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765! Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 13:33   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
     [not found]     ` <20100723133355.GA1806-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 13:45       ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16392] BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16405] Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16400] 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16423] netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 12:28 ` 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Ben Hutchings
     [not found]   ` <1279888113.2089.2.camel-xQnnTUlwzDrdvaEqJLTMTA9jg9n5Vt1AMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 20:08     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:21 ` Larry Finger
2010-07-23 20:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 20:36 ` Torsten Kaiser

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox