From: steven chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stefanb@linux.ibm.com,
roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
eric.snowberg@oracle.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, code@tyhicks.com, bauermann@kolabnow.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 9/9] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 06:10:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <193deea5-c1b4-4189-a5a0-a3e29841225a@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAIWcwzuht+GCn29@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 4/18/2025 2:08 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 04/15/25 at 07:10pm, steven chen wrote:
>> From: Steven Chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> The amount of memory allocated at kexec load, even with the extra memory
>> allocated, might not be large enough for the entire measurement list. The
>> indeterminate interval between kexec 'load' and 'execute' could exacerbate
>> this problem.
>>
>> Define two new IMA events, 'kexec_load' and 'kexec_execute', to be
>> measured as critical data at kexec 'load' and 'execute' respectively.
>> Report the allocated kexec segment size, IMA binary log size and the
>> runtime measurements count as part of those events.
>>
>> These events, and the values reported through them, serve as markers in
>> the IMA log to verify the IMA events are captured during kexec soft
>> reboot. The presence of a 'kexec_load' event in between the last two
>> 'boot_aggregate' events in the IMA log implies this is a kexec soft
>> reboot, and not a cold-boot. And the absence of 'kexec_execute' event
>> after kexec soft reboot implies missing events in that window which
>> results in inconsistency with TPM PCR quotes, necessitating a cold boot
>> for a successful remote attestation.
>>
>> These critical data events are displayed as hex encoded ascii in the
>> ascii_runtime_measurement_list. Verifying the critical data hash requires
>> calculating the hash of the decoded ascii string.
>>
>> For example, to verify the 'kexec_load' data hash:
>>
>> sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
>> | grep kexec_load | cut -d' ' -f 6 | xxd -r -p | sha256sum
>>
>>
>> To verify the 'kexec_execute' data hash:
>>
>> sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
>> | grep kexec_execute | cut -d' ' -f 6 | xxd -r -p | sha256sum
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
> ^^^^^
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
> ^^^^^
Hi Baoquan,
I will add Co-developed-by tag in next version.
Thanks,
Steven
>> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 ++++++
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> index 24d09ea91b87..34815baf5e21 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> @@ -240,6 +240,12 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
>> unsigned long flags, bool create);
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> +void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name) {}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * The default binary_runtime_measurements list format is defined as the
>> * platform native format. The canonical format is defined as little-endian.
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> index d1c9d369ba08..38cb2500f4c3 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>> #include "ima.h"
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> +#define IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN 256
>> +
>> static bool ima_kexec_update_registered;
>> static struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
>> static size_t kexec_segment_size;
>> @@ -31,6 +33,24 @@ static void ima_free_kexec_file_buf(struct seq_file *sf)
>> sf->count = 0;
>> }
>>
>> +void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name)
>> +{
>> + char ima_kexec_event[IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN];
>> + size_t buf_size = 0;
>> + long len;
>> + int n;
>> +
>> + buf_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
>> + len = atomic_long_read(&ima_htable.len);
>> +
>> + n = scnprintf(ima_kexec_event, IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN,
>> + "kexec_segment_size=%lu;ima_binary_runtime_size=%lu;"
>> + "ima_runtime_measurements_count=%ld;",
>> + kexec_segment_size, buf_size, len);
>> +
>> + ima_measure_critical_data("ima_kexec", event_name, ima_kexec_event, n, false, NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(size_t segment_size)
>> {
>> /*
>> @@ -53,6 +73,7 @@ static int ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(size_t segment_size)
>> out:
>> ima_kexec_file.read_pos = 0;
>> ima_kexec_file.count = sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr); /* reserved space */
>> + ima_measure_kexec_event("kexec_load");
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> index 83d53824aa98..590637e81ad1 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> @@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ static int ima_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned long action,
>> void *data)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> + if (action == SYS_RESTART && data && !strcmp(data, "kexec reboot"))
>> + ima_measure_kexec_event("kexec_execute");
>> +#endif
>> +
>> ima_measurements_suspend();
>>
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-20 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 2:10 [PATCH v12 0/9] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 1/9] ima: rename variable the seq_file "file" to "ima_kexec_file" steven chen
2025-04-18 3:30 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 2/9] ima: define and call ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf() steven chen
2025-04-18 4:33 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 12:22 ` steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 3/9] kexec: define functions to map and unmap segments steven chen
2025-04-18 4:36 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 12:30 ` steven chen
2025-04-21 2:09 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-21 13:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-04-21 14:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-04-21 20:40 ` steven chen
2025-04-21 21:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-04-21 21:44 ` steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 4/9] ima: kexec: skip IMA segment validation after kexec soft reboot steven chen
2025-04-18 7:37 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 12:32 ` steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 5/9] ima: kexec: define functions to copy IMA log at soft boot steven chen
2025-04-18 7:40 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 12:33 ` steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 6/9] ima: kexec: move IMA log copy from kexec load to execute steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 7/9] ima: verify if the segment size has changed steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 8/9] ima: make the kexec extra memory configurable steven chen
2025-04-18 8:14 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 13:03 ` steven chen
2025-04-16 2:10 ` [PATCH v12 9/9] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data steven chen
2025-04-18 9:08 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-20 13:10 ` steven chen [this message]
2025-04-17 1:09 ` [PATCH v12 0/9] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute Stefan Berger
2025-04-20 12:21 ` steven chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=193deea5-c1b4-4189-a5a0-a3e29841225a@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=chenste@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox